Monday, August 3, 2015

Is the job of physics to make quantum functions speculation machines of our data?


Caption: the universe starts anew, but it seems to start more restrained than watching it grow through several beginnings over the colder Wisconsin winter (the ferns with their wide and diverse coal bearing DNA seem much more hardy) is the soil depleted or only something, a spark left from its heart that began at least three incarnations from its center?  The price perhaps of specialization and less diversity somewhere up on something like the idea of an inflation ladder from some beginning.

Let us imagine this as a model of the electromagnetic potentials of a human nerve.  From the anthropocentric  view we can project on the universe the idea that it could ultimately be a great brain.  If we say in our model building (trying to make sense of things by thinking) it does take some energy, say spots that are either cold or hot or neutral. It is not just the neurologists who do not keep strict steps of reasoning. here is a remarkable paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.08660v1.pdf  that suggests to me any idea of dark matter as one of the stances on a theory of everything should be eliminate from the discussion as physics in controlled steps.  So while it is clever the idea of a simple reversal of sign where such matter freezes out of inflation where the equations merely contain inverted pure numbers serves only to allow for wider speculation for model building that does not address the deeper duality in hidden nature with constrained speculation but a double explosion of only inflation centered models. It tells us how as theoreticians to create many more such theories rather than solve a particular concrete case as does this experiment. So physics becomes runaway speculation worse than our theories we say of neurologists are too vague to compare to the sensible idea of physics as the more accurate and superior science.  But this will leave such theoreticians cold or out in the cold.  Worse as this experiment shows in its simplicity of useful dialectical elements it shows us something deeper of the actual function and structure of a nerve itself so in that sense neurology can be seen as the superior science.  Sabine has an interesting comment on her blogspot from a neurologist. on this very issue.  Charlie Currie says "we cannot go chasing everything that is shiny" which is the higher debate of what in such science speculations as this may not be the case.    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153562097301934&set=a.471672546933.289713.571861933&type=1  thanks to post through Natalie Chan.

L. Edgar Otto Charlie Currie I put it right up there with gravity. You can't go chasing every shiny object of effect. There is a single impetus.
L. Edgar Otto Tell me more about such a single impetus.

Iota (point-ray) Iodine: Iota dynamics


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-meta-law-to-rule-them-all-physicists-devise-a-theory-of-everything/

L. Edgar Otto Still, it seems too much a coincidence that from the beginning to the end of my long intellectual life where most everyone comes closer to my QUASIC theory in concrete and trivial detail that this can be the truth.

 The idea of an absolute nothingness, a zero point can cover a lot of space, globally. But if the Null is a part of every set then is Null a subset of itself? Must there be a compromise as an averaging along the lines of Dirac's nilpotent algebra? Sure, the matter exceeds antimatter on the average where it comes into and out of virtual existence, quantum-like and over directions of time. But what is to say it does not work both ways. The Platonic idea seems the mainstream physics of our time but does that mean it cannot find unity on any scale with Aristotle's concepts? A is A or A is not A in science and sanity? But I agree that in a more unified sense we can find a universal reference frame for the polyhedral density (n things take r at a time) is a pretty good description of what we mean by matter density. This can be mirrored much more deeply and in a sense intimate with concrete or implied ideas of implication as if superimposition or that as disjoint. You have an interesting stance in your variety of skepticism. Our bilateral symmetry is already such a reference frame. I saw on the bus this morning 20 kids self drawings of which about 2/3 rds of them drew the nose like a number 2, some more like a Y for crescents around both eyes and some the barest hint of a small integral s curve. Physics in the expression of parity is whatever it is... but it seems that both for the child and adult this issue is a struggle to come to a higher understanding of such fundamental things for a unity of what we are individually and socially. A and A or A and not A can be both in a sense at the same time (the excluded middle or axiom of existence can be suspect.) parameters in this deeper maturity of transcending local philosophy and culture is not the most fundamental thing to consider here.

And sometimes the technology catches up with the theory. But here is a case where in either test or theory these gurus have "detected" or discovered at some zero point the idea of a crystal QM cat whiisker detector and told us so as inventors, Charlie. They went further making the equivalent of an isolated transistor of test and ideas which not requiring time fixed nor quantized is essential to such circuits which no human would build this way but a self designing computer chip can albeit a little long winded on the almost certain way to find it by such implied scales of time reversal at the boundaries. The depth of "quasized" distance is at once zero and one, that is, on this level of abstraction a crystal ball or an hyperboloid filled with liquid or is solid glass will focus or condense parallel rays of light. But even with Lorentz xy circular invariant we cannot really do this with a cylinder in the infinite steps of spherical 3D invariant. As in the quasi neutral case of some perpetually moving quantum particles. Pentaquarks, anyone? And some trivially obvious ideas in principle do not appear to be testable in this way either.

Comment on Sabine Hossenfelder 's Backreaction blogspot:  
A most interesting and clearly written responsible reply. This bundle of neurons that as if on dimensionless scales feels strongly at some point we are not free to have many different interpretations as we access our dreams or pass them directly to the waken world. We all make up stories but they are not necessarily lies. Is there a deeper mechanism that may ground such a more complicated mental landscape? I have a conceptual formula for it, but as highly trivial it remains symbolic. A hint there is a universal code I call iota iodine for communication or a better resolution of source and search code for this wonderful intelligible question.

Jes, I will read this when I can see it on a bigger than business sizes screen. Gauss started so much in math and.modern physics (gave Riemann some choices for his theses.) Your comment said in a few words something I was not aware I knew. "circular motion and linear motion unified this way but not enough space on the way to find it". So after all this time it is still unresolved that physics as this simple stance describing primitive motion. Beyond issues of curvature and surfaces rich developments does not seem enough. So, let us say in a surface- essentially n-dimensional it has depth and span over an open or closed surface. There is further depth as if a whole new depth and span (some iimagine as not existing, (all motiion circular said the Greeks wh rejected infinity and had no symbol for nothingness. Some use the metaphor of something there or implied as dark stuff) There is still a finite universe in the running as part of the big picture you wondered about in a comment. I have long felt but could not quite make the final leap into what Gauss may have been seeing in the higher reaches of number theory. Can twistior theory be such a mirroring. I can see why that theory appeals to you as depth along the way. We should all review what Gauss had to say. It has been awhile for me and hard as just recreation to know yet not see how all those little squares of quadratic reciprocity came together. Hope you do not mind this long comment.

As well mechanisms of dimensional emergence and reasonable containment over time of intermediate cascading matrix confluences. I find it interesting that in many ways as in N's excellent posts here that progress in the material sciences are ahead of our theories.

* * * 
Reply to Christrian Mapia  on his QuantumGravity:

Looks like a lot of work put into your QMG with the usual equations, but you do see something in the symmetry of the 4x4 matrix.  The logic of it tries to look at things from a higher view (not sure if double quantization is enough).  Christian Mapia ... given the what if cases of the axioms the overall logic is sound although some what if cases are dismissed as an overview, the issues of proofs of things -  What if the universe is assumed a combination of both big bang and ongoing creation in the same changes of passing from one probability state to another not assumed invariant or or not in the change?  So there are philosophic questions here  which adds what should seem to be a help to readers from the equations if they are familiar with them.  The universe could intrinsically have this condition where at some paradoxical ultimate zero point regardless of time and its directions more fundamental laws than quantum or relativistic concepts allow the conclusion the universe not just local or in general obviously accelerates by alternative methods to what we try to resolve as paradox between the logic as tautology vs contradiction, a step deeper than just radical probability that seems only a surface description.  So at this stage of our conversation I have to address your background assumptions as to the metaphysics, or better religion.  Christ here as the idea of logos, the word...  "The world framed by the Word of God...  faith the substance of things hoped for that what is seen was made by that which does not appear."  So as in the paradox of physics unification where Heaven, or God as the ultimate concern we have the usual idea of a materialist centered model and that of a Mysterious model, roughly the Protestant and Catholic approaches (of which Orthodoxy is a reasonable compromise where as classical logic at least all stances to the existence of God or not are tenable..)  The chief problem here is that at some ultimate Logos, the idea of Chirst as the center of the logic is an exception to which all that follows as a center in time is the one concept that like the big bang outside of physical-material logic remains and not labored upon beyond faith a mysterious proposition.  What then of Trinity (not mentioned in the scriptures)? of its possible correspondence to three space, or say quarks as triplicate?  A logical compromise still in search of an ultimate unity? One or many gods or worlds? I do not see a calculation that shows your 33%.  I would intuitively say more likely 38% and then only to the second "quantiized level".  As for the website that allows sending of large files there are some warnings is it not safe to access - but then is anything in our present state of the internet?  All this could be sent in a very small file anyway of a better idea of the unity of physics is closer to the ultimate case.  I hope this helps you some for it will be interesting to see what you explore next.

Thursday, July 30, 2015

On the Transactional DreamSpace Universe (XdsU)






On the Transactional DreamSpace Universe  (XdsU)    L. Edgar Otto

The use of a plus sign with a circle around it as a form of positive addition that leads to cascades of weights by matrices of in graph theory while a consistent method that presents proofs should consider dark mirrors implied or in actuality as if for particle physics and the simplest laws of motion, quasic praeternatural motion, leads to a wider conception of what are the laws of physics.  It is a question of what is the container as well as what is that contained in relation to directions a the question of the initial designation as if something comes into existence or vanishes as being more than the permutations over generations quasifinite and tachyonic like in expression of those laws that seem both acceleration and probabilistic degrees of arrow of time biases.

Interesting things can be concluded as to the accumulation of wisdom both in an individual and for society.  Some things in this doubly synthetic theory as thought can remain unresolved that for civilization and of the role of science and scientists with a better explanation, the Big Science model of which we seem to have survived without consensus on such alternative possibilities.  From this view there are no guarantees that individual thinkers, those who take a modest synthetic step hailed as Nobel Prize worthy, it truly original as if a theory of everything.  Application of ideas of chain reaction is engineering for the environs of its day.  Where there is anomalies that seem to violate existing laws at all is merely the artifact of our use of limited notation.  Even if the effect is small if there is any at all it eventually leads toward exponential inflation, such as cosmic inflation ideas. Of which small changes can make great social ones that justifies expense for the industrial complex with a projects of its won as Big Science or rather rumors of it, Big Science Fiction to build on the directions at hand or in some sense to defeat them.

The transactional idea is the application of lesser initiator and terminator places in a coherent matrix of matrices that that of simple being. It can be considered supernatural as well or interpreted as people do not have any necessary reality of human rights save by power and the fortunes of war. But what I address here is not the confusions of ideology and politics nor the questions of what is the culture or ethics of the day.  The essential question I will answer from this alternative view is “Of What does the Fetus Dream” when it spends so much time in REM sleep?  Consider this an introduction to further thoughts and simulations when I have sufficient access to the virtual world and its logic as well as the question of what it means to access our dreams and there nature as if we each have so much endowment to reach our individual understanding of space as dreams itself that we can find more than these facts of space and time as one initial being of motion, one living in the the state of the moment, or one cascade of a razors edge or fraying tightrope are methods of analysis and forewarning for those awakened in the world that may prove to the wise ones among us we are just meaningless symbols in limited arrays.

Nevertheless, this alternative conception as disturbing as it may be to long standing issues of our era, what is toxic of race and culture as recurrent themes or simply where does the universe of indifference stand on what is good or evil, what of lives matter or beyond present conditions can be planned such that no life on earth is in the way of pointless awakened arbitrary progress.  Dreams as such have their place but the duality seems elusive and full of self deception in our isolation or protections that we may commit and function to some style of living.  I can write in the purity of dreams but not even a photo to record them directly as things stand as if only what is the even and not focused landscape is accessible.  Yet, from the intuitive inspiration of such imagination I clearly present this a little more experienced than from the imagined purity of some degree of our childlike natures that this leap of synthesis and analysis is in fact presented to you from a being that on awakening presents it as awake.

  * * *



Monday, July 27, 2015

Romancing the Quasic Theory (some comments on social media)




fb comment activity for g+ blog posts?

JK Society if it is to transcend to the next level of our interconnectivity, the virtual internet if not the electric grid itself survives its vulnerability, now depends on how well we can navigate abstractly between what we can see or interpret what we cannot of our partial simulations.
Interesting links, Joseph. Treat the little arrows as binary coordinates of either the particles or the field box that contains them. These make a 2D quasic dimensional box that can be read in a specific order or sequence. The 0's and 1's can be interchanged the 'shadow ' as if in 3D natural dimensions. Four such (logically tetra boxes) can form a linear or the same sequence in 4D as a 2D lattice of boxes in boxes. 16 0D boxes. 64 cells 8x8. 2^q so 5D = 16 x 8 and 6D = 256 and so on... This the basis of my logical and playable 4D chessgame of 1963. Much has happened since then, much has not, and much seems to be finally happening now from these vague early independent recreational math beginnings. Sometimes,in the lonely frontier of new theory someone builds on it and even surpasses it as we go beyond original concept's. In a way this helps to confirm them. Now, what about the boundaries, the dark mirror physics of the lines between the cells of the quasic grid itself?
The 2D representations are easily extended into 3D or more. But the properties that aquire names as quasifinite facts by this method are not saved in reduction nD down to 2D. But this lattice property exists even if our widest generalization is not seen in a world of only 2D where all Lie groups seem enumerated. Even the Monsters. The laws of physics conserved without appeal to say holographic principles of supersymmetry distinctions as so called information lost or that such effects in time where the simulation meets the physical reality are imagined grounded in illusion. This could be the case but not in terms of being - but as philosophy of existents at least at the level we understand physics now including how some imagine the highest meaning of QM theory.
SH All these social experiments seem to me to take too long , is too little, and too late. My modest candle company in the early 70's did all this but not based on theory nor even ideas we were organized (but informally) as a commune or cooperative - but for common sense including better creative designs and production. But on the IRC chat in the late 90's I put women in position of power (there we none even if majored in philosophy.) And they were much more mean ti each other than the guys. Something I do not understand is going on here. After all, who rembers Elizabeth the First or Catherine the Great ?

If I had a theory of everything and could see it with a single unified eye I would say she has a knack for the multiple dualities involved with my quasic physics - not QM or string theory as fundamental. This drawing is classic. (assuming the two eyes in the center of a face are not meant to be a nose) Jung noted that children have a period where they draw faces with 4eyes. I have seen kids do this myself. But speculations aside it could be something simpler, a question of identity landscape - the fact in time and bonds or separation she is a twin. "Adam, you did not have to scribble all over your picture when I asked why you drew four eyes." " No. That is just Adam all tangled up. " he said. But I would like to believe she has the theoretical potential of Penrose who realizes it takes 8 bits and not 4 for an exchange of QM and gravity information. :-)
Ron T) So you can make a candle which is its own wick? Holy 20 mule team borax! Why doesn't it accelerate the fast neutrons? Note to.Iran : Hide your nuclear wastes in pools of water. Boom! Element 5 has new interesting chemistry. (Better living through chemistry,right? ) Well, if we do not know basic things how can we build complicated things safely?
nukes oz So you can make a candle which is its own wick? Holy 20 mule team borax! Why doesn't it accelerate the fast neutrons? Note to.Iran : Hide your nuclear wastes in pools of water. Boom! Element 5 has new interesting chemistry. (Better living through chemistry,right? ) Well, if we do not know basic things how can we build complicated things safely?
SH and JScott  Neat bubble link, Jes. Once we get past the idea "mass is a knot of space." A hoot. Did they solve it? So if very rapid micro pulsars explain that analogous debate where do the missing spectra go in those fluid scales of "dark hydrogen bonding"? You must have overheard Feynman talking in his sleep :-)
I made a drawing but it lost in a power outage glitch. Basically 8 tetracibes in 32 cells then add 32 as a.mirror then isolate and interchange the 4 chiral ones. 64 - 8 = 56 = 9 x 6 plus 2 = 2 x (27 + 1) 
Now 64 - 24 = 40 and 64 - 36 = 28. 5D - 4D close sphere packing. 28 codons implied as 4D. This assumed intuitively long ago while making variations on the SOMA cube puzzle SomaMore. Note 240 is the number of 8D spheres around a center one and is the number of SOMA solutions. 25 is the number as initiator. Jes.
Jes Scott replied  I wonder if that child is still in all of us learned adults. I have some serious questions for Jr.
Ron, the Lord of the Dark Force, our skywalking father, must think we are peons instead of pions and that laser sword size matters to the landscape environment in this age where the masses are more sophisticated via science fiction. But man cannot live only to save the princess nor by Wonder Woman bread alone :-)
In a more unified physics the structure or design of the model makes sense for something, not necessarily a quantum or gravity concept can act as a binder or mediator between two such spaces real or implied as if a dark or neutral horizon of the symmetrical and at once asymmetrical as more fundamental physics. The hierarchy and parity of dimensional subcells between dimensions is obvious simple geometry of 4 'pion'-like objects where color and structure are exchanged by such probability condensed gravitational matter = condensed material gravitation. CMG can be put into strings as mediators in these quasifinitely described models as implied but not complete supersymmetry or time arrow directions. Such inevitible lesser speculations are logical and consistent , predictable. I use the term 'Quasic' as it is more fundamental than QM. But this came before quarks and quasars and string theories as TOEs. The counting in detail of low dimensions and partical generations is the key where CGM as the Higgs field is at once one object and many objects aabstractly. In three generations we assert Higgs can act as both a mediator and terminator as in the dynamic expression of DNA in all its representations over the quasic field. But this is not the last word on the Big Picture and Big Show.
The first being the last, rinse and repeat. Echo. I wonder how that looks as a mathematical model. JS said
L. Edgar Otto Why does 480 come up in the usual physics equations? After all these are integer numbers. But when I do some calculations it is in binary. Not geometric images. I think you are right, it could explain light in compressed fluids but so could tension kinks in a breaking knot. Either way it.is a 3-space problem. (If I understand you were thinking about it this way smile emoticon )
Jes Scott Mass as a knot would incorporate Penrose's twistor work very very nicely...I hope he's on the right track, I love watching his ideas evolve. And I really like that complex analysis ought to be considered as physical properties of nature. I cant imagine it any other way and still have electromagnetism work the way it does. It depends on i. How could i then be reduced to an abstract concept I don't know. I may be too naïve still. My mind is not trained to go down one path yet so everything in my head interacts with itself still, strying to solve a very very very big jigsaw puzzle. I'm very curious if my creative inclination in physics goes away with longer, harder schooling, or gets more keen and inspired... Piano helps. Tons.
Rob Gerardi Interesting discussion you two.
Jes Scott Oh that's pretty. Very pretty.... Gödel did a mathematical model for nonlinear time in which he first supposed the universe to be a rotating superfluid. From this a ring in the center should transpire in which time would exist along the path of that ring. It would be hilarious if ever we decided the universe to be a rotating soccer ball. Nah....that's just silly. Unless it was a point...too? Where's Ron Hubbard when I need him.


In theory those visible if we could see everywhere beyond the perspective from incoming data by the speed of light, these tend to be a finite number on the average as are the protons. But how many of this as a universal cosmic model could exist beyond what we really cannot see or know something there is an open question.
This explains why most people live on the surface between the dark and light of day. Somewhere in between, the dawn and twilight, thus like birds or fish that is when we sing. But the inquisitive seek more of the night for sound travels further in the deeps and the swooping owls with their expert talons to build their nests with single strands of your black hole hair are thought evil demons or highly intelligent when it may be just a matter of an anomaly of devoting so much of their brain matter to their eyes. If there are no gray groups there is not balance living on the surface of processes without mystery and passion for a stable life social yet in its own right the forces gray. Can science sustain its imagination?
Jes DM   

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Epiphany, Ecstasy, and Experts for Our Eureka Moments




Epiphany, Ecstasy, and Experts for Our Eureka Moments L. Edgar Otto 07-25-15


There is a phenomenon in our species I have seen over and over again, one of how we evaluate our own or others work, overreaching and overestimating it at times or underestimating it, established in the safety of the elite crowd by irony as in the know.

A leap of understanding deduced or stumbled upon that fills us with a vague but intense moment of ecstasy which some take as cracking a great hidden secret of the universe that stand out by the cautious science minded as a deep and preciously rare mystical experience.

This then accepted and built upon as if a logic that can be applied. One that may be a bottleneck of visions and counting as well, where such thought processes meet. But is secret again, a protection of our new state of being in privacy that the epiphany can be protected from mundane lesser profane thinkers in the world.

That or we with less self doubt with more doubt for the experts sometimes surrender to them or our leaders as if they are gods to find mental balance.

Then again, given social voice and opportunity by circumstance, like most anyone, entangled games with others have no hidden motives in our own or their exchanges in conversation. For me Conway comes to mind. We all deal with such concepts of psychology as if degrees of all of the above traits of personality.

Would you gaze through a window at the falling snow from the warm artificial sunlight of your hearth? Or go outside, brave the cold to capture a snowflake a short while to observe its pattern before it melts in in your hand?

Science and life tries to delay the decay, parameters controlled to observe the symmetry a little longer, a drive to know despite life's burdens and sacrifices.


It seems to me rather Biblical, the fact nets of 153 fish – truths of the influences of Greek philosophy and number theory where in its day at the dawn of music of the spheres, we pass on patterns and store golden ages if we can keep or recall them through generations. That passage foresaw for ideas ideas in our day, and for our own particle generation limits what like the dust we stand on is contained as a concept of asymptotic freedom.

* * * * * * 


Some Poetic comments to science articles posted on facebook:

This explains why most people live on the surface between the dark and light of day.  Somewhere in between, the dawn and twilight, thus like birds or fish that is when we sing.  But the inquisitive seek more of the night for sound travels further in the deeps and the swooping owls with their expert talons to build their nests with single strands of your black hole hair are thought evil demons or highly intelligent when it may be just a matter of an anomaly of devoting so much of their brain matter to their eyes.  If there are no gray groups there is not balance living on the surface of processes without mystery and passion for a stable life social yet in its own right the forces gray.   Can science sustain its imagination?


Will humans take on the role of corals?  Free floating larva that responds to the changes in the environment - climate, sea level and so on a barrier reef against the dark attracting and sustaining other life forms - if we find a place to be established but fixed awhile before we spend our light and leave great castles in the depths and sky?

On the illustration above there I added on the photo a caption   "Building bridges across the confluence of our dreams"  but I hope also to post one from the same perspective when and if we really build the bridge."

* * * 

Friday, July 24, 2015

Patrix - Quasifinite Color Matching of Deltahedral Symmetry



More on the long standing theme of this blog, a dark fluid concept toward matter,  wet or dry it seems a waterdrop or oil drop charge model on higher dimensional steroids.  This I call XcSn, Transitive Chromatic Space Notation.  I considered the kite arrangements too as in the background of Danilo's photo.
https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/t31.0-8/11722333_10206608472543211_3647746903598168923_o.jpg  Danilo Zammattio    I was just moving some color cubes in my minds eye. My vision must have jumped briefly into your drawing and grounded better came back again. Lately, your series feels to me still another conceptual breakthrough.

***

Monday, July 20, 2015

Lisanardo


Sometimes we find little truths on the way to more general theories, so there is wiggle room for our imaginations in the dark and this can be seen as evidence as we try to find the pattern as if something happened (like Uranus pushed out of the usual spin by some catastrophe)  At least this is seen as a mystery still in how our solars systems are formed...  So as we go beyond Neptune and contemplate wider dimensions I give you another alternate theory- Lisanardo the enigmatic smile that questions issues of gender (of numbers that is) and the question if Leonardo made a second painting or it was just a clone of his apprentice if not his Ganymede that once filled the constellation Aquarius in the sky. It was a joint enterprise of craftsmen after all back then.  Why did the Neanderthal's vanish?  Perhaps because they did not divide the labor of their genders (even if they were smarter the sexy cromags surpassed them.  There is no intrinsic man woman war nor wish to live vs death wish, necessarily.  But the problem or bottleneck here is that we can go too far in the dominance of one gender... and their codes of inheritance. For one extreme replicates the male code itself subduing the women and the other extreme is a mirror, really a sociobiology, were all is one gender save the queen and her double chromosomes and a few worthless drones for a single colony of infertile female workers.