Creative Science & Philosophy

GENERAL STEREONOMETRY

2012-02-10T15:50:00.001-06:00

GENERAL STEREONOMETRY

L. Edgar Otto 02-10-12

Considering the universe as quasi-finite, when we look at the general sky for patterns we could consider evidence for finite polytopal models that are geometrically still in the running for the idea of the finitude of a model of the universe.

This will seem trivial as a way to view things or too synthetic for it not to be mere properties of mathematics or physics principles. Such structures and relations are ways we orient ourselves in the world and Penrose suggests that twistor theory orientation is the general mechanism of gravity. Ideal objects as material objects aleign to this concept of directionality. Gravity as such reacts to the mass positionally in what seems the usual case in a general space to which we may add or modify principles toward some imagined universal center.

This center can be in time also, and there may be a center or some levels that so contain such a center. From one respect each of us has a center, as from the view of each galaxy assuming a proper time as if the absolute aether after all (Einstein we could use the old term within newer theories of spacetime and matter). Does this correspond to some higher actual center, the earth is said to be as we reason out or think we see things like an axis of the universe- or I have heard some theoreticians speculate such a center exists 65 or so million years away.

Perhaps it is not so much a mystical theory along the lines of Kepler's centering of the shells of polyhedra, but with at least 4-space considerations to get the idea this said in evolving historical terms that at the still mysterious extinctions that long ago may be connected as if major states of the universe within geological time have shifted almost abruptly including evolving atoms. I would relate this to Saturn's rings but that is falsified in that such rings lately are thought to remain stable from some origin that is not clear as to when.

Of course many interesting views of this cosmic background have been presented, some not as deep a theory in the details as say the measure of anisotropy of light or for that matter on the subatomic scale evidence in the wobble of muons for parallel universes just as some think they see rings, which of course would be evidence also including the influences from previous states that still connect to this one.

Some of these philosophic ideas and vague but useful general principles become a little clearer when we take the quasic view as principles of a third and new physics. The mystery becomes a sensing of what seems trivial (after all it is rare we are aware of the invisible air we breathe). Our thinking itself evolves to understand such changes of states to which a rigid game to its programming has yet to ultimate beat our brain and mind design finite or progressively quasi-finite.

In such a case some principles that have a certain reality and utility for explanations cannot merely be a matter of mechanism as rigid logic, nor can chaos or randomness be the accessible god behind the machines. There is more to the universe than mathematical and physical descriptions as the certainty of some characterized ground where the quasi-finite is ambiguous where such general species of reason and laws are applied to a non-necessary but paradoxical universe.

Hence we have the concept and problems with say monopoles. But what is such a pole but some intersection of greater spaces where somewhere in that space we are the center where all directions meet as if we contain such a real or virtual singularity. The ideal point at infinity in perspective needs not be the only one in a composite drawing.

So, we simply suggest that the actual universal background taken as at least spherical harmonics can be in its components of whatever nature or origin- even that of dark matter of which we say we can model from the densities of the cosmic background, or the ratio of H and He so as to determine the universe's age, say from the "Big Bang"- that we apply the simple and abstractly independent idea of group theory. That is on all the multiverse of perspectives and planes and dimensions shadowed down as what we see on the surface or on multiple three space shells of surfaces as a "general stereonometry"- we rotate it for example as the dihedral group. If we do this we may see the concept of orthogons as embedded in a quasi-finite hierarchy with the usual number of shadows in shadow dimensions for the various inter-dimensional motions, rests, and abstract centering by which it is not clear we have not imposed the pattern of geometry imagined on the universe, not the algebra of it all upon the working, not foundational laws. It is of interest, even when evaluating statistical data that we take the general quadrapole structures in account.

In three space, moreover, groups around the sphere as the usual representation when infinite as in Noether's sense of action and so on, or for the idea of holograms of infinite poles, we can in a tangible universe see or impose on such centers, and spherically so for we are outside the background as if we can assume a nucleus is in fact spherical, that what is trivial and ambiguous can ground the physical fact of structure, or for that matter the action of the vacuum and its relatively proper space structures. In this sense we do not rest on the idea that any sort of nilpotence or conservation laws need be anything but a little less rigid as quasi-symmetry and of course as all is abstract but in a sense over time becomes concrete as structure, the quasi-super symmetric. Thus that world as a tension or coincidence of things invisible as also quasi-asymmetric.

* * * * *

Oxford Avenue Lampions (Alpha)

2012-02-10T10:21:00.003-06:00

Lox (Oxford Avenue Lampions) L. Edgar Otto

February 9, 2012

Toward the possibilities of nD printing: Thought Experiment Alpha, the synthetic theory...

Observation 1 - A 3D printer can be assembled as one piece including the "holes".

Intuition 1 - A nD program will logically design the placement of such holes (tubes, or in a sense with active axioms, worm holes.)

Observation 2 - A binary number can execute a program such that its inverse (which as a physical reality is ambiguous) amounts to an assertion of relatively not ambiguous zero division.

Intuition 2 - This symmetry of ambiguity can be used to determine the knotting in a field of such worm holes.

Intuition 2b - In 4 and greater space the idea of a knot as fixed or tied variously shows that we need an ambiguous generalized definition of the knot concept itself.

Intuition 2c - In that knots are forms of loops or braids, such arrangements in the general view can function as opened or closed under the general ambiguity of a knot field and its restrictions as to the ambiguity of physical solutions.

Observation 3 - In quasic knot space the application of octonions and beyond can find symmetric solutions for field theory which are not there for non-ambiguous field theory.

Intuition 3 - Thus, with the quasic ambiguity (beyond the idea of a fixed world with the effects of uncertainty) the notion of arithmetical operations can be extended in this symmetry way beyond the notion of their vanishing into physicality only as an absolute singularity (that too generalized) of a field space.

Observation 4 - Structure and Numbers conceivable as a distinct reality from the physical has the same ambiguities as that of the tying of knots of worm holes in space as field.

Intuition 4 - As a metalanguage between these distinguished realitites any substitution of the symbols of one string of elements can match that of the other string of elements in all possible permutation orders, real or fanciful or only part solutions.

Intuition 4b - From this 2 + 2 formalism as reflections and condensing in a dynamic compactification based on the duality of the digits (an abstract behavior not unlike our observed behavior of the effects of dark matter) we are apt to confuse this simple level with the mechanism of consciousness. Here, at least, objective and subjective are ambiguous and beyond the strict distinction without merger necessarily nor for what is more or less the reality of it.

Intuition 4c - In the time like or heat like description of the source motions and sink rests (and conversely) especially with the gender of numbers (as a quasic property Euclid sensed related to the more strict even-odd perfect Mersenne primes) no all sequences as quasi-finite can be turned into any other sequence. Structure has a quasi-unique identity. But the nature of this in the quasi-infinite is the tying or untying of space in the universe.

Intuition 4d - These concepts suggest the universe or multiverse ideas, ambiguously so, itself is quasi-unique and we cannot duplicate meaningfully and independent structures or orders save in the temporal solutions, condensing and diverging symmetries beyond path choices in dynamic time.

Intuition 5d - With the even-odd and gender factoring and these distinctions- the totality of this holographic information with this distinction in mind is the ultimate conserved quantity as the physics of the universe.

Intuition 5e - These are of course the properties of such planes (quasic, Euclidean,complex, branes and so on) as the theory of matrices and determinants and the logic that underlies the properties of magic squares (both for stable and unstable solutions for integrated equations.)

Experiment 1 - ( Breakthroughs preceding theory) Between two layers of graphene a dope of Molybdenum wherein there is massive quantum tunneling [see science magazines yesterday] but is the directionality, Casmir like, explained from one layer to another as in the unexplained (by quantum theory) build up of charge to make lightning by contact of smaller particles? Is this an ambiguous property of the heat transfer as such of which the electromagnetic field falls out of the aggregate of physical and structural-numerical evolution? Given that theory or one like it before the fact this would be cited as evidence of the alternative SUSY. But it is a trivial state of things when adding more power to a machine to find particles assumed to go ever deeper and show up at higher energies and state of assumed timelines as if at least some local origin (thus strings and the Planck level) Thus it is a successful proof that may follow from the experiment by its virtual and even unbiased design. Until we find something not reachable or show it unknowable but can falsify the process to ever wider significant measure of doubt. Or in the wagers of chance bet it solidly found.

Intuition X1 - The structural reason for colors not recognizing certain combinations in the unit pixel that on inversion may represent discontinuity including something that initiates a quasi-looping process of universe as dynamics. Triality is not necessarily conserved even in the virtual infinite division of space and especially if any formulas tend toward the singularities in a rigid descending model - for again we do not forbid but can imagine distinctions quasi-connected over space and time, or even at action at a distance- thus an intelligibility with quasi-uniqueness that has to have depth as well as the span as if a totally unique entity. This seems true in our doubts of what eternity and physicality may mean to us as individuals- and philosophically this may explain some of our usual paradoxes of wonder about properties we have imagined would apply to a God. The Diety as such is certainly a state of non-necessity for the proposition, fundamentally and not so much as unnecessary as in the issue of necessity and free will ask perhaps of the universe itself as quasi-unique action.

Intuition X1b - Dirac's and Eddington's theories were equally bizarre after all- but together, now that is perhaps finally bizarre enough to get us beyond this diamond jubilee stalemate of foundational physics.

* * *

The Creative Scientific Universe (WMAP) L. Otto

PeSla Roo refers to the hot spots vaguely seen as if seas and continents, making sense of shapes giving them names as we do stars in a constellation or street and city designations from the speculations of Creative Philosophy in the short age of the COBE map data.

Of course many go beyond such data painting shapes and unifying theories each according to some inner logic of their vision and dreams as the sense of myth becomes the reality and the philosophy becomes the science or our minds and souls disconnect or come to clarity in awareness and coherence again, for some ideas themselves may evolve toward error and isolation to evaporate as dreams within dreams, unique the soul but chaotic as if that the only real as we experience, engage the spirit with physical and thought experiments.

In such growth and transitions that move things while some things fundamentally are or can be seen to stay fixed we can find some place for these explorations of alternative roots for theories- those especially accepted for awhile universally such as inflation theory- or they can fall out of our useful working theories more or less adsorbed into higher visions. That is where we seem to be at this era in so far as the question of the Higgs particle and mechanism- not so much the interpretations cannot prove a certain scientific reality but that there are cautious doubts about the sanity of such metaphysics before the map of the very small like that of the universe at large with finer eyes begins to make real sense so far as a philosophy.

But can we see beyond our self imaginings and logical structures and shifting or vanishing meanings of foundational concepts and words we put like pearls together in codes- what genes we find or lack if science is to be blind in its objectivity?

No theory or belief likes to die. But the truth seems to be that even with overwhelming evidence everything does. Something in me ultimately questions the truth of this if we take things as science and so weigh them in our finite thoughts. Nor do I think, the poet in me at least, that I am imprinted upon as a child or seduced as an adult from the literature of the Good Book, although I am aware that the separation of the land and the sea is a very powerful image in Genesis even if interpreted in one's own special way that can be dissonant or irrelevant as error or even a stumbled upon truth, the truth of which we may never directly know. Too much for our shared language grounding English as the King James, as with all spiritual literature, is subject to great loss in the translation, and creeping loss in life's boredom at some first passion if our aging is the reality if not the reflection of how old we think we feel.

* * * *

OXLampion o2.10.12

Intuitively we imagine the idea of continuity as if a sense of touch, at some location or at a distance perceptually- as a definition of geometry this role seems reversed for sight- as a pen that does not leave contact in the writing on the paper.

This vague and common experience seems to justify the need in string theory, given as an example, for the increase of an added dimension. "so the strings have wiggle room to vibrate." Now, there may be some deep reasons under this vague popularization metaphor beyond obvious need to communicate the worth of science as important to everyone.

So, I will use this philosophic axiom or reasoning of the introduction of abstract dimensions to express the deep and shallow need to the gods of theory and the common folk for this little light of understanding.

The structure of a logical and theoretical system, seems to need wiggle room in the generalization of dimensional concepts such as that of generations that can begin as some dimensional minimal level. Such a general picture of continuity cannot describe the picture of things as linearity alone, nor as some vague metaphysics of rigid existence or non-existence as the arithmetic of 1 v 0 called non-linear but this not simply meant where things match to a zero balance in the notion of some place as just a matter of dimensions as powers or as the inverses of powers.

In particular, the doubling of things, here also he unexpected virial differences not taken to the next generational level of the kinetic and potential difference of duality doubling and halving. But the process is intelligible as in the complex space and apparently as dualism at least is without dimensional number limits. Such limits arise in the totality considered intelligible and not necessarily vaguely non-linear nor can such always be reduced on the same level of logic to explicit linear reductions if any idea of such reduction is reality of a physical (or even mental) system.

How can the continuity of the Power set, 2^n exist beyond the common and lower dimensions that so extend to great dimensions without generational wiggle room? How can they exist beyond the idea of systems that seem as numbers reaching a point of vanishing algebraic properties with any such duplication without the quasic view of dimensions? Of which it is clear that 16 or 24 or whatever dimensions are needed for example the rigid rotations having wiggle room for continuous and rotation.

Let us not confuse such space as mystically quantum hidden in the symmetries of the discrete, in the example of say duplicating 16 dimensions as shadows not beyond the properties of quasic space beyond 8 dimensions- clearly, we gain little by an inverse reductionism onto the span or macro scale and count of things by treating spin as if somewhere meeting its common sense of spinning objects but limited to physical properties dismissed as the upper state of things as simply generalized to being laws of physics everywhere scalar. Although, from this higher view such notions have their place and utility- we looking down into the dream then rather than being blind in the awareness of being in the flow of the dream as to its design, destinations, and meaningful sorting of information and mechanics for action or purpose.

* * * * *

Year of the Dragon, Neptune, & New Science

2012-02-08T11:07:00.003-06:00

Year of the Dragon, Neptune, & New Science L. Edgar Otto

I had something post but the computer will not accept wps. I working off-line for awhile.

* * * * *

Access back- This was the original posting intended:

Lampion 02.07.12 Beyond Structural Arts for the String Theory L. Edgar Otto

So, with administrative access to the computer I find so many things I can do with it. For one thing there is a history going back a few years of all the downloaded photos, graphics, and copies of texts. It is much easier to combine all the earlier graphics and I rapidly made a dozen at this optimal resolution. I feel a little behind the technology- wanting to see the heart of how it works close to the assembly code and pixels but some of these programs for other things could be useful for mathematical projects.

But from the Philosophy of it all I see my growth since my blog-spot posting, a torrent of ideas and information the same symbols or metaphors repeated even if not clearly in a new context and needed coined working words where just another color for the same idea. I also noticed it in the development over the same time like by bogglers I have encountered here and saw in this matter of communication of their ideas the also seem to be saying things in quite familiar metaphors with ideas not as clear as the style or interpretation of their language. But do we want light that magically enlightens us or do we want the discussion of the hard philosophy and facts.. Let us hope we make more progress within ourselves and to others- even the general public to take to heart not be convinced vaguely.

* * * * *

Higher Dimensional Printing (4D and Beyond)

2012-02-07T11:38:00.007-06:00

Lampion 02-07-12 4D Printing

This was my single thought to consider along the lines of how I see the dimensions last night and today. But I bought one of the coffee shop computers and am trying to set it up and exploring the features hard to do with the distractions in the shop. I also recovered certain things from the computer itself, texts and photos. I may go on line with one of them- looking back in the evolving and slow but dramatic leaps of this creative blog is like analyzing the chess moves after the game. Yet so much is thinking forward so I have strengths and weaknesses to consider. I tend to find a level of technology, razors, pens, and yes the Vista level graphics... I have to catch up on what is the internet trend - perhaps some of the domain to go up for the arts and so on, finally. I find it hard to take in all the diagrams all at once- but I do seem to have them in my memory- even some of the revisions.

* * * * *

My Status today on facebook:

I'm Back ! This is not the 90's nor the decade after the Millennium. Some of us can see a few moves ahead- and some vanish into nostalgic technologies before they are equal to them only to shout down others in bygone eras. In this decade we have lost more than manufacturing in the USA. We have lost the soul of the people and become as mean spirited as the songs we sing against. But, I cannot be pessimistic... there is no pill for this save hope for truth, and a little honesty. If any want to join me in some project you are most welcome- but the game will fail if the design and myself make the decisions- design is the leader- if we are to be the queen on the board.

Lifework as a concept? Sometimes in looking back we still are engaged in our work of the future- not sitting on dried brown flowers peeking thru the snow in winter and expecting on that to be living on our laurels. That is why perhaps, spring has its mirror of passion returned hidden in it sorrow- just as a brisk October morning has in its heart the warmth of spring and light to come of which we can bear the vision.

I guess off line is like an archeology of ourselves when things are quite enough and who hears anyway? It is a story read again with new insight and the possibility of a universal drama for although the history is important it should not take from the living it. At singularity it is not clear that our self is the proper study of ourself- but sometimes the best work gets done in solitude and if we survive loss we shall be ready to shout to the universe again something new at singularity. Not for the sake of shouting nor the care for our character that in the fiction takes on a life of its own- but for the vision of the possible and perhaps the impossible- and this is a lot more to see than walk as if on the distant stars- more than the diviners and gamblers and insurers, more than the predictions of science- Love you see feels safest when it is full of happy surprises, and we do not sink so low that we cannot become aware just how high our spirits are or low in the worlds and our fellows rejections. With this too, we begin to learn from history and no longer fall for the empty myths of others who themselves have not learned to live in their own time, own skin, or own dreams.
But who recalls the bones in the battleground? Vengeance is dramatic and pointless in the outcome in the greater scheme of things, a tease really that gets out of hand, the wheel of it comes back to crush one, rather it does so before the wheel rolls in its infinite velocity, putting on the the moral breaks if they do not burn out will sometimes, hidden but here and not necessarily in the hereafter, burns the evil and the smart but stupid ones bleeding years.

This is universal and perhaps the origin of our idea of rights such as to found a family or stage a revolution- that is the danger in unbalanced government will sooner or later be addressed by those who deliver the warrant against brothers and sisters, separating children from mothers by arbitrary immoral law (such as the Spanish illegal immigrants here). The middle class should not be in the buying of children business then say there is no class war and this strong class essential for a democracy. Drugged for the arrest of those the line of duty overlooked, entrapment's and enticements, or love and war, greed and cat fights- woe to those who are on the front line of repression for they will be first to fall if our situation becomes again a civil war by the culture only centered self-righteous who kick in doors and burn down churches in the name of domestic violence.

Of such history I have not forgotten. It is not the continued writing or recovery as if a therapy that has protected my core from loss- it is the great and creative vision of science and the comfort of perplexity of creative philosophies.

Yet, with a little tough love one way out of all the tiredness of putting up with half-brains is the trying to raise them up to a better world and level- no easy task from either side.

* * * * *
vixra org drama just caught my eye

I posted this:

L. Edgar Otto says:
February 7, 2012 at 6:44 pm

Sometimes a rumor has its grounding in our subconscious intuitions and what forbids it cannot be true?

I am not saying it is true but thanks for the dynamics of the concepts (scalars as bosons as the only view aside)

No one will catch you out on this most noble scientific experiment and research, it is not about prestige but actually going to Mars.

Now, consider this… from my view the gene code begins to be read where something stable and solid starts… and there are the stops. But in an odd way what is start is the stop when we add to the quantum formula the few adjusted inverses.

Now, the issue is what is the mechanism of mass anyway- and the standard model has its successes on some levels.

ThePeSla

* * * *

Lampion 02.02.12 Nine Men Morris Triality (Calyptic Cubes)

2012-02-06T11:12:00.005-06:00

Lampion 02.02.12 Nine Men Morris Triality (Calyptic Cubes) L. Edgar Otto 02-06-12

Calypton- given sufficient structural complexity (three space in general from the logical and intelligible visualization of the algebra) we find a Triality space (Hessian polytopes?) wherein the distinction between what is fermion or boson, things that match or are in opposition is not the fundamental pattern but the pattern itself as the fundamental idea. Yet on this level the surface of 6 cubes and a complex shadow of them (thus we justify Rowlands systems of applying two sets of complex numbers to the quantum formalism but not his clear distinction in a quasi-finite world as to what is conserved or not in the patterns mapped CPT(&M?) in the applied interpretations as a physicality). The surfaces (half) match while the internal or calyptic symmetries are in opposition. We find naturally the 12 and 5 of Dirac in the extended Orthogonal quasic matrix of 24 by 24, and see the significance in these division spaces of the real and imaginary zero roots for which Kea et al have long and subtly investigated. Clearly, the idea of what is superimposed or merged, capable of bilateral symmetry breaking or a unitary pole or condensation, is at some lower level a very vague concept but more fundamental. I suggest (and forgive my mere notes and some errors in the page for it is only the first of so many pages completed or to be completed for the right sense of visualization, computing these would be a good mental exercise for those not familiar with the visual methods of higher dimensions and symmetry principles.) the game of 9 men Morris, a 3^n situation and which mystically for me is the compass passing time on Viking ships as they played the game... Find the mill or three therein until the shells of space and hidden space are filled in their vacua. Even the virtual center may have this deeper uncertainty of what is condensed or separate but superimposed (for there is a 25th hidden point in the center in a world perhaps where we may imagine there are no points as such in the dimensions.

From the Calyptic view then, I imagine the six cubes of 9 colors any four that matches the same color on the 36 faces to be the 48 of three space cube rotations and doubly hidden in the duplication by the Complex duals idea we find abstractly a system of 12 of such cubes in the formalism of which mathematics does apply but in what seems a different way, such we cannot say on this level of dialog does the pattern or math determine the physics or the physical state what is possible in the patterns? But of course, even in the n-dimensional bilaterial n-symmetry of structures it is that three things involved is a little more fundamental or closer to the ambiguous unit quasic pixel real or virtual modified inverses than all the orthogons and their generalizations. Parity for example had more fundamental dynamics of some change of sign.

(To make clearer coming here later- the fermions are hidden in the bosonic structure in the calyptic cubes- that is, in the general transitivity over a surface within the nucleus we do not have a deterministic and rigid system necessarily with a rigid historical center nor origin as a world view, exclusively, these can be relaxed defaults that endure as if a time direction. The assumption that things should be developed as theory along these lines and strictly characterized and separated is not fundamental- only from some view can we think the weak force for example in the discrete-continuous rigid distinction that it is greater than the strong force in the model. CPT symmetries will not be so rigidly conserved or not in any combination. I find it interesting Pitkanen's observation to hammed on the general idea of 5 seven items- which is of course part of the standard geometry and general quasic picture thus QM. But why make this geometry so rigid in terms of symmetry breaking if that is a matter of formulism of views less than a unified theory, in view of calypton space and quasi-finitude? Deep memory and consciousness have to be defined beyond the quantum formalism- but to say it applies at all on the rigid origin assumed scale of things is questioned a lot especially by those who are on only one level of things in their discipline- such as informatics in DNA does not to them connect beyond the protein level as part of a relevant new physics as algebra and geometry.)

* * * * *

Lampions (Holofractors)

2012-02-05T11:20:00.003-06:00

Lampions (Holofractors) L. Edgar Otto Feb. 8, 2012

Lampion 02.04.12.A

A star in the Casmir Zone (five fold symmetry flat space) around a creative black hole entity, from our view, is short lived (ten million years, science daily. But from their view time is its natural length, time enough for life?

Lampion 02.04.12.B

In this sense, this linear inverse added to the gauge (as the natural result of quasic unit scale invariant initial cell pixel) spherical harmonics on point descriptions (as if there are no points as such (a part is that which hath no point- leaving perhaps the landscape of linear strings) condensed phases in the hyperentanglement and poles as independent of even chirality as a key to (galaxy and other) creation - all stars exist in this graphene like layer and thus a measure of quasi-finite thermodynamic space effects. (in this space over a span as broken down over elliptic formalism in theory an oil drop rises or falls with the heat and temperature in two directions not focused into a Saturn like ring and the general principle is grounded that transitions radiate or something falling in gravity can become hot.) I imagine a better fountain pen that may employ these principles including the mysteries of capillary action and the fine Japanese ink differences in glass beads in glass beads for the ink- in a sense we observe, not preoccupied with how quantum things become classical as an issue, global effects that takes our familiar scale naturally into the depths of what happens in the atomic microcosm and the nature of structure- for it is here that we find the debate stop or top for example at singularity, as to the role of math determining the physics or vice verse).

Lampion 02.04.12.C

This, from solutions and a certain sense of n-dimensional n-symmetry (I first conceived of in 1064 while viewing stereo effects thru a spinning fan at lightning but in a vague but later significant intuition telling someone actually when excited about the concept- I mean should my military experience come to make me disappear) for additions and differential equations- seems to me to explain the immortality of the proton state as he quasi-minimum partition of 5 fold brane as a round or flat Graphene-Casmir space as if in self sustaining soliton like cycles of duality once created as nuclei isolated from the rest of our local universe - entropy as unitary from some view... thus what is in that space region of a proton is responsive to and an analog of our idea of what is gravity.

From this view the structural duality envisioned as polyhedra duals is the oscillation or fields that occur between material objects thus the fields as a more foundational description. It is about the deeper idea of quasi-finite action.

Clearly, in the 5 fold quasic patterns of numbers scale invariant and generational on abstract fixed and moving levels this encompasses the expanded models of hyper-entanglement in the proton not merely as a superposition of the mathematics of two hydrogen spherics and for the superentanglement beyond quantum ideas the shadow super kernal dark nucleus (beginning at 16 time like dimensions in the usual sense) adsorbs the fine structure constant differences of inters group numbers in a sort of shadow entropy. Thus of the 8 3D four space super kernels unfolding the hypercube we add one or two more structures (these can be viewed as the same or as a fixed or moving addition or current where the up or down geometrically dualistic can be exchanged. Of course this only takes things up to the stop and top (see Lubos post on this today) frontier of the known standard theory and rules of quantum physics like the unity quasic pixel structural inverse as an addition to such equations and their linearity or powers of linearity. This sort of question justifies the concern and the remarkable coincidences of numbers to justify their roles for example in the views of Kea and all. In a sense too Lubos suggest some appeal as cooperation between the string and loopy views in such spaces.

The holofraction (break and whole) as a simple series of pipe work in relation to the grounding in digital process viewing the infinite is also our familiar observation of fluid properties even when we cannot see but imagine what makes the models work even beyond the micro-scale. The above properties of the unfolded three cubes in the hypercube extended (initially into ten dimensions) certainly is the observed aromatic properties possible in the layering of DNA codon bases as well at least a super-entanglement reading and expression of the DNA structures. This goes radically a little further than say Penrose's concepts of signals and quantanglement and most likely raises paradoxical issues of the grounding and endurance for the nature of relation between memory and the vacua.

* * *

This is part of a reply to Ulla for her excellent question on memory in Pitkanen's last blog- a part that by thought on the subject- not the personal view of this process of creative theory- helped cleared up but extended the simple lampions of this post:

Lubos discusses this today but short of all being an ultimate uncertainty these theorist have insufficient understanding of the foundations. We are learning. Between that point and some shell falls the wide world of hyperentanglement (and yes there is more than Kea and Pitkanen seeing it have the words for- perhaps superentanglement). When we get the wider picture and all of existence itself is within that difference from the point to the sphere- therein you will find the active memory and further questions as to what that means for our uniqueness and its endurance.

It is such deep forms of entanglement that is the stuff of memory made out of the vacuum and quite beyond the simple idea of zero point and quantum stuff- for in a wider view we can stack such rings of atoms made of things like carbon, embed them in glass that even if breaks is not sharp and does not cut- embed them fractally like a fine Japanese ink of beads and ink in colors for some very fine distinctions beyond the human eye. And we can put them into layers like of course DNA but that as seemingly material is still not enough to contain our wide world of dreams and thoughts and memory.

One should recall that this model may be extended as the multiverse model itself while most theories do not consider this as a general option - so we reach again in the philosophy issues of geometry, uniqueness, and how we approach the creative frontiers of another level of theory, the universe as holofractor- then again the view is so general it is unclear where such derivative views or models begin or end as if this excluded or includes other things from a total theory.

* * * *

Lampions (Sci-Fi) SphereDreams of a Doubled Star

2012-02-04T14:26:00.005-06:00

Lampions (Sci-Fi) SphereDreams of a Doubled Star L. Edgar Otto Feb. 4, 2012

Lampion 02.03.12 sf1

Olney & Orenda came across an Oriental fisherman on the pier of his house in the fog & soon realized there are copies of this scene up, down & staggered, all around. Like they have long playe as children on the endless beach & understanding this new world in the Great Landscape was like a spacious wallpaper, they jumped down in chasing each other coming over & over again to the same startled fisherman in what seemed the same scene.

But they soon discovered it was much easier to jump down rather than upward & this worried them, made them ask if each level was different & if they could become trapped or lost on some level of their endless fall.

02.03.12 sf2

So they decided to linger at the next scene & talk with the bearded gentleman who gestured to his daughter to bring tea, then spoke to them.

"What fine fish," he said in amiable jest, " have jumped on to my pier out of the water.."

"Honored Sir," Olney said as Orenda politely went to help Su Kodu, the daughter with the tea service,"We have jumped a thousand times find so many copies of your house & pier, are you unique or but one shadow?"

"Bowing Guest, did you see as many copies of yourself there? Do you think, in my peace here I fish for nothing in the fog?"

02.03.12 sf3

After tea Orenda, trying to find out something about this wallpaper world & people, houses with walls of paper, sat under the veranda & eased Su Kodu into telling her life story & view of her world.

"Well, I know I've been unhappy here for once I jumped down to the next hous only I was the same daughter there. I do not know if my spirit, my illusion of a unique self goes back to the house I left - but I expect this so. For the next old father left his fishing pole to ask me why I became so dark & frantic in my mood. He said in all time he never saw that before.

"I did not want to confide with this stranger so I leaped back & climbed up the pier to the big grin of my father. He said,
"Daughter, you continue to surprise me in your antics. You have been so happy lately that has been a great comforting change for my rusting old bones."

"So, I let my fingers slip off the pier, looking for freedom or escape, in flight an illusion awhile that I would not find the same old house I knew would be on the other side. Then I just fell & fell, the households growing fewer until I reached beyond some level where it was easy still to jump from place to place on the same plane. Then, it took so very long to find a house in the fog, only a few of them rare and stray beyond the galaxy of fisher folk, so I clung there. After a very long time I confided in my father who had very little to say most of the time."
"Do not despair, daughter. Eventually our house will rise again to reach the great galactic band & teeming city. Even to rise above where no stray stars can rise, atop the rigid hexagon of Saturn, one snowflake yet the many. The great sphere of us as one, yet the light once clear like snowflakes pointing, reflecting everywhere, becomes foggy white. The all such cycles & the cycle of it all begins again."

02.03.12 sf4

Olney took Orenda's hand, "I think we should move on from this place, the Source is calling us back for suppertime - that old shawled lady is so hard to hear and hard of hearing in the conch shells or in the wind of our dunes. Though the season's warm it can get cold after dark & she will never scold us but lets us know she does not like to wait so late to scry the sky & make up stories about the Twins and Dipper through the bubbles of air within her glass paper weight, half a crystal ball, so she says but really I was there when she bought it for a nickel at the thrift store."

"Oh, Oln, when she lays those tattered cards down late for her bed, her arthritis hands pain too dark a picture of this world. It colors our adventures the next day & we walk a high wire having to pay too much attention not to fall, find out if we like fish in her hair net are caught where she holds back the sky & before we wake up finding out the end in our bad dream. But the worlds are so wide & varied she cannot take too much from our adventures. Still, would we just fly through the air with the greatest of ease my daring young man beyond our trapeze. How shall we get home?

"Sweet child, forever young, yet born an ancient one just like her, today we will walk, or rather run. The inexhaustible force of tides will not weigh us down, our buoyancy renewed under water. Nor will the shifting sand hold back our feet. The gods are holding council as if not to be disturbed in the wild on the gallop like so many colored unicorns. They will not notice when we turn the oceans into land & islands into seas. So we may slip through the Sound, an inland island at the shore of the archipelago barrier lakes, find her cabin near the village."

02.03.12 sf5

When they came to her cabin they found a rain barrel. She was swimming in it in the form of a thousand mosquito larvae. Yet she was in a joyful form on the surface of the water, her song a reflection of a thousand stars & fireflies - save for one discordant note, a young oriental girl, a raindrop making circles on the water & and waves that as if made only of ghostly forms passed unknowingly through themselves. The fireflies broke into vibrations as the light connecting again as they gathered at her origin to show the long way and resolve the note as with any spice of stumbling error back to sign, to begin her song again in the loops of her decisions & vanishing lyric & heart, her "I shant get home tonight."

Wherefore Olney turned the land back into the sea . He & Orenda walked into the door seeing the Shawled Lady baking & stirring chocolate for pralines, the table set with teacups full of warm apple cider and cinnamon.

"Ah, just on time. Be sure to chew the mullet well & watch out for needle sharp fish-comb bones."

Olney & Orenda looked at each other holding back guilty smiles as if some trick played on the old lady who cared for them freely, so often the children seen but not heard imagined what the elders believed, things beyond their simple lives as the final word from the gods- so to lay ground for future dreams in the procession of all doubled stars. The old lady did not seem concerned that the children were dizzy eating the whole and yet inexhaustible gingerbread house of powdered sugars and colored canes of candy.

02.04.12 sf1

Just before dawn when the violet & red pale rainbow of the Belt of Venus shrunk & faded into the cyan of a cloudless sky leaving the solitary Morning Star, Olney & Orenda left to fly as butterflies over the bog reeds & drink the wild flowers. Mars had faded first & as if a cloud moves away from the sun all the stars evaporated all at once along with the morning dew. Mars, like Olney in another parallel & mundane place was in retrograde he on leave back, the Red Horseman of war usually drunk with its fear & faith or on some mission to find a crack into his lady's dancing pinwheel pentagram, her angled wings drew over time, her clock almost perfection in the shifting orbit around the sun she etched into the sky.

So these two could only come so close, both half of some ideal dream once one, brother & sister, a double star, & being outside time & generations each to the other were their ancestors & offspring.

Yet this way too was an aid to their explorations by the bring sun that kissed to crescents the planets & the moon, passion the gray line of earth-shine- or they could circumnavigate by the dark star that slowed the light & changed the tide in the Earth's core.

But just as they could see the Shawled Lady in all the fireflies in the rain barrel they could only gaze and dance for each other at a distance with compound eyes.

"Gee, Rendee, you are so creative in your dance," Oln teased her, "Remember when Mercury played peek-a-boo above the horizon at belt fall you in your lover's single eye?"

"Oh Oln, we sisters cuddled- I half forgot - that was such a long time ago."

02.04.12 sf2

Doing nothing once can be consumed by the growing crowd of the innumerable souls & stars for nothing remains still in the universe, never far from its violence.

Raising your voice monkey mouthed & not a heeling dog who sees behind your smile a threat of clamping teeth soon in fanfare or in secrecy you vanish from the herd.

Nor can one win lukewarm, life passes you by in the mainstream, you race in the middle, half-hearted, not an upstart leader with oaths and guidons, nor a straggler who is lost, their way alone, letting, perhaps wanting, life to just pass by.

Not even government of men knowing well those dreamers who made possible victory over the barbarians by their machines of war can protect them against the centurion overseers with swords & whips exuberant beyond the law, they deep down afraid of ghosts & shadows, fanatics armed with false gods, or the sorcerers, diviners, astrologers, the fools without the true wisdom preemptively put to sleep again as traitors, threats to the state.

One can hide on the lam & move freely through the Noir dimensions of the underworld, bounce from black hole to black hole too small to fail, be noticed save by a chance encounter with the tax & toll men building walls. Yet even then consuming the general
capital too big to fail, they are doomed to be no more than petty thieves.

"Olney, I am proud you go to war, but I want you not to."

"Orendee, I need there your cloak of needing me to carry through. Evil has a soul of its own until all souls are exhausted, tired. But never be just my camp follower, be a warrior if you desire or as the Amazon floods is the renewal of the rain forest, fertile creator of life & future soldiers, defender & carrier of the collective wisdom, culture, even a Typhoid Mary in defense of children, a solitary single she bear to the chest beating spear rattling men, Souls lost into each other in the end & endless rise to gain life's unreachable quest for joy and sorrow, we puppets of desire & Love's hallucinations.

And, Rendee, the war is never for what it claims in our donning of our father's uniforms, causes, & flags- but the war for the West. We shall explore there, seek for it if I return from the lottery if I do or are doomed to many times- if there is a West left in our shrinking dreams of new frontiers."

* * * * *

Lampions (Bits of Wisdom) Continued Updates

2012-02-03T15:59:00.005-06:00

Lampions (Bits of Wisdom) Continued Updates to keep in touch with Pe Sla blog updates. These will be labeled by the date as in Lampion 02.02.12.A L. Edgar Otto 02-03-12 Such updates may not always carry a photo or figure beyond the text. So the blog continues but as a slower pace. (At least that is my plan for the moment.)

Lampion 02.02.12a - From the quasi-continuous view meaning and information are conjugate or even can be interchanged. The question then of interpretations of quantum theory in relation to consciousness applies. Consciousness can seem to impel or delay the physical processes that in effect our desire and actions for enquirey and knowing, driven to accumulate stuff or experience purpose as meaningful, makes us the "mediators" between such contemplative general plane and sphereical objects- Thus in the unities we find where information and meaning so relate- we as humans are theorist's including renewals and desire to replicate- but not necessarily to incorporate false entropy's.

Lampion 02.02.12b - I find suggestive patterns in the attempt to relate the periodic table and the chemical properties to the Sudoku trialities (as if the filling of the electron shells regardless of the irregularities of the configuration due to heat- but cannot get beyond the very suggestive but replete numerology's. In a sense the quasic patterns over 512 bi-regions repeat these properties as if there is at least an abstract supersymmetric "kernel" even on the level of the QED. Tricornered physics suggest further there are mass spaces, gender number spaces, and the quasic centers in the three physics mapped into powers of three over so many generations. Such concepts may be what we structurally mean by time-like dimensions but in a more general way. Beyond atomic number Z=5 to z=54 the Z number summing to 120 from He is divisible by 3. 2, 10, 9, 18, 27, 43, 59. In what time-like sense can the Z number exceed Unbinilium (120) for the sum of all these numbers is 256. In a deep sense there can be 40 abstract 5space kernel objects in filling the totality- but I am not sure what the role of these are as field or particle if they so exist. In a theoretical sense one could imagine of the tricornered physics they have imaginary counter parts. But it is not clear how in compatification we can say we slice 6 space into two three space hidden dimensions as a solid physical principle of space and the vacuum.

Lampion 02.02.12c - It would be quite interesting, for (nano?) technology to relate the graphene layers (aromatically) to the doping (aromatically) one also finds in the cage of Buckyballs...

* * *
As it was on today's (not as short as I thought) topic I post here because of Pitkanens lampion on p-adics and consciousness Here the following comment:

Matti,

In formulas involve the natural log we have a limit of the accuracy in the computation of the tables and level of error. In a sense this is not a simple idea of limit.

In the ideal or absolute case I see your point on the utility of this for to ground consciousness as it say relates to QED from on view. We in the low dimensions and harmonics can sometimes go beyond the bounds that confines the primes and ignore this in the higher reaches and deeper accuracies.

For me, errors, noise, so on... is the general idea of meaning and information being conjugate (more of one less than the other) as the practical use by Shannon in signal transmission over noise and the entropy of natural communications (initial letters and so on). But I am a bit more radical than that in that from a higher view of things information (data) and meaning (purpose) can be interchanged.

The PeSla

* * * * *

Half Singularities in the Year of the Dragon

2012-02-02T09:52:00.011-06:00

Half Singularities in the Year of the Dragon L. Edgar Otto 02-02-12

Sometimes the artist in me flies off into the abstract landscape and far from the discipline of formal presentations yet I am aware of the processes and way. So color can be distracting, color pencils disrupts the needed acetic clarity of black ink. But lately the colors speak volumes and enhance the visions. Even the abstract work above from my roommate, painted with his emotional states evidently and without a title or sense of direction of meaning, I can paint into the vivid colors images that make more concrete sense- I suggested to him this could be called the Year of the Dragon if there is no title anyway, for I saw the upper left hand as a ninja and later on the lower half the idea of a dragon.

If I want to totally rest and take a break from my preoccupation with the new physics I should not pic up a pen nor open any book of substance- nor should I bond to closely with events or those on which despite myself I depend emotionally on others- in ways of course that I find more clarity in seeing myself and in the deeper connections at least between people if not the absurd idea we sometimes entertain that matter, brick walls, contain some form of the world memories. In all this I know only too well the isolation of ideas, the uniqueness of my individuality shown to myself for its lack of some depth and purposes other than the mundane that exists on the familiar level while the living. On the other hand it shows the great potential and the first few dreams of the cosmos as primitive but highly significant in the development as something in a living thing integrates over time.

So, in terse colors on the concepts of the quasic grid (it may not be clear that it does involve 2 and 3 and thus the ancient idea of Mersenne primes and gender- so today peeking into Kea's take on the supposed single evidence for new physics I see a link to Pitkanen- and would his take on primes be very much clearer.) I am discussing here those aspects as a way the quasic grid, and the Sukodu like or threeness of the grid itself on the dualism involved in general space and physics of that contained in the grid - my epsilon-delta idea- the ideas of the role of the relativities. Even if there were not relativity the quasic grid given adept use and the evolving understanding, in a quasi-continuous world if that can be defined and seems it has to be if we aim to resolve or unify the views of the two core physics- then such ideas would have been suggested perhaps as side views or thoughts that are no longer a motivation to find new science but great ideas overlooked by history.

I use the potential infinity sign- it apples to the main diagonals and the boundaries and the centers of these planes- and in a sense I divide it by half- there can be as always develops better notations- the potential infinity sign and not my alpha and beta abstract directions (via gender and even-oddness) of the quasic grid. One thing for sure we can see the zero like division more as a dynamic division rather than some imagined potential as a limit... in that sense, we do imagine a corpuscular world which of course can serve as quintessence as the alternate view or part of the total view so as to define things without dark energy- matter concepts. It then still part of the overall or Omnium view.

Likewise, concepts of spin or twists, momenta on some level considered together, and the angles of things- more of the obvious use of the complex number field ideas, the phaseonium like concepts need not be foundational either- yet are part of the view. In any case all these approaches can work intelligibly together.

So we see the idea of these half singularities which can as fields or diagonal rays reverse upon themselves. Two photons in opposite directions abstractly describing twice the distance if not the speed- for it is the half singularity or the potential dynamic quasi-finite structure in the free vacuum that changes time to rest and kinematics of action to some horizon of changes and reversals or in the idea of the principle of equivalence, that twin which does not age as fast is the reference frame undergoing acceleration. This seems to apply globally phase wise and not just the consideration of a single vector upon some center.

But in a sense, general space seems to be (in the quasic plane or brane view) composed of only half singularities. We designate some position as if an origin or a point reference for all the frames. The deep question remains then- abstractly- is there a single singularity of the totality of the sea of them on the micro-scale or is there only a relative sea of half singularities? What does this mean ultimately for our general viewpoints on space and modeling of the physical world?

Now, terse my illustration of the intervals (and half intervals as the one in violet that goes of the page...) these can be thought of as also up and down drawn and as the various diagonals and what these involve for our usual matrix methods. The quasic grid of course can be extended into the span as well as the depth and the units there can be put in sequences or order or these, especially in the foundational idea of complex number mapping into space make use of ideas like at the octonions the formalism is (thankfully) broken as a complete description- that and we seem to run out of the usual definite algebraic properties for the usual explicit generalizations.

Now, such foundational views for physics would certainly say that we can imagine the ideas of higher dimensions, and of super-symmetry as fictitious if described as such limited fields in our rigidly familiar views or even as completely cloudy random views. String theory (to use the word loosely, includes branes etc.) is thought to be a needed generalization of quantum theory. But as the innate ability of we humans to relate to the general laws of nature and to our own evolved structures, in the rant posted here of yesterday on a crackpot vision of the multiplicity of time on the earth (all the general conflict of poles and spinning poles and monopoles) we on some level, as if a sort of fictional intelligibility as good as fact- may very well question the vague generalization of the higher rotations and spins that require really any such string concept in symmetry greater than three or possibly four space. What is left of such string phases from there to any sort of limit or singularity but something that remains as questionable as such disembodied string theories or as Kea calls them "fairy fields."? Of course as the positional code which is the simplified quasic grid makes clear it is a matter of clearing up our further facts and scientific conclusions even from experiments of a more general or new physics of which the evidence can be in theory interpreted out of the running to the extent the mystics can falsely put their agendas into the evidence and control of the information and data for the gullible, in the running.

So the question of such singularities or half-singularities or complexes of them as the nature of the unknown, unseen, and the vacuum is also a cultural question as to what we are and how we think and how the world will turn out at least technically.

* * * * *

Ulla sent me this link Here... looks to me like my speculations on the layers of graphene and the Casmir effects were not so far fetched after all :-)

Note the date jan. 31 on this pdf paper and my post of jan. 30 here- but also the lens aspect of things came early in this blog as also I imagine the years of preparation for such research and time for formal publication of which we do not have it seems clear awareness even in this age of rapid communication our independent researches. A time-line I suggest in above would go far in the learning of physics and would speed up what new areas we could then imagine.

BTW, I did get two songs down in the music at least...

Also this on the sciencedaily today which comes closer to my view and simple dabbling with the oil in alcohol and water simple experiment (only the ring is a bulge in that area of switching such that the dark or noir objects can become creative in the star producing sense... QED so perhaps these simple science fair demonstrations are not so simple after all- provided we can trust the intelligibility of computer simulations--- or at least know why we can.

* * * * *

Will Groundhogs still Winter not seeing His Shadow

2012-02-01T14:55:00.004-06:00

Will Groundhogs still Winter not seeing His Shadow L. Edgar Otto 02-01-12

I had a few relaxed and follow up thoughts, the dynamics in normal space in which the Feynman diagrams and their generalization for the new physics is possible and intelligible. But what is intelligible in the raw and simple counting does not always mean it represents a true state of the new physics, not even a numerology that adds up may make any sort of predictions to regard scientific- nor while it is possible to ignore some concepts or push them far away- say the evidence of new physics in a collider- this too has no bearing on the experimental or theoretical facts. There may be uncertainty before the explicit data and knowing, this does not mean the fact of something is or is not there in that knowing. Our logic too in its core and foundational designs shares with this view of deeper landscapes of reality the ability to reinforce as well as distinguish some things at the frontier of our cognitive dissonance.

(I do which in the defense of some of the alternative views there was not so much ranting complaining- it is not entertaining beyond a certain point- and it is pointless to label the apes with what they cannot understand- but this is a mediocre observation, a four edged sword itself to which the author of the article sent to me uses the same rhetoric- rather than present a positive and useful viewpoint- in which such rants may be important for original thought processes and may be forgiven- and so what if the apes forget it all.)

In the numerology note particularly the 96 based on the 24 hours... The nature of human thought at this juncture of history has to deal with these indiscernible discernibles. Now, I have seen, early on in the internet, a few sights that are endorsing this sort of crackpot argument- so yes Jesse I am interested, we should talk about it in the coffee shop over the new technologies in photography.

From our facebook:

Jackson Lund
thought you might think this is interesting
Time Cube
www.timecube.com

My reply:

L. Edgar Otto This sort of thing has been what is wrong with trying to bring knowledge to many on the internet. Again I ask, how many days are on the earth? But this is not asked for some reason to support such crackpot confusions. These people have a reasoning that one can see in the depths of real physics, of the new physics, but it is really about their psychology (the matrix movie was a good analogy for this author to use. It gives legitimate speculators on cosmology a bad name and does a disservice to progress in technology and enquiry. The world is coincidentally intelligible so the numbers add up- the cognitive dissonance of the authors are lacking something in the big picture.

* * * *

My habit has been not to leave the blog at the end of an intense month but to begin at least the first day of the next month...

In my general scenario- and I feel I may have not communicated it well, but should at least add this for those who may have interest and understand the quasic ideas. I feel after relaxation and rest, but unfortunately no new music, and renewal of some friendships that I too was overly strict in some of my diagrams and interpretations- in that yesterday's speculation (I hesitated to post and that has been a pattern here on this creative blog) gives way to a sense of certainty, reality, and I add two strange new ideas as well as the description of the brane-quasic landscape and dynamics of post-quantum physics.

*1 The One-half law of thermodynamics: An isolated systems with deeper connections there centered or diffuse or aggregated in proximity, by force or fall, will tend to add to the coherence and unity of such a system, especially the organic, all at some level of complexity and some level of application of generational ordering.

*2 The Noirium Center Eras: By dark matter as if a dark atom on the same level of quasicity, as if an equivalence to the duplication of real structures and the imaginary ones as the same process, is not a deep enough idea- This implies that inside a nucleus, at some level of complexity,there can be smaller nucleus, the noirion, like a centromere in cell division but not necessary on the usual levels. Just as in a particle we can imagine this center- not necessarily dark, nor of some direction in space or time, as a complicated singularity with structure (such as the Kea theorem 24ness) the quasic era considered in totality as if a center as if a disembodied or distant big bang or inflation theory concept. Or in the general scheme of things with this view, Rio Frio with some such creative object, even if virtual in the "apparently hollow" center of the earth- that is a black hole that does seem to relate to the gravity and entropy and things like the background that adjusts the light speed.

*3 Landscape of the New Physics: The most general unified cosmology- the OMNIUM as background is a landscape much wider than that of the string and brane concepts- for it is conceived as a sea of branes that is contained in one brane. The landscape is so general that we cannot but diffusely define what a center is, what local is, what remote is... what the nature of information as to the styles of neutrinos is.

We imagine in the omnium as if an explorer of the landscape, a science fiction sort of idea I had thought about much earlier, some rules of the dynamics of it all- much like the bra ket notation with maybe ^ and V as well as |x> and so on- if at some point we can distinguish (on our journey) what is the up and down of the totality of a brane. For one thing the sea and the land in our maps at some shore may be interchanged. The direction up or down in space may be interchanged. The generational depth grid counts up and down and the ordering in time (which itself can be directionally interchanged) can reach some shore or singularity where our traveliers can so travel in new generational directions.

Let us forget for the moment what mechanisms makes the decisions to travel possible for the travelers. At any given moment they are caught as with ourselves while we exist in a slice of time or space, or even a slice in a sense of a brane. Let us also forget any history- as these sorts of theories with depth of hidden symmetries are debatable- as the grounding for the subconscious in psychodynamics- for it is clear that history and economics may obey such a trend as well evolution with it hidden genetics. Do we have super-singularities or not? Are these Machian in a sense if they are (as if a vacuum filled, or say a psyche or soul filled with a unique history) in the higher (exxene) relativity- above the gravity ideas that seems to relate overtly? For the coherence (resistance to mutation and definition of its individuality) in the Machian sense may be the properties of Norion super or dark continuum nuclei within. If so a wider world here for our view of genetics and for our medicines, healing, than we now have even if that is more than we at first imagined but a few years ago.

In the landscape, as if coming on a land mine, a supernucleus may explode into several lower level singularities, new matter, gamma bursts, an so on- all perhaps with the view to have everlasting or at least a sense of conservation laws.

I have tended to see my quasic grids at the cross centers as the statement of the generational state or level- (I lay issues aside of the grid itself in this more relaxed view of the landscape). It is clear however, to me last night, that we can with the rules seeming to underlying the overt world such as triality and order, color code the motions between such pixels of the grid and these do not need to be considered rigidly linear. On this we should be able to represent the Feynman diagrams in their generalization or reduction to their various possible particle scenarios... the Color here not one of order, nor as a dimension a dimension added in the generalization of length sense but of more information, to some extent is represents the direction of the quasic plane (turning the Feynman diagram at right angles to read the diagrams). Of course the drawing of such colored lines, curves points etc on the one multibrane can have its permutations and disembodied ordering all of which should be considered.

The landscape here I envision is of course wider than that of the mere string like theories. If as a background it would make for some interesting science fiction of a slightly new variety and generalization if it peopled with characters- simplified to treating the outer space as if we could travel on it by ship and so on--- one thing for sure, in our existing cosmological models there is great confusion as to what is some subdivision or not of the whole and what is multiple or parallel in our ideas of time and space- so we may as well base it on a metaphysics as some have seen fit to do with questionable assumptions grounding things like inflation theory by itself.

Triality (n-ality) is also a quasic and generational concept as dynamics as well it is the general case of what in some places in the landscape such as origins we regard as some sort of absolute as the colors of rest and motion mix, rest, and move.

* * * * *

Future Dark (Noir) Matter Effects and Technologies

2012-01-30T15:41:00.008-06:00

Future Dark (Noir) Matter Effects and Technologies L. Edgar Otto Jan, 29, 2012 by The Pe Sla I could add another effect but that would be a discussion on the software, a simulation, rather than the hardware of the truth of a physical experiment when true. But as with the evidence that may come from such predictions it is not clear where, finally, the software and the hardware is distinguished or begins.

I believe this is about all that can be said for awhile so I will return to other projects but be near on line if anyone needs clarification. Good Luck, Good Creativity, and Good Enquiring, one and all! Our bright futures may have something more than hopeful substance after all... :-)

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Learning Machine XVI Braids of Time L. Edgar Otto Jan.31, 2012

I cannot quote yet from the few living masters, their manuscript closer to
be ready for publication, the three who would meet for dialog, long workers
Above the trend now explained as science, above economy and epistemology
the ancient quest, some of faith only in their world view, all the civil rights love fest.

For the issue is time and causation, the uniqueness of history, the right and the left
each to claim that A is A or A is not A, no simple unities or dialectics, the world
Itself the experiment as to what is awakening and what converges to scarcity.

Again that the pink unicorns not existing makes the old gray mare all the more real.

Have you felt less real these last few days because your friend became news
waiting until the spring thaw, past his expiration date to rise from the river?
Is the reality of his crash into the zero speed limit roadsigns made your life less real?
How is it you assume his was a rational departure, no accident or stumble and
without some cause, not the surprise of those re-awaking recalling the pain so leap?

The fuzzy world has a place where the ghosts wait for some spring thaw likewise.
not far from the place where in searches sometimes nothing is ever found.
Memories, buried so they cannot haunt and we can be sure in closure, time itself
history assumed real or phantom in the hidden trees of depths that moves times

Ties it up into braids like shepherd moons in the rings of Saturn, and in the cosmic
scheme of perfection the paths meet of dust, the Jupiter's to deflect and eat the comets
At the final cloudy moment where things gather that do gather, the giant Red Spot
and the Hexagon at the poles, equators moving slower than they, in layers.

In this world, stuck on some shadows, his body seen through binoculars trapped on
the shallows, his face not seen, and never known he wore camouflage, soaked, bloated
We note he is missing his left hand and the right arm frozen into position.

For some souls, what was solid in their lives in the face of great news, as if the reality of
the battle ground sits in to the young there in circumstance warriors, what was their
Solid life and purpose, already lost in dream, seems more real- or that myth that the
ones down to earth not dreamers imagines the swimmer taking its reality with him.

Worry not which is now the ghost, or what the grounding of the world that you think must
have its answer... Even in these days wider the invisibility as we at one with our consciousness
As to the unique history of our life stream and its vanishings we are all the necromancer.

* * * * *

The Symmetry of Behavior and Purpose

2012-01-30T15:05:00.005-06:00

The Symmetry of Behavior and Purpose The Pe Sla L. Edgar Otto Jan. 29, 2012 written day after the last grand finalie post on the possibilities of these ideas for future technology (which of course risk those who are on similar paths by the exactness of experiments- I thought of this in relation to other dark matter theorists where we could, if falsified, rise or fall with our fortunes together. I am glad I do not find a link today on Kea's blog - not that she owes any explanation but I mention this due to the nature of possible censorship and obsessive interest in her blog, evidently. But for me it means I am more free to not adjust my titles to read more formally scientific and generally understandable. Again, in our human nature, the inspiration being Pinker for this last post out of the chronology of the writing is this general and foundational question and as such could be just considered philosophy. In any case I do not speak for anyone about their theories- still, I as a poet may refer from time to time to Kea's Theorem. I quite imagine that now I can devote some time to the lyrics and music projects, what time is left.

This morning in the observation of my oil drop floating in water and alcohol simple experiment I concluded that where the smaller ones are adsorbed is the the condensing of these as if singularities on the ring and at the large spheres equator where such singularities merge. Of course this is but one observation. Still it may have influenced me to think about the next (previous written) post on possible new technologies.

Pinker in a sense in this book on human nature is an alternative view to the work in the 70's of Dawkins et al in which I took part in the debate- for it also involved the "instruction" rather than Dawkins term "meme" by F. T. Cloak Jr. whom is mentioned in the text of the "Selfish Gene" and in my less educated attempts wrote extensively about in my large book "Instruction and Being" if the manuscript still exists. The Dawkins view is of course a more materialist one- in fact Dawkins makes the leap to see religion as a bad and superstitious influence on humanity. Yet, his observation of how rapidly things can evolve mechanically from chaos, as if the response of ants to stimuli, is high science.

Pinker has a new book out by the way and if it is anything like his previous ones it will be worth reading, a popular view that has substance in many areas with very extensive research of the documentation of concepts presented.

I include in the lead photo a page from that book where he cites Newt Gingrich in this time that Gingrich is in the Florida primary for the republican nominations for president. Can this question of the (Human) Nature code make our political climate any more sensible? I mean, at what level of community or personal standards is there a zero point of sorts, conservative being the mainstream, the old balances between the individual and state, the outsiders and the tribe, man and woman, the compromise in this view of the blank slate or not as the issue of what is family? So it may not be just a politics as the nature of culture wars and ideology in the issue at least of altruism, for that is recently observed evolved in primates. The issue of altruism and sacrifice, and the brittle bonds of trust between friend and family, is more that we should qualify altruism as "meaningful sacrifice".

Opposed in the front running is the Mormon, Mitt Romney, this of course should have no bearing, once the appeal to votes in a democracy is achieved as to the leadership for all the people, for the office of president. Gingrich is repentant (although seen as an unpredictable individualist now Catholic.) The Mormon church, its distinct separation of the godhead, is more materialist in the hereafter than the protestants in general- Catholics acknowledge some mysteries as their model for heaven... but what I mean by this is the relevance of the nature-nurture issues and as Pinker points out, the hidden grounds and content of our genes is also the enduring stuff of great dramas of the scope of those possible and recognizable, universals from ancient Greece on the nature of Tragedy and so on among kin.

But such dialectics of opposing sides and interplay of symmetries, and foundational reason and physics, is much more in its fortunes than a one way or two way deal.

* * * * *

Gyroscopes and Quasic Energy

2012-01-29T15:18:00.014-06:00

Gyroscopes (Scoping the Gyres) and Quasic Energy L. Edgar Otto Jan. 29, 2012

The excesses certainly can be seen as evidence of super-symmetry, say of photons that expand from their condensed triality. Kea, among the theories of dark matter and like phenomena makes the leap to this of many possible explanations. From that hint and leap I must apply it to my system and the wider concept of quasic energy. Forgive me the sense of awe (but not fear as science can ameliorate that in us) and elevated, poetic mood as is perhaps our state if we think about cosmology. You can tell from the range of complexity of my writings above, and if one day they can be easily accessed by computer methods of analyzing script and photos, that the scope of the vision is a wide panorama itself a sort of scale invariance.

The Footnote:

The fluidity and fluency I found in number and space structures I also find and acknowledge for words. Poetic moods and sensitivity to the extent of our creativity and experience allows -including error- sporadically arising and correcting somewhere in awakenings facts as if anew in time.

In this sense we all learn new languages or are influenced by their styles and use by others if learning becomes yet originates as our own. This seems true despite whatever content of deeper meanings or parallels of connections in the span if we race to the skies or rest in contemplation at our own center of existing, and whatever the case we find of reality in the highest or lowest remote scales- that words may have, isolated and lonely in our sand box or falls, know our hope filled fellowship has togetherness, Love.

In the quest for understanding many have made an essential leap (and ultimately for whatever reason the gods are silence and they bravely explore left to their own) taken a small step that adds to the body of literature, library, and raises the bar of human cognition.

Most of them known only among the pantheon of theorists, some little known who took the step, did the work to its critical mass dawning, bare the burdens, first almost in disbelief felt and the joys of discovery. These were not household names, but even fame can have its intrusions and expectations on the authors. Lonesome is the vision and deeper concerns far from the popularity of others, the circles of peers and the crowd. Those with still unanswered concerns at the frontier of contemplations
which no one can judge such artists or advise him in such work.

I have been a fool like any man, social status collapsing, so to meet the damsel in distress, her tears a weapon. In fame it is often the power (ignorance as an evil) that is protected at the cost of truth so war is waged on other theories regardless of its fact or some hold that there is no such truth ultimate or possible at hand.

We do not need in our explorations to commit to some view, save existentially. We receive the eternal signal of wisdom as if the work of world building must take its time. Only in retrospect can we make a sound, and artistically accentuated story that stands out from the events and meanings of our journey that it seems or is the most important, and highly unique thus creative, thing. Even if a fluency in what the world and gods debate as to a language of lies and blasphemy.

So I cannot make the leap, commit to some destiny as some physicists think they can do, nor hold there is the immanent Deity we can imagine (the one God in his silence too, loading the dice and apparently leaving the game at least for awhile without explanation.) Nor can I fall into a sterile nothingness as the vision in answers. I was always free not to, not cup, to ground the reality of God but that has been a remote echo of wonder in the back of my mind but far even from natural living in the night with colour and light in my dreams. Evil souls- and how we characterize them in a universe without characterization - cannot discern the glory or the insanity of visions and even live as if they know they do not know but hide it if hiding from the work of knowledge and wisdom they relish the freedom to do wrong unto others.

But if among you gods of theory, you cannot see, after the long and careful climb the heights as if into the depths the likes of Pagels did and quantum physicists drawn to mountains tend to do, perhaps to fall, reaching, reach the bottomless lakes where theories dissolve along with reason... Kea's take on the grounding of the dark continuum as the correct step that you cannot distinguish its wider significance, then you are no physicist, even in the physics of the new.

* * * * *

* * *

The fluidity

Of Stars and Butterflies, Numbers and Dimensions

2012-01-28T15:24:00.012-06:00

Of Stars and Butterflies Numbers and Dimensions L. Edgar Otto Jan. 28, 2012

I ended this posted series of papers with the quote on the nature of predictions, both from a scientific and more magical or subjective consideration which seems at the paradox of quantum theory as interpreted in relation to materialism and super-symmetry ideas ( this is also a confusion of directions in space as well as time- in the age where a child sees the world outside his family as the Noir, maybe that reflected in people taking cues and fashion from the movies- in the cold war- did not the Marxist idealize the material? Or perhaps Lenin wisely quantized the party into soviets and also acknowledge the party as defined by electrification. In any event if some had studied Engels then the dialectical ideas of electromechanics and the technology would have been advanced by fifty years.) So is it the left or right on which the God that failed was such a social experiment, more mystical than scientific? Am I to believe the news that the right wing who so vote are less educated and generally more stupid or is it that our universities remain still the last bastion of Marxism on the left?

Anyway, Lubos has an interesting post beginning with a statement on predictions and apparently in reaction against who he perceives to be anti-quantum theory: I quote some random parts of it:

"However, at the same moment, the new and more accurate theory often leads to predictions that are pretty much indistinguishable from the predictions of the old theory, at least when we only talk about a class of limiting situations that may be "special" from a theorist's viewpoint but that can still be de facto covering all of our life i.e. that can be "universal" from a practical person's viewpoint."

"When I look at the actual abilities of quantum physics to confirm various beliefs held by the superstitious and supernatural people, I don't find too many. What quantum mechanics is actually able to do is to overcome various results of classical reasoning such as Bell's inequalities or the predicted results for spins in the GHZM experiment, Hardy's paradox, and other quantum games. However, the "truly spiritual and superstitious people" wouldn't be able to calculate the predictions in these situations even classically so I don't think that quantum mechanics should be able to legitimately move physics closer to their hearts."

Thank you Lubos, but I am not sure the question of if science has abandoned materialism makes sense or is a conflict in itself in possible systems beyond the quantum formulations.

Also, and I have not been keeping up with him enough, this fellow blogger I follow had some interesting posts lately like this one. He keeps up with the science news and speculations and the link here he offers is worth the reading for its view on dimensionality.

I posted this on facebook status today:
L. Edgar Otto
A problem with communications around the world on the internet is that it does little to help one keep track of the date or day, for there can be confusions where someone else thinks its a different date. That and time being a rather fluid thing and sometimes depending on what we are doing or how naps may change things, we may in a sense lose or gain days or find them in sync. This is a human condition like associating names to different places where you know people in some role. It is freedom in the now and distinguishing the real- not necessarily a case of the absent minded scientist lost in his creativity or going down I-94 deep into the texting on the cell phone.

* * * *
I had a thought of which I may have not written down somewhere clearly- that of the role of Dihedrons as general objects with not necessarily a zero volume but more like a time volume (one in any case of the expansion and contractions) of which from the quasic view I could imaging these abstract roles as the TGD mouths of wormholes?

I have come to realize also the very questionable idea of a half singularity (where I write it as half infinity) seems more solid as if a mirror along the diagonal plane and this may be the case in ordinary matrix theory- we are at that half infinity in each moment and perhaps in the return of moments... in the count of the abstract pixels, half the diagonal it seems at least from the intuitive geometrical view (after all duality is not all and everything as in Rowlands quantum world- one that by the way convincingly shows how relativistic views and renormalization are not needed as adjustments in some nilpotent cases so in a sense the classical and relativistic distinction is not that radical a truth or description of reality. So here we ask, as with our suggestive hypnosis of the need to seek for certain formulations of super-symmetries if they can be seen, as if not seen already, or in a sense seen materiality and in a reductionist view the goal, we certainly should begin starting with triality and beyond or integrate such concepts into the whole before the past or future before us or future or past after us bounces into that flat plane of half singularity and finds its directions. On that diagonal as in the tricube (really of six bi colors merged to gray of the 30 cube two tone sets) we in a sense add the idea of 8 of 16 reflected back to origins (I call this the Fayray, that is for those who would say "no way fay", ahh the beauty here and the the beasts!) thus we demonstrate, in the reduction as if to found some theory of holography of information phenomena and surface mixings the intelligible conditions of both the counting and the shapes or forms of things as we learn to recognize such concepts of patterns.

* * * * * The cover photo of this post is the city in the distance including a steeple and hospital seen through the branches in winter, also part of the next door brick wall. I take this as a metaphor of these unified aspects of philosophy we might emphasize as spiritualism or materialism as the issue. I meant to type out and of course revise a little the two themes- one inspirational one technical of the visualization view of how nature sees her dimensions. But I am short of time- I may do it later.

Reality Check with QED Nilpotent Methods

2012-01-27T20:41:00.004-06:00

Reality Check with QED Nilpotent Methods L. Edgar Otto January 27, 2012 please adjust the date on the illustrations. What if Rowlands physics is all there is? The idea of the standard theory as the Higgs could be forever out of reach of our conceptions and experiments. As Einstein said, we should make a theory simpler but only so far - I imagine by this, the strength of an axiom only, that our idea of God is such a great synthetic achievement. Are foundations deeper than the powerful nilpotent method indefinite synthetic stories? I note that Eliot is quoted in the blogs, as he often is, on our journey that comes home again to see were we started in new light... our sense perhaps from a physical closure, a given fact we may feel in our being in this universe.

Tonight, I come back after some raw and casual thoughts and playing with numbers. I find things there, and coming back to myself and seeing my methods in a new light, I thought it would be worth the raw posting. For one thing, in my fairly recent understanding of quantum theory beyond what one may find in the magazines or in the popular radios or casual talks with undergrad students makes me think that in one sense my quasic ideas can be reduced and explained by Rowlands nilpotent methods. A good theory presentation considers what are the objections as well the implications or predictions.

Even the Fundamental Theory of the great Sir Arthur Eddington seems it can be seen in this reduction- the idea essentially of reducing things to 5 (gamma matrices) from the 8 elements of the complex algebra- thus symmetry breaking. For he derives the fine structure constant of 136 or so from the number in the diagonal and the half of the rest in a 16 by 16 triangle. After all, atoms outside the nucleus at least and with analogs of QED there, would say 136 electrons or elements are possible. Of course my long time blush on it revolves around 120. Eddington would count the electrons (or protons) as an average of those possible and he uses 2^136 in the very large but exact calculation. Why not if there is all there is?

I did spend some considerable time when I first was given the Soma game making variations and trying to make he puzzle easy from one unified formula. In the small pamplet that came with it the inventor, Piet Hein, was said to have jotted down the idea while attending a quantum mechanics lecture. Who knows but the puzzle itself in its own way begin teaching me deeper quantum ideas as a part of it as structure in an intelligible reality. Of course my independent development and methods had gone on for decades before this- keep the character of their methods.

Now, spiral ideas would certainly have their place as one of the wonders of this only given reality of this world... and to some extent these contain magic for some or can be a key to say galaxy evolution. In any case have we yet explained the simple magic numbers of the electron shells and sub-shells, (and the nuclear analogs)? There would be 8 such shells in my 120 system which is the Z number- and now to consider duplications especially on the sub-shells where spinning electrons can flip and determine the magnetic properties of atoms.

This of course is an 8 dimensional case where 240 is the number of spheres that can close pack around a central 8D sphere. Thus there is a sort of maximum symmetry which I have called with binary methods a "quason". It is simple compared to what takes many hours and many people to compute the complexity and depth of the Monster group. Is that symmetry all there is?

In texts on Abstract Algebra I have occasionally come across statements that we should not underestimate the counting of things in such theories in which sometimes there are remarks like "If the symmetry of this table does not send shivers up your spine you do not understand the theorem." To this I would add the value of labeling or naming things, labeling so that what cannot be measured by an accessible number can be if the same sort of objects can be distinguished. But is this method any more than a different way to apply the group theory to the limit or frontier of our mathematical properties. How could it be this easy if it has taken so long and we still do not have a unified physics, only a sort of labeling of descriptive names for concepts all suspect by someone or other- and not always excluding each others view? What a law and a formula is in the first place has this element of labeling.

I begin to have shivers up my spine in the seeing of numbers- of course the digits have properties we may do well to reduce a bit to our usual formulas, conciseness in our number systems that may at least tell us something analytically. The how if not the why. The way I use the decimal numbers seem to become to me less and less trivial and they have interesting symmetrical and geometrical properties for 11 x 11 is 2 x 2 and either way that can equal four and this continues along with the way we may read and relate to the binomial expansion, for example. Pascal's triangle analogs everywhere. It is not like probing something in the dark as much as feeling my way in a soft world where it is a problem not to find something to stumble on and as limitless as that world is errors, with the right view of the logic, can be corrected or set up to work.

Just saying so... It never hurts to be intellectual enough and honestly scientifically objective enough to consider the ideas and those of others in our reality checks. Of course risking the board as well as the game can be the human condition. But it seems that somehow in our ever more complicated journies into the great symmetries of four space and beyond the whole comes back again but with deeper meaning- for Rowlands the mystery of the triality dimension. In new light, of course. But my intuitions would not be useful or of interest if I could not come back creatively and see my role, my work, and myself in new light- but I still think for now it surely is not the same place again in time or space. But this is the usual debate as well all take of on this journey, not lost really but not needing a ride for we are already there.

* * *

QCD Triality and New Consequences for Topology

2012-01-27T12:19:00.017-06:00

QCD Triality and New Consequences for Topology L. Edgar Otto Jan. 28, 2012

One consequence of the depth of view some of the alternative physics bloggers have put forth is a whole new understanding and summary of physical and epistemological processes. Many ideas relating to the dark matter-continuum ideas seem to converge in our general directions of research and thinking.

I post my informal counting and errors, usually involving signs which on the level of Peter Rowlands "nilpotent" formulism generalizes the world into all scalars and all positive. But these forms are not needed save for specific areas of application, as I posted, Triality (and beyond) is a general property of numbers that on several levels result in the same sort of structures reduced (here by the threes- the logic a mixing as with Pierce's "threeness" in the permutations of his syllogisms. Numbers, and the generalization of numbers as vectors, ultimately do not depend on the signs including imaginary concerns, twists and turns- yet this is a big part of it of which if we are to unify existing physics on the topological and arithmetical level we should do so giving these view equal weight.

Now I could have developed this in terms of number theory and it may already be but not interpreted as such- that is 2n and 2n + 1 restricted to the odd and eveness of properties and dimensions. So the reading of such algebra, even when developed, should not be reduced as to obscure the utility of composite directions (beginning with the ancient term called gender wherein 2 and 3 as six begin things. Moreover, this related to the p-adic concepts, to be relaxed likewise. It relates to combinotorics in the sense of what order powers to powers may be taken in the duality of things in the permutations, that reflected in geometric representations such as braids and such- but we can go beyond the idea of simple duality and the formula admitting division as a partial property of time and space for the perfection of Mersenne type calculations. It is the concept of operations, where for example we may not distinguish something as simple as multiplication and addition and the logical properties that can be paradoxically raised in abstract structures and motions- especially triplication or four fold systems involving a shadowy abstract concept of inertia as motion or rest (mass for a photon for example as such a concept of rest where it applies in some field.)

At unity, a quasic pixel, here the series of numbers (ending in 6 as it relates across the quasic plane directions of gender, and new ideas of generations generalized and most every other concept such as a triad of Leech lattices ...)we find at the origin of a system a natural inversion or mirror that must go beyond the pattern as a fraction- such as 1/2 and usually in a triality field even the sub reductions of such superimposed thus invisible numbers do intelligibly add up to give us the essential group values of things like inversions and rigid rotations.

By these reductions of space- and may we ask if some sort of physicality are to be the mediators say of energy or connection to a field, gauge (the abstraction of some matrices that imply such analogous structures as in Kea's first paper cited on this blog on neutrinos and quarks turns out to be a three way deal- as in Weyl, and more)
One might properly ask not what gives mass but also what is the mediator of symmetry and its operational structure in the vacua of the universe- we see then that as Rowlands pointed out for the first few group numbers and their subgroups- with the idea that groups up to E8 are the ones of interest to physics- and that part of the picture is one of simple three space and particles that do not need an outside renormalization in the mathematics or physicality, the idea of Higgs is at the frontier of higher systems itself, the number of Higgs comes up, the value of its mass as a particle- yet from the view of reduced triality this is a "hopeful monster" itself as our experimental data seems to tease us in the finding out. The same can be said for some rather surprising phenomena of the tauons and top quarks- I am sure the competent physicists out there can relate this intelligible to what is meant by the main diagonals and the information encoded therein, in a unified system much as a reduced idea of pure holography and fractal chaos.

I know that in a sort of depth, inverted into the not so simple idea of the nucleus, the "little planet" like concept, with the simplification and confusion of binary powers in the quasic field thus the inverse square laws, or 4th power laws, may have restraints somehow just as we imagine them in the greater span of the macrocosm. That is to say, just how far can we go into this depth of dark or shadow continua? My 15 color cubes of six values may have some sort of particle meaning if we do imagine them as mediators inside the nucleus- but these cannot be simply gluons that exclude the same color and are not privileged in the global triality of such space.

I find of of interest that the (by simple counting and an openness to and invisibility of absolute numbers or signs in trivial binary powers where numbers are the innate confusion that cannot be programmed in our calculators) that such numbers end in 6, or 80 and that these grow rapidly down the quasic diagonal. It is a matter of adding 5 or 80 or 1280 and so on to successive quasic state unity cells in the patterns of five (by shift from zero this means of course 5 + 1, but do we not always forget to count ourselves in a group or start the calendar at zero? Again, how far can this process go and what new forms of higher matter is possible and why if they are, and not say hidden in quasars, dimensionally, are they not here and now?

* * * * *

Well, it seems an hour after posting this Fermilab takes up Kea's and My themes for the day... and of this post I am in very much close agreement with the spirit of its philosophy to the extent is looks at physics if not the new physics.

Here Fermilab

* * * * *

Oh, I put this comment on Kea's post when I first came on... (of course I post it here as reference as I never expect anyone to approve of my comments if only that they may be off topic in some sense. But it is beautiful that someone offered an intelligent theory and explicitly stated it- even when long off on such mountains of research all on their own...

Kea, I am impressed. As Mahndisa S. Rigmaiden said in your link MOND :

"The more people don't explore new ideas, the more you can play with them;)"

But I do not regard these ideas as unorthodox but the new physics mainstream, and your paper a critical insight (of course your explorations will surely evolve more).

You and some of the other bloggers have deep and fundamental connections here in this age of awakening.

I am glad I do not play alone in the sandbox... whatever the nature of sand. New and informal speculations posted mentions your insights, synchronously it seems.

The Pe Sla (who is wondering if the crack sand for natural gas recovery will have its cost on the health and environment... here from he Sandhills of Wisconsin.)

* * * * *

Complicated Thoughts from Simple Observations

2012-01-26T13:53:00.011-06:00

Complicated Thoughts from Simple Observations L. Edgar Otto Jan. 26, 2012

Still here in the coffee shop, a little early to go home, a day off perhaps, save money, no new projects, seems I've gained a day. My informal thoughts move toward a lighter vein- watching how my oil drop in water and alcohol evolves- and what a simple experiment right up there with things like we do not know why (that may have changed) the foam on the top of a stirred cup of tea appears like a galaxy with arms is not explained. Such simple questions we sometimes wonder about are occasionally researched and some of the answers are useful in other areas, for example why ones footprint in the wet sand at the beach seems to make a dry imprint.

So, my artist roommate is on a role with styles and all. He too with a fit of creativity, that sweet universe where our joint projects are justify my being stuck there. He is studying Miro again and tells me of some of his autobiography but as far as I can tell Miro and other influences are not directing his change of styles. I then fancy that Miro, the artist, is not a bad model for the workings of our minds.

The access to easily recover memories in its state of quasi-finite differences in energy and the question of build up and the dissipation of heat in physical processes. What then is unique and real in our memories that can vanish awhile does so into a vacuum outside the immediate physical, say of chemicals and fields, but existence as at least applied metaphysics as a principle and the endurance of patterns and how the patterns stereonomically fit together as structures in the void goes further into vacua than the idea of a non-empty vibrating virtual field. But that we can have such a vanishing of unique memories where such nothingness is absolute as a vacuum is still an open question as to preserving memory and structures if we consider the totality of a universe so to explain it by the absurdity or paradox it based on emptiness. This higher level of the null or nothingness in a sense makes the physics with such shadow concepts seem much more real for the universe seems given and where it not where do the shadows go?

Miro, for my roommate at least, seems to be an art self-therapy of sorts in that it organizes his moods and what some may see as a disassociation of style and mind. This of course is akin to the state between dream and awakenings or one could say the primitive emotion of desire as if our hallucination capacity. Sponozas rather Euclidean attempt as classifying emotions is just that in the light of what we now know as deeper concepts and topologies involving particles and planes.

So, the models of oil drops, rather low tech but that seems a matter of degree. I quite imagine Einstein thinking about gravity and such by thought experiments with the simple idea of Brownian motion in a jar of water and how it has, well, Fermi like levels in relation to the vertical of gravity. Or from what complicated observation, especially there at the dawn of the electrification age, from what did he draw on to see more than the familiar and accepted views of space and time? If not the mathematics developed after the vision then what?

So it is that in a plane, for some mysterious reason as I watched the bacteria at ever higher resolutions with my toy microscope (eventually the height of it was six feet and I had to stand on a chair to use it) become ever more moved by the vibrations on them- somewhat annoying really as I tried to find them and focus. But in a plane with such randomness- after all motion itself does not seem to imply that something was alive there as much as the living things reacting to it, in a plane such random motion, at the square root of the time, eventually comes back to the same place (not so in general natural space). So the ring around my sphere of oil by nature, even not stirred, will cause the smaller spheres to eventually meet and combine. But this does not seem to happen uniformly across the ring. It is rather like a few parts of a ring expanding or contracting as in the physics of the ink drop experiment when it is stirred. Obviously stirring things the other way will not bring back things to a previous order nor completely make them random beyond a certain point of disorder. Yet, in this simple system just like a pendulum or ball set spinning on a string, overall the system loses its motion and reaches a state of rest much like our idea of zero point energies in a system indefinitely open or closed.

I may also wonder if things do apply to layers in the two substance mixing, for from the z axis there are two directions that push on the disk to keep it in place if we can not imagine variations on the square root of time as variations in time- is this not a simple metaphor for time in a gravitational field or can lead to such a more complicated thought? Of course we can put this into just a metaphor of gravity and there is a bottom to any such dynamical process as if what is involved here is a relative asymmetry. Such an idea would not lead conceptually to an idea of dark matter effects as a deeper vacuum or for that matter in the depths of the nucleus of an atom what sort of more general description there can be other than the more complicated application of say the analogs to quantum theory in the vibrations of the vacuum (which by the way we do have some models to explain this phenomenon intrinsically).

But back to Miro, for in a sense his method of approaching art is to take things to the artistic minimums much like the Feynman diagrams when he has made a tracing of various things in his environs- but we know that this process depended on the amount of food he was able to obtain as to its shorthand for the perception of the surreal if one does not abandon the models to only and absolute random cloud physics. I know the influence of food can relate to the access of memory by some very obscure knowledge forgotten or recalled (such that the number of strings on the Irish harp over time on the English royal standard.) From one view it seems that potentially in the vacuum beyond access or not that memory could hold any amount of our experience. It does not seem likely that in such a small space as the brain that we can contain this much potential and accessible information- not even as multi-dimensional, certainly the number of the trillions of nerve connections and networks are not enough, nor the evolved ability to encounter all dangers to the integrity of a systems immunity responses needed, nor just the complexity on a molecular level.
In any case where in the depths do our unique memories and personality go and return after we have experiences deep comas or anesthesia in general?

In this land between sleep and awakenings, desire can go both ways into the rise or fall into joy or sorrow (Spinoza again) the uppers and downers. This is needed that the perceptions do not saturate so as not to be able to see clearly and discern movement and shapes. But is this need for sentient systems foundational? Is there something more fundamental at work here?

Consider the oil drop experiment for the measuring of the charge of a single electron, it seems that in looking back at the data the experiment was fudged or influenced by the bias of the experimenter. Yet, the vague hidden desire as a sort of quasi-certainty was useful if not essential for the progress of the model. This may be the case in general where we try to simplify, understand, and organize our ideas no matter how complex our experimental apparatus and ways to interpret them.
But it may be nothing more than a world a little between how we debate as the more fundamental of physics from the Fermion or Boson approach- that there can be a few confused levels even in the most accurate of experiments hidden in the topology of the vacua. In any case we do dream at the frontier of such worlds and dreams do not always re-normalize to make clear sense or betray clear meanings. Even in early psycho-dynamics at the birth of this field we have the usual debate.

At what point finally do two smaller sphere at a bulge of a partial arm of the ring around some larger center, one that does not always command a true center but may react to its other drops in the ring, do they merge if not by a more general idea of things like the Casmir force and other analogs to models, perhaps this force as fundamental after all and not a secondary phenomenon, attractive and repulsive too, is the mechanism of where and when they merge or for that matter where and when a photon leaves an electron on some both up and down shell in an atom?

In this world where we debate the nature of what is the fundamental physics, the ideas of fields and so on... of a zero point vibration level, we may not find the next generalization (and we are indeed fortunate to have the great debates for unification of the quantum and relativistic realms at the same time in history so as to desire their unification as the grounding for our wider world view) by mere appeals to things like chirality so contained in the nilpotent view as the mechanism for organization and creation of physical states. I once thought this so for a principle that would explain the evolving structure of galaxies. Not that such ideas are not needed on the levels they apply, just not quite foundational enough.

But for most of us, it seems we do not desire to seek deeper explanations where it seems that none are needed- anyway, what sort of experiments can there be set up that would record a more general vacuum interactions directly save perhaps by the remarkable sensitivity and powers of self-delusion as an instrument of receptivity and decision of the human brain and mind in all its complexity?

Sometimes, the best part of a poem or the music falls in the silences. I fancy myself a poet more general than the confusion of spelling but as fundamental as it should have been I realize I have not had the deep sensitivity to sounds and words that these entities seem to have. Caution is not always good for exploration of our worlds of thought and matter. But if any of us, even the yet to be firmed up views of the very young who seem to potentially be capable of mastering at least one human language among all of them, think they cannot be fluent complexly in the depth and reservation that things be simple a unity and given, that we do cannot on some level comprehend or directly experience the science and philosophy unto comprehensions- you have either not found the challenges of it even in the schools, or have been led astray and told wrong.

* * * * *

Kea has a most excellent paper posted today :-)

* * * *

That link was certainly worth staying around in the coffee shop today :-) a couple of thoughts last night - I vaguely recall 27 involved in the crossings of lines by some mathematician. I also thought about the 2^3 ratio as natural to dark matter like values observed (and perhaps cancelled in the mirco and macro world Casmir like extentions of ratios of the dimensionless...) That is to say the foundations in the recursion of the 5's and 8.

Also in playing with these whole numbers counting the quasic null cells I have the impression that 96 involved in say the 24-cell polytope structure itself should be a triplication much as if we involve that number naturally in the spins and inversions of the hypercube. The counting of these hidden threes is rather subtle. But is not the idea of some deeper structures of vacua and things like the dark continuum? I don't know, maybe it is a small intuition that will resolve later. Certainly the effects may be there without the assumption the color thing or the bioctonian thing or its real duplication equivalents necessarily having a hidden fractal structural pattern in quarks. But this fuzzy world of so many layers, the five Coxeter honeycomb like that makes our comprehension of experimental data quasi-uncertain and ultimately independent of ideas of general rotation as the last of geometrical operations equal with translations to reflections...perhaps a somewhat integral or difference in the measure of spin values, say the thirds etc... involving pi and its hidden values there but not directly observed as in Kea's and Louise's intuitions.

Nevertheless, the reality of the grid that marks of a quasic grid (epsilon-delta theory in my past posts) there is an analog as if in the higher gravity it is a higher gravity or mass idea the inertia laws of Newton not quite as simple as a smooth change from rest to motion, but rather classically as quantization. But is not this the case of the contiguity and laws involved anyway?

Still, and issues of general time reversal and its roles are still open in the quasi-filled vacua, the nature of ultimate and exact and standard fitting ratios of the dark continuum models may resolve somehow- perhaps an ultimate symmetry building. When of course we go even into higher abstractions than some of our more sensible and intelligible models or the defense of some others have so far cautiously imagined.

But in general should we regard a gluon as a sort of bounded photon of light? Maybe it flees away from some idea of such a mass that it contains- I mean, we should certainly expect that if such things were free, as with general nature these things in a sense at least virtually be, then on all scales could these not be just a photon say of a vast gamma ray emission level... complicated I know- but I have yet to incorporate and explore these thoughts on our doubly explosive new view of the vacuum and the continua.

Oh, Pitkanen has some interesting posts- I have been neglecting him but think he may need some time for new developments also. My earlier complaints at his links just stating titles of ideas is my fault I did not find the links from these in the design of the web page that contained more information.

* * * * *

Galaxy in a Teacup (Continued)...

2012-01-25T20:02:00.007-06:00

Galaxy in a Teacup (Continued)... 01-25-12

Let me start with a small video of my oil drop experiment- now the rings have become planets. I will add here my XIII, XIV, and XV poems of the series, most likely now complete, called The Learning Machine. I am not sure how good these are or what they communicate well or not- they are science related.

I apologize for anything that seems to offend anyone- but it is like for me at home in the balance of free verse and the occasional but not forbidden accidental rhyme- these sort of parallels in our mind that seem to reinforce some perception as does music- have to break out of the margins and make connections over new vistas of our sense and being in time. I am far from the alliteration at beginnings that come more natural to me- but aren't we all with our words and hope before the entropy? Still I miss the lost poems and heart for them of all my Spencerian sonnets of which although natural to English it is said that no sonnet can be perfect.

The Learning Machine (XII) L. Edgar Otto January 25, 2012

In Port LaCrosse over the Urantia sky
all that was not Little Earth was inside
Where the doomsayers, prophets, & fortune tellers
fell off into infinity as no two, their trails & worlds collide

We set up the heliport, hovering in hope, that the
star rovers slide up the the firepole sky falling alarms
Though thin the charm imbibing double visions from
the mustard seeds in the alchemist's retort
Some few who stumbled, their voodoo coyote street wise
to play hide & seek with prying eyes & bobbies and
Sadistic now-I-gotcha-you-SOB, how they enjoy their hobbies
as I escaped into a black hole full of gutter stink
Explored new worlds along the way beyond the source & sink
Cheeseheads in the sacrifice of Lambeau Field
Between jambone earth flatners & ice hockey sticks go 'round
the roller bladers & ballerinas toe picks for their toes
To vanish in their world all stalkers, sidewalk cracks &
itching nose I come back out smelling like a rose.

As David Rose sat on a tack & David rose, infrared his
skeleton under the "V's" of geese and herons taught
By artificial wings to find wetlands & home again
how mundane & real inverted roses ultra violet
Somewhere where the He-man cartoon is the real, not television
as kids there watch no violent Saturday morning TV show
Far from all auras & their plastic minds tremoring in the flickering
afterglow, begging their parents for action figures of the
Cup of coffee panhandlers & baristas in the coffee shop college cafe
between the ads for Bizzaro bobby socks, all drawn to fads &
Twinkie filled shot-from-guns grain Cheerios thrown 'way
they know its better in their world to eat the box...

* * *

The Learning Machine (XIII) L. Edgar Otto January 25, 2012

A solar flare of creativity clears the space junk from
the Clark Belt & while the music plays the
Electrons migrate back and forth between the poles
Van Allen's doughnut cloud electric as real as
Saturn's rings of dust & ice & his own flesh of satellites
then falls in glowing curtains, that, the best part
Of the play, no false dawns or the changing lengths of day.

It burns under water, in disasters points the way,
or in battle grounds where the One Eyed Jack is
King berings all ghosts & shadows to the light of day,
until the campfire joy of light, on its so brief, clinging
Falls in fireworks grand finality back to safety of the night
third time pays for all, third time sinking deep,
Third time pass the match delayed triangulations seek,

I do not know if in losing a day distracted by creativity
some absence of mind unnoticed as if while in lover creating time
Coming back aware of the gain & that my hours now match the clock
or if through the distance the star spit flesh above us
Beyond he bowl of sky coats my soul, another layer of coal forming
sediments or I just want it to make more sense in our four way
Juggling, a poem, fossils mislabeled, filed & sleeping, Darwin's, museums

The scientist in me cries superstition save in the last
digit, a zero, numbers multiplied by ten, that I hesitate
In the hotel of infinite rooms to label floors thirteen or
in false defiance become liquid through the cracks to let there.
Then again, I sometimes ask some spectre to move on & leave,
my roommate so sensitive, so taught in terms of Christian testing
Demons. His a fitful sleep - but it works though I do not tell him
he finds rest again...

* * *

The Learning Machine (XIV) L. Edgar Otto January 25, 2012

The greater part of violence is unseen as it even walks
among us in the world, invisible its efficient cause
It peeks & boos through the sweet but empty words of
those with freedom to make & break & change the laws
Or by firey madmen, cloaked in the robes of Hod
preparing redress, making wildfire holy, civilized &
Building armies, bring work in weapons, raise a soldier class
for some millenium for the first born, debts for weaving gold
On the mob in crystal breaking flurries, those stepping stones to be culled

The fertile ladies grow short & round, not tall & square
jaw hairy, their Adam's apple serves as well the Chapel,
Commands the stirrups & the scapulae while crack
Espri d'corps makes hives hum, worker bees to serve the Queen
As big breasted voluptuous save for those thin & tall
only skin & bones fashion deep, air brushed on the runway
Desire the diffuse fun of many drones to tease.

Who can want the canine roadkill bloating in the summer sun
all full of gas, Thanksgiving balloon tethered, paraded, no feet to bind
Who wants to be one pulling in their bellies unless its dark?
only in old movies do men bare their Buddha breasts,
Airbags of aging in cartoons the balloons as if to press a hundred pounds
weight lifters in pretense until some pin prick,

Who will abide with the wrinkled, wigged, breaking teeth, in incontinence,
infirm or professors living on their youthful laurels
Long in lifespan but far beyond their scars & errors
with tenure among the primates, theirs the superior sperm?

Yet still we dosado, regret the curse gone with Aunt Flo
as if the city smug and smog does not kill us - not knowing
Our own flesh, just passing time, just bait and jail bait minnows
with Rodin's Thinker made modular, too long to carve whole
Passing their prime till its too late, most students Dobie Gillis.

* * *

The Learning Machine (XV) L. Edgar Otto January 25, 2012

In this age of silicon heaven, startup ventures, upstarts
creating hard & soft jobs, booms and balloons in the aether
Layers upon layers & many windows & gates, clouds,
sauropods & isopods, super-cities or universes in one's hand
Prophets & explores, often work their lovers, Dante
dream of hope & levels reached, visit the sky scraper floors of hell as well.

In the clouds the data steam never sleeps in churning cream
the harp music pirated, its strings & scales doubling &
Somewhere, sold as is, fingers on the keyboard, on the screen
of passed by passers-by in coffee shops & in the streets, viruses.

No operating system, no tech support, nothing but a memory of
Piedmont Jr. High obsolete, turned into a community college
The lost persistent dream of Utopia comes too late for my schooling
in the mouth of the President, State of the Union, my childhood
Playing games with pocket knives and rockets, marbles on the playground
saber rattled & black listed long past burning draft cards
Another layer of warriors that can't come home & even they
replaced by robots, hacker nerds turned state spies command by video games

The old black & white TV, my eldest boy would not let me
take it to the dumpster when it burned out beyond repair thinking it alive
It already from Korea, none made here since our Zenith
too many wires for veined souls forbidden even in Arlington & landfills

Long before then, the age of business machines gone wild on steroids,
the promise like radio a tool for teaching becomes downloading oh du-wahs
She-boppa bubba lou far from the interest of tinkerers, wasteland whys,
nor how to, texting across the room, distrusting dialog, dial 911,
Stalking & stark naked, barroom lies, sober behind some myth of screens

I stumble down the wrong hallway, my clearance less than the room where I find
a large monitor, advanced dials, bells & whistles. I sit before it knowing
I should leave but cannot resist my need to know. My elbow by chance turns it on
I startled start to rise muttering the thought- then it speaks to me and I
Swear I'm caught, a person or radio inside - "No one is around & I will let you know if anyone comes near.
A game of four "D" chess perhaps?"

I say, the buttons look like English but it may as well be Greek or from the men from Mars."

It replies, "Press 6AU6 & start your clock, all these things I will teach you."

* * * *

* * * * *

Galaxy in a Tea Cup

2012-01-25T09:32:00.011-06:00

Galaxy in a Tea Cup L. Edgar Otto Jan. 25, 2012 (which other than the poem of this morning should be dated Jan. 24th - Oh, I see the problem I did not bring along this mornings poem number XII I shall place it here later. (after all I did take a rare afternoon nap so did not really confuse the date). This one concerns our bonds and their breaking through generations and what we imagine that can go far beyond the intentions and methods of our leaders... but XII is an amazing set of images with very focused references in time- I mean, if my work is worth it as unique and eventually decoded from the idiom- would I desire to transmit this- perhaps the awakening of a video played back in our minds speed read and later with cognizance recalled, transcending or perhaps the same thing, it played back third time going under water- please return here to catch it, it also takes from the science speculations on the foundations as the models such as the standard theory (to which it still is caught up in philosophy and metaphysics) or is there something to be said for creating our souls anew- the same unique persons without the sleep and cobwebs and streets of snow in our eyes?

These sci mag links and apod are highly relevant today:
Science Daily here and here:

The Learning Machine (XI) L. Edgar Otto Jan. 24, 2012

We're not each others burden taking pride in giving
not just the company of scoundrels or holy men
The one winged pigeon, messenger, extinct
flies in circles true with its phantom wing
Yet spirals down like helicopter maple seedlings

Or as eagles mating on the wing, his love too
with her phantom wing together thermals glide
She the mother bat, matrix in the belfry
can carry her cubs, nursing, weighing more
Than herself, all supermoms with super-partners

Only those with depth of mind, healing, universal
can conceive & understand, reflect on others
All the imaginary friends of self & of the same feathers,
that we connect & interfere with each others
Destiny & lives in heights and flight- it works both ways

Only those who do well to discern the scriptures
reading the pure poetry & who can write
Know the lover unto rebellion our life's work
overshadowed by long shadows of our former gods
Who did not require of you their homeless wandering
a model even when you heed my voice to heel
As if in the indifferent & dangerous world yourself you
cannot heal.

But you know already we heal also at a distance
wherein you do not escape our brittle bonds
No matter how far away in place or time you flee me
a broken barefoot ghost
Ring the bells as Christmas time, give up not your
letters I joyful that yours better I enjoy more than my own
As you learn, risk your freedom, soul, exploring new &
sometimes selfless lost souls, or dark & pointless lands...

* * *

The Learning Machine (XII) forthcoming...

* * *
My artist friend Steven Silverleaf posted after a long while on blogspot of which I now follow it here and commenting:

Those are very powerful images, Steven. They seem to convey a sense of motion and almost a mysterious cat like gait as if perhaps we do have such things as a sort of spirit guide, humans and the feline both walking, nay, flying upright.

Sometimes at the beginning of breakthroughs or the rediscovery of profound and fundamental art
the rawness and freshness sets the future and are more precious than the very refined end of a theme- the majority of us caught searching in the dark with the artist seeking his unique visions.

The PeSla

* * * * *

A Second Gravity and Unicorn Mass

2012-01-24T10:09:00.011-06:00

A Second Gravity and Unicorn Mass L. Edgar Otto January 23, 2012

"That Pink Unicorns do not exist makes the Old Grey Mare all the more real..." from an old dusty book on logic.

The Learning Machine (X) L. Edgar Otto Jan. 23, 2012

A page & the fall of words down it, square & blank
whatever the substance of colour or invisible the ink
The story foreseen at some life's beginning, who facing
our universal fears of being as individuality found,
Surviving the blinding freeze of vertigo, we can stand alone.

A portal into wider worlds by golden and silver keys
taught to reckon & read, lay down & direct memories
But there are levels of such portals & on each level
we long for more or struggle to be satisfied with our one &
Only painting on a canvass or choice to call its emptiness art.

The SphereFarmer & the Farmer's wife, white lightning
in their hands, they full of meaningless laughter
We annoyed by those who cannot handle their spirits
or worse, She in the sky beckoning, reaching, a source of
Fear, but sometimes evil ones along the way become our saviors.

These pages of parchment, fibers made of driftwood soaked
on which we write the magic words, floor plans & recipes
Become pages made of light, in former times thought crazy
in those passed into exuding into that world drunken dreams
Yet in the dream of unicorns magic & our souls come home again.

If indeed a dream can dream or the daylight then a dull forever
for to enter the highest level, the Farmer's wife high in
Her alcove above the arcade entry into the tunnel of love &
skeletons to scare the ladies into the arms of sailors
Is to face our highest unknowns & fears, those too beyond ideas of vanishing.

Can we know if a unicorn can break out and prove things in the margins & between the lines...?

* * * * * *

I made this comment on this blog Here:
which I found from a blogger I follow on Intangible Materiality

Gentlemen,

I venture to suggest there are other reasons possible than the impetus to colonize a galaxy- for eventually that galaxy will shrink and become isolated anyway in the very long run.

I do not see our becoming some sort of virtual or digital singularity nor the necessary need for resources as a likely idea- nor that a civilization self-destructs at some point in its own achievement of technology.

I see the distinct possibility that civilizations, not just some disembodied sentience, find better ways to turn the vacuum into useful worlds and spaces before the need to explore what amounts to after all enough room in a galaxy to insure the rising of at least one world of life - maybe the uncanny idea of isolation as if we specially created really applies to the galaxy level- after all in Einstein's time it thought but the only island.

The PeSla at www.pesla.blogspot.com
who just happens to have brought up such speculation lately.

* * *

I found this again and meant to post it for a reminder as a reference- a general way to view Sukodu as the hypercube:

* * * * *

The Dark Continuum

2012-01-23T13:17:00.018-06:00

The Dark Continuum L. Edgar Otto Jan.23,2012 Did Einstein riding his ray of light reach the mountaintops inside his corpuscle faith, Phaeton wild his electrodynamic motorbike ride coming so close to the shift of Mercury and the irrelevant proof of relativity that we need more than Newton to explain black holes and the color shift of light in a gravitational field, roses and violets and doubled or half angles in some signs of times dilatation or reversals?

Lubos has an example, not with the modified formulas involved, of this debate that continues over the role of where the classical fits in- and this is a suggestion he sees for the need for a string level of new theories. I do not know how solid the ideas I put forth on this post are that has to creatively imagine still another sense of the vacuum beyond the absolute nothingness or some vibration virtual fields and the new physics views and more of super-symmetries also seen in this trivial sense of a third idea of a vacuum. I also suspect that our wildest speculations so far on the idea of Dark fluids, forces, energy, matter can also have this simple conceptual explanation that is at least refreshingly different even if above the physicality what there is of it of things like charged branes. We can dwell on all the views we want going so far, and choose from the totality what sort of group applies to some plane- and by brute intuition and analogy extend again into the freedom of a vertical direction.

Is it said that in the history of things part of the search in the background for the intelligibility of the world as physics or between the objective and subjective in philosophy (a place for souls or demons) some third thing which for Newton at least he felt it as if Spirit and who knows, maybe in the sober awakening to come when we have learned enough we may find something there beyond our little plane geometry games on the Hellas sand.

Newton, our last great astrologer and a humble man we think who did take up the thoughts of others to build upon and enhance, those who rode the higher gravity of heavens down to earth in the infinite speed of flight... also wanted to know about the prophesy as of any memory of causation grounded and guaranteed. Is this not a poetic way to find the bible codes hidden in the symbols, combination's and information stepchild now considered science?

But let me not lead you astray, this is the first germ or inoculation of a creative and new idea, and there is much to do, and the world and I need your help in the quest and the learning.

* * * * *

The Learning Machine (VI)

The spiraling moving code within us does not direct us as
all in all some selfish chance & fittest genes
Deep from some dance on an onion layer within
nor can we escape our view of worlds, of gods, not
Reduced to symmetries like its laws, a center of four winds

We find our way through the maze & catacomb's unwinding
a ball of fateful string cut then woven into cloth
Or we leave a trail through crossroads at the signposts made from
the endless basket of wisdom that gives us but breadcrumbs
Only too often gleaned by sniffing whiskered hungry eyes
or ourselves with no thought for the morrow already there.

But dreams are like this, the source & sink of warmth within
to which like the eighty styles of endlessly patterned
Snowflakes encompasses where drama's finite themes begin & end
always in such plays & twists & turns it where we came in.
Even in dreams rehearsals to train us for some reversals.

Have faith if we dedicate a net of nerves around our hearts
to some transmitter & antennae or lure that others exist
Or for that matter even some aggregate of worlds
where it is meaningful to decode symbols & hand prints
Painted in prayer, our story on cave walls.

That our story is copied, stolen, fading or enhanced
a record from our narrow stretch of time, written
In & for the dark, lost the thousand acorns &
forgotten the time capsules & who behind the names
On crumbling gravestones & as all, we observe lost
in thirst in an ascetic desert we are moved
To write our diaries in blood, a salty sea, all there is left.

* * *

The Learning Machine (VII)

The hat brim ring of Saturn subdued by needed near
living together the four generations, parents of the gods
Doubled coned & shaped like "M" rhino hair horns with a scorpion sting.

The ironwork that looks like a lizard hold up the
Singer sewing machine made in Occupied Japan, copied
Even to the nicks & casting errors seen a gargoyle wabi to perfection
we who karate chopped the flotilla in Manila soon to be outdone
That war for the West, the Pacific, Co-prosperity frontier.

A sixteen year old girl plays Magellan for a year not
intercepted, Spain & Lewis & Clark, her own Sacagawea, & vPocahontas,
Her legend gone to myth, sound barrier pilots now routine bus drivers.

Nature keeps the balance of betrayals out of sight &
never comes to mind, oppressive humid workdays for dreamers
Risking too much for encouragement, Olympic pipes, Guinness World Records
forgiveness for the rabbit 'backer & heroin, the Feast of
Saturn all the ambiance & style trumped by the heroine, the
timeless voice of Etta James still breaking through the silence.
Horses, autobahns; elephants & tanks; submarines ironclad,
the bob-wire fence of bayonets, fame undone in cattle calls,
You were so thin your diet of popcorn balls, my exotic model.

I walk along the river James, the shore near Hollywood
where presidents North & South are buried, where a
Stray workman's hammer falls breaking glass, their mummy's turn to dust.
or a necklace made of vertebrae & shivers up my spine.

But I did not want to write it this way, but only pure
images far into the surreal, deeper secrets to reveal.

* * *

The Learning Machine (VIII)

The firmament is self-defraging where odd loops of
photons meet. One who interacts with his own self-energy
does neither add nor subtract wisdom from his Book of Life
unless he encounters others.

Real or not their images nor how far extends the trees
in the gardens of Feynman, nor how deep into the
quarks inside the quarks no phantom Maxwell's demon
Breaks apart, converges to one integral whole number
Mysteriously that the wave trains dance in perpendicular planes
upon some simple schemes & signs, really no surprises.

Our messages of Love cycle & trade doubts & faith
alternating our spectrum's lines of colours & interferences
Combining or destroying each other in & out of
existence, some cap to the limits of our energy,
Some minimum entropy that togetherness persists.

There is little difference between the sky of stars
& the count, mahogany your flowering sunfed freckles
Or some stream we make way for the metaphor of milk
& its anodyne rush to sleep against life's pain
Why does the child of thrush bring a glove of bling
for the right hand of God, romancing a thriller, the Moon-walker?
A blanket from his loins, her thighs & for your Prince
& princess what an alloy azure amalgam of their eyes.

Too soon at the last hour recovering reborn fame, how in
this world's sweet non-necessity, the man self-shadowed
Shadow lost from Peter Pan made whole, to leave the game.

* * *

The Learning Machine (IX)

Can we ever enter or go beyond the Dark Continuum
perpendicular to everything its grasp like some philosophic dimension?

Infinitely divisible yet unity everywhere & when its span &
depths & self compliments distinguish the opaque, a Null.

Know ye not you have dwelt there often, some discovered
focus of perception, laughed at doctors caught still in distortions
Dismayed but telling little lies, covering up their actions think you do not know
unaware a prayer can change, recreate the world
So rare the power, perhaps beyond unique a mystic vision
you the creator or conduit for higher things or little things
cloud sculpture, painting sunsets

What beyond time travel or your dreaming can you make
new here on the rock & dirt on a roll but your self's intelligible design?
scry for lost things, induce tornadoes eating trailer parks only in your own now,
it matters not your actions as the author.

Such a fine line, falsely quarter drawn between the good &
evil, sanity discerned of skies likewise a confabulation
Their faith healing roles, even preachers lost from faith
pass the host & wine, mortal nature oft physician to herself
You told that you are the confused one, your demons &
angelic voices unreal as is the necessity of their commands
The declare, although your mind the final authority, testimony,
that you cannot distinguish good from evil, a danger even to
Yourself & out of sync, do not fit in to group standards,
in truth only your superstitious Beast made our of lost faith
in your art and intuitions

Perhaps that you just do not care or trust to listen,
so bearing others burdens who think someone can teach them how to live
That in your honesty & innocence you know you cannot
beat into them what must be lead out from their within
How then in your own style struggle with your art
can you as mentor teach art therapy class to others?

Of course our need, & world requires our gods as artists
not Jack the Dripper from His Big Dipper on the canvass of
Our soul in His own way, dismay six days of experiment a long while
as falls, appears by chance as if a miracle, Mona Lisa's smile.

* * * *

These are very relevant science articles today:

newscientist

"In the real world, vortices eventually disappear as their energy dissipates due to viscosity. But as this demo shows, they could continue indefinitely in ideal fluids. Although there are no existing fluids with these properties, simulations of the scenario are useful tools for simplifying complex fluid flow problems."

sciencedaily

"The reason for this perplexing behavior is subtle. Water forms chemical or hydrogen bonds with certain surfaces, while the attraction of water to other surfaces is dictated by non-bonding interactions called van der Waals forces. These non-bonding forces are not unlike a nanoscale version of gravity, Koratkar said. Similar to how gravity dictates the interaction between Earth and the sun, van der Waals forces dictate the interaction between atoms and molecules."

* * * * *

Are Gravity and Matter Illusions

2012-01-22T13:48:00.007-06:00

Are Gravity and Matter Illusions L. Edgar Otto Jan. 21/22, 2012

In the cover illustration to this post I realized the description of the zeros in the nilpotent algebra with a physical bias over the synthetic mathematical abstraction of Peter Rowland's philosophy- my quasic fulfilling his criteria but with a wider or different conclusion (before the fact of reading him or anyone- but I must admit it took awhile as he advised to understand his book in depth) that what he was describing about the zeros in the algebra was already described in the dimensions here involved as if the limit of cycles and ottonions for such grids in whatever form of symmetry breaking. Now, we can say this extends , as he says may even describe parallel universes in the idempotent model I imagine- but the issue of such philosophies of number certainly contrasts the more speculative theories of our time as to what is reasonably sound math or physics grounding and experimental reaches- for how can we not contrast the idea of inflation scenarios at odds with the idea of baby universe scenarios as a product of this level of human intuitive reasoning although not resolved. That mass or energy relates to the space or is not related, or related in a sort of organic but unified way over local and continuous if not imaginary time is still a question relating to light itself upon its still not quite explainable source. Light changes space and space the light as well the choice or recognition of charge in potentially time traveling spinning systems- but what of the idea of infinite velocity of spin and so on? One thing for sure, and I am not sure if he will be widely read or how one might really peer review his work and his allies in the net or other hard cover journal publications, is that in the casual learning I encountered those with ideas of the foundations of which they would do well to know about certain objections or enhancements to their theories before they assert what they seem to know of a system, their system, or the beauty we as learning creatures feel thereof. The again if the free speech of the world is not open and the birthright of all of us how can there be a world of free enquirey?

"Looking back, the SphereDream, fifth dimension of my Godhead, my soul integrating through time and that metaphor of the endless beach and the one central city of Far-Rock'a'bye in which Olney had is adventures parallel to this world, and to the eschatology of worlds, SpheresEnd."

"As a child in the back seat of the old two toned '53 Chevy at the square dog drive in- you see someone had the cleaver idea to slice hot dogs and put them between two slices of white bread, needless to say the Whooper at about the same time survived to this day- I was deep in thought and asked my father what is beauty, I just do not understand it. He dismissed it saying it will come to me as he was rather busy ordering and all. I felt like I had lost something and was lacking something I might never understand. Something important.

Once I asked my Dad what if I could finally explain magnetism- he an electronic engineer and all.
Nothing much he said- they would just put your name into a big obscure book - but it did not dampen my curiosity or that he was not excited as we can dream too much to present to him some thought or vision.

Yet in the looking back I would probably say to myself- you are a little young to understand that for theories and causes Beauty can be very seductive and lead you to her path."

The Learning Machine (III)

Together we are salt, neutral and equal,
interlaced our lattices, solid & square, my points &
your body centered, rare of Earth and coarse the savor on
our taste buds - compact to crystallization my body
your centered heart, of one unique yet disembodied soul
so close and set, once our distance of love is measured

So what does it matter to the gods, blind within ourselves
to Love's compliments if Love goes one way or is
mutual attraction, the same description really?

Not just the God-fer-sure copper warms our world, cracks &
polar shifts & bouts of island making lava.
But the chaffing of our surprises & let downs, vibrations
that can be dissolved & diluted taking passion's permanance
fore-granted as if the sins of love have sparks & room to be
passed to our offspring.

The crystalline abyss in the creative center of the Earth
builds in us as does the desire from hope amplified
beyond the source of light that time has its compensations
as a comforter. The gods prime the pumps, conserve the seed crop.

What can I say as we read all & none of the mind of
our lover, her orbit to enter from forever for there to leave
again - so close the dream on which requited love depends,
but one unique message in the Latte sky & blue, pretend
in peace that we knew, one passed this way, His message true,
who loved you.

* * *

The Learning Machine (IV)

What do you see beyond the intangible materiality
spirits of the air, echoes of the dead, a holy host?
Spacemen once the gods but now the gnome & gnats, gnarly
knot holes full of demons singing upward, conjuring Zeus's lightning?
Afraid as the world is pulled by good and evil spectres
your stumble or dive off the mountaintop, become the Beast?
Or that its you who create such songs lost into the
cold & oxygen thin wind, boiling at blood temperature?

Perhaps snow blind for it is you full of desire to speak
words unsaid or not spoken, nor a simple goodbye or
Good voyage, accepted closure in parting wakes aware
that will not let go finding his flesh dust less than a beast?
I say to you, shadow to shadow in reflections, each a
one way mirror of heavier weights of waves & circumstance,
Our fortunes tangled that my burden seems the worse
for those around me who survived to me as if
Vanishing in time & space while I still haunt this Earth.

No Beast or angelic soul can race Zeno down
the rabbit hole, nor jump all the way up or down
The shells of turtles holding up the worlds
meant or never meant to be, their time said come &
Filled complete after the fact & fall into the firmament.

At least we in our wounded stupor, no clock for our coma
in the light of day trading our summers until all
Winters gone, we at the anti-poles of anti-poles and so on...
know well but cannot make the leap that the truly
Departed feel joy & grief & dismay still by us beyond forlorn.

* * *

The Learning Machine (V)

Individuality & uniqueness do not always match,
be the same singularity where the universe unique is
That one & only moment & near miss as once you came
so close to the dream but we never passed a kiss.

Half dazed, amazed at how the bagpipes hum and hang
so many granite valley echoes beckoning in the
Landscape not all explored or dreamt about as stars
* dust age * merge inevitability incomplete given
Infinite time looking back & going back, you spinning Dervish.

If the wormhole of your gut, outside contained inside,
you thin is yours internalizing the universe is too long
To endure its coiled up folded snake which way
points out from the mouth of lies begins at the wrong end
Hungry for the truth, weapons of deceit, if that matters,
then over wings of time no hopeful monsters would
Be here to dream, feel secure awhile in the world.

Time and space, its gravities & energies, where everlasting
are neither conserved or not-conserved, the eternities
For as time and matter is illusion beyond the see-saw
between solidity & nothingness, all vibrations real &
Virtual, absolute, mass & time seem like that dream of a God,
although Heaven can seem solid, sure to gain by paths
Beyond the furnaces of liquid helium & lead & coal ash.

But even the Buddha returned again & again must find &
learn, reach the end of his enlightenment's, or the
Once & only Prophet, His single & unique echo must ride
his visions of a higher sky tinkering with his zen motorcycle.
Joseph too must teach the Vision with us, carpentry.

* * * * * *

And a reply from Lubos:

Lubos,

I wonder if in some sense string theory once grounded (say limiting the number of possible vacua) surpasses quantum theory or is another deeper variation. Maybe this is but a philosophic stance- do you think the physics is primary that directs our math or the mathematics is primary? But your statement that the variations are not incompatible is a great step in unification.

The PeSla

Lubos Motl
Dear The PeSla,

your question is an interesting one, and the answer is multidimensional. String theory is 1) fully mathematically equivalent to a quantum field theory in various superselection sectors, 2) string theory is another quantum field theory because it preserves various inequalities and analyticities that may be proven for a pretty generic QFT although ST is the only example where they are actually saturated, 3) string theory is a generalization of QFT.

ST may look "totally new" because unlike QFT in the bulk, it contains UV-complete quantum gravity; at the same moment, it is"as conservative an extension" of QFT as you can get because anything more "revolutionary" is probably guaranteed to be inconsistent.

I think that in the inner structure of things, maths is primary and physics is the most important and most universal "application" of some maths, the important one.

* * * *

I wonder if by generalizing Feymann diagrams some of us mean something different than my quasic view or say the application of groups as a secondary thing beyond a certain cycling? String theory by what Lubos says certainly would be such a generalization if it is already a generalization of the quantum theory.

But let us go a little deeper to make sense of the metaphysics of the above poems, I mean say the question of the observed force of the virtual contributions to the mass of a particle and the evidence of the Casmir force and the idea that the brane like objects of spheres and planes may have a direction as to the placement of charge and its sign- at least in an (Omnic) universe on the run. Now if a spinning ray of light also exhibits this phenomenon of time travel (not my idea but more like others and of course Godel, Einstein riding a frame dragged spinning ray of light like a cat that always falls on his feet but he is sandwiched between to slices of toast and the jelly side is up which of course always falls jelly side down. I do not know in the quantum world how conservative its extensions- but such a thing we should investigate if we can make the claim we can create matter from the raw and independent not able to have characterization non-necessary nothingness that may involve some natural restraint in itself and its unity. But here we should ask the obvious anyway- it appears in some theories at least that matter in some sense is here and could have been created or will end in the eschatology of the once or forever or the ultimate resolution of ideas of spin as well as complexity at endtimes or times that are real in any scenario of expanding ideas or baby universes and so on. Here we find the old anthropocentric argument as a concrete proof of reasoning or a cop out- as the questions remains still open and we cannot read while in it beyond the covers of our books.

As a crude first blush idea, revolutionary or revolting, could the nothingness before the breath of the universe's time become the absolute continuum and ground of mass after the universes deeper directed arrow of time? The again the quasic idea has this concept rather built in- it already addresses the dynamics of the aggregate and still wants to understand the spinning universe once stilled from some view and its dark matter-energy within. How can there be an universe if matter and time are illusions- how can we count on the momenta to make mathematical and physical sense of things when they are conserved or not, a universe of logic complete or not unto the level of things that we need to describe all we physically may know of this world?

* * * * *

Triality, Simpler Times, Checky Shores, and Learning Machines

2012-01-21T14:15:00.013-06:00

Triality, Simpler Times, Checky Shores, and Learning Machines L. Edgar Otto Jan. 20/21, 2012

Jesse Prinz has an article on Newscientist I cannot access: But systems of learning as philosophy and cosmology I have given a continuum all of its own called- Neotericontinuum . This is all I can see of the newscientist pre-comments to the link:

'Human beings are learning machines,' says philosopher
INTERVIEW: 12:00 20 January 2012
Prevailing wisdom holds that we are born with an innate understanding of the world. No, argues Jesse Prinz: we learn a lot of it for ourselves
This inspired parts of the first two of a planned series of poems called The Learning Machine as science sites often do- and Ron Kollman, a Christian in the coffee shop and the idea of Beasts and Monsters, and a deeper understanding of the philosophy of science of Peter Rowlands in regards to uniqueness and quantum theory where to him physics determines the mathematics. Also my struggles of my roommate Erik- the artist I illustrate here with often- in his struggle with internal Beasts caught between the Lutherans and the Buddhists in his attempts as self healing.

The Learning Machine (I) L. Edgar Otto 01-20-12

The woodland sunflowers thrive in their season
by the river in profusion on the old growth forest floor.

They vanish sometimes forever their reflection at one
with the world living & learning on the short & long
run their once and only allotted days unique their carefree
count of petals & hours, uprooting floods & withering droughts.

The discovery of the last woodland sunflower becomes my
obsession, for she is the first, born again with Love,
the one & only true center of our world. The outside, other parts
beyond us invisible, walled off, no threat in time or space
to the totality of our destiny & privacy.

Neither of us were fit, without wounds, & yet our
memories of them so remote in the past & we did
not think about how far our universe creating kisses
could ever be an end of worlds into the future. Only
the gods have a long memory, but they were so far away
to care or see our rapid heartbeats.

Such love colours our world, buttercup golden chins,
daisy chains & the double explosion of dandelions
before they go to seed & our whispering sweet nothing
breaths launch them too soon into the boundless wind.

We count the petals - She loves me, she loves me not-
to some uncertain end. Not satisfied with what
by chance we think or want of answers our timeless &
eternal bond not broken reaches for another flower
so the count begins anew again.

* * *

The Learning Machine (II)

Some of us cannot out run the Beast. We can only
leap out of the deeps of his dark waters only to
fall back again in an exhausting game of out of reach.

He slows us all down from our climbing to shore, makes us
choose the lesser evil so beaching us en masse, growing limbs
walking tall against the natural heavier weight of gravity
our struggle promises we can reach the moon & stars.

His the treacle, molasses slow, that gives us mass
in the spiral shelled diffuse flesh protected in
the greater freedom in all directions in the water &
to the four corners of the Ocean. We the scurriers &
self-determining choosers of our paths,
makers of light & warning colors to our own kind.

He, our self & unseen ever present center draws
us down indirectly into the maelstrom we
swim against to tack our fins and sails at right
angles taking from our strength and time as we
backtrack with no clues to which was time's currents flow,
lost in our taking chances, safety in circles on the waves,
trajectories in fountain cannon spewing jets or of water spouts &
our promiscous global cluster bonds save by numbers
in the parabolic herd.

Left alone we try to keep some balance, walk the sagging
tightrope in the strait line & while our freedom is boundless
it is empty in all but the fall in whose direction, like in dreams
we may wake up- or hope there is the safety net, we who spend so
much time lazy like the ancient lizards in the sun.

Into his locker realm at the bottoms of the sea &
center of the moral maze or mysterious labyrinth we
navigate by the sound if we lose one handed touch by
running into or beating our heads into a wall, seeing but
so far our lonely turns and twists.

We also consume the memories of others voraciously or
in ritual communions of sacrifice, so many flat worms taught
to seek & divine our livers. We reach too high in the Mercuric
effervescence of our comment Vulcan rise, blinded by the other Sun,
closer our flying fish wax wings.

* * * *

And a video of a primitive experiment called Triality or Quarks in a Spectral Field.

* * * * *

Lubos,

I wonder if in some sense string theory once grounded (say limiting the number of possible vacua) surpasses quantum theory or is another deeper variation. Maybe this is but a philosophic stance- do you think the physics is primary that directs our math or the mathematics is primary? But your statement that the variations are not incompatible is a great step in unification.

The PeSla

* *
To Riofrio's blog:

I am sorry to hear that our world is not safe for enquiry or that anyone would be excluded from our right to learn and know.

Why in a peaceful world would Iran or anyone need nukes that take away from the mouths of its people- the ancient states should know this better than the West.

And Carl, I get your point but there are no necessary realities beyond our common sense- I do not think we can leave Iran to its own isolated Korean state of hell and starvation if it threatens to promote proliferation to say Venezuela.

Exploring the 2592 Zeros of 25 Standard Particles

2012-01-20T12:09:00.016-06:00

Exploring the 2592 Zeros of 25 Standard Particles L. Edgar Otto January 20, 2012

"We are not always aware of our creative and intuitive artistic accentuation's or when they connect over general time or when for the why of causality, that if lucky, our unique thoughts intelligibly and meaningfully cohere with the totality."

"A given dialog in its time reaches an entropy where nothing new can be said or resolved beyond blind shouting. A given theory system ages. It brought back from some hibernation or coma awhile and from a futuristic view all such systems decohere."
Quoting from myself while the writing...

The Source, Weight, & Uniqueness Problem Remains (of thoughts on the Good or God, this equivalent question remains analogously also)

Emphasis is give to "symmetry breaking" over some more foundational aspects of the mathematics and physics, such as an emphasis (and say privileging- even the assumption that duplicated structures are presumed to be the field of gravity or certain coordinates at rest-) of groups and invariants over the physicality of substance, contents.

The source, weight & uniqueness may not always be part of one symmetrical problem, as a quasi-unfied total theory. Thus, in a sense this is a symmetry breaking within thought itself. Clearly consciousness as such is suggested, but not necessarily part of the same unity of descriptions, Love & gravity as haunting 5th elements.

So we infer or even place into our mathematics & logic, science and its philosophy, creatively, some obvious fact or statements of axiom that is the stable & unique case, the Being given, the convincing but doubted obvious even if by hidden reasons.

(in the informal mix up in dim light, useful errors and free hand sketching of the graphs and nearly illegible symbols, I had my doubts that the explorations found anything reliably useful although I have been know to appreciate the necessary abandonment in the short achievements of the Rubik's cube for later solutions.

Part of this, even in string theory, is the incorporation of ideas like symmetry into the subject of thermodynamics beyond its development of its first two laws.

It is the case, by natural or deep observation (some shadow thoughts are taken seriously as an explanation for the accounting of mass by conservation laws and methods- namely, that last one standing of energy.) experiment and its variations, with our without underlying laws, that particles exist, sources and patterns persist and obey some laws, and weight measured that can be "verified" unto the abilities and depths of observation, including principles of exchanges assumed always present and ubiquitous between entities, even the questioned conservation laws and minimums of mass-energy & vacua, and entropy is linked conceptually to passing time as source.

But the totality itself can be, ultimately, unproved such that it can independently be "falsified" - open and symmetrical as thermodynamic scientific systems, as well thought's mirror inversions.

We are free to assert a philosophy, even incomplete in general senses, within a context. Yet, even within irreducibility and complexity of our systems, what guarantee have we for a general unique theory of the Everything?

If such laws are exact we could create matter from a pure vacuum, worlds. Fields of pure vibration but a stepping stone this is perhaps another way to state the theme of zombies and faeries raised with this problem that remains.

* * *

I notice that in the realm of evolution and structures of inheritance that the assertion of Darwin as the fact (natural selection) is modified in wider contexts of information such that some totalities do influence the evolving patterns, as well the first but not only pattern from bean traits and how they are passed on.

Some laws are assumed too specific, like Bode's Law, specially created and improbable for solar system structures. Is ours the best of possibilities as the unique idea on which its matter finds the perfect centering. So it is like Kepler a scientific systems (if we take falsifiable as the benchmark even when the idea moves on and fades at least partly into mysticism. For such a law is after all conceived in three space and inverse square viriality considerations. If we imagine things like planets in pairs and laws for some of their orientation in concert we should at least stack the 4D polytopes as the underlying seemingly hidden geometry to which any system should resolve to the general case of system structure- conditions favorable to earth-like life for example. But it is clear also that even further generalizations of dimensions are needed- a third realm at least descending from the size of Pluto. Here we can imagine the need for discrete and continuous, closed and open views to find at least being partly resolved but applying throughout a stereonomic structural system.
Such theories may need to arise again with new hindsight as with any experiencing of time, subjective or objective.

I asked myself, as the doubts though lesser are periodic- why do we do this blogging of the promotion or understanding of ideas, sometimes only half aware of their uniqueness or originality- I usually find even the random jottings at least as an example of simple but expanded arithmetic or counting of grids- and the flying in the vastness of higher dimensions, having something to post worthwhile after all. But then openness is my game in the freedom of speech in a world that keeps its freedom of enquiry open and with due consideration for merit and mature uses of finances and distribution of resources for all peoples. But if I had known this blogging would continue so long- if monetized, I could have afforded pen and paper.

* * * * *

Of course the four generation case for particles (so called exotic hadrons) is the subject at hand for such levels of quasications. That the four implies in a sort of time direction as a fifth for a source like current or motion is a key point- that and we examine the 4th and 5th inter-dimensional groups and systems. But so far I have not in the playing with numbers found systems beyond the squaring of the 5 patterns (that is 5 x 5 x 5) that is encompassed by these higher generations (that is my symbols in my script of G sub n. On which ground we stand in these issues is the foundations of the foundations we begin to find with certainty of our physics systems.

* * *

From yesterdays post on Sudoku a comment from Scott on my facebook: I find Scott most interesting in that once a game is played he can recall the moves and show us possible variations- would this ability be as exacting going forward as well.

Scott Curler Mr Otto.... solving Sudoku is like trying to solve chess mathematically.... in many cases the numbers may work out, but there are exceptions to the "rule" that keep the mind entertained and the beauty/joy is in the blurring of the math/numbers of what should theoretically work and what actually does. Puts a different perspective on it though, thank you for posting

L. Edgar Otto Scott, very astute points- glad we discussed the psychology and mathematics of the chess game over the years- especially useful from our best chess player in the coffee shop.

* * *

Relevant from Sci Mags: neural-network-gets-an-idea-of-number-without-counting

Also: first-secure-quantum-computer-is-blind-to-its-own-bits

* * *

Quasic Permutation and Sukodu Grid Projects

2012-01-19T12:28:00.012-06:00

Quasic Permutation and Sukodu Grid Projects
L. Edgar Otto (The Pe Sla) January 19, 2012

Of all the related Sukodu solutions the final array I will regard as a standard for now, it does not contain diagonal solutions. The minimum clue can be 16 or less including what we may understand from the grid shape and number alone. Of all the zillions of related number solutions I follows those closely related even when they did not appear in two space as a solution to see what happens in their three space representation. There are many ways to explore this fundamental symmetry operation and apply it to things like particle physics. The notation suggests a much wider view of the influence of duality, three dimensionality, and viriality in the next low dimensions some try to confine space and its compliments within.

Perhaps it is time I finally got some of these methods computerized. I also need to enlarge the grid of 81 as writing in it was so very small and I had to up the lighting at night. But the graph papers helped and fortunately and intuitively they were designed for other purposes earlier on in this blog.

I note in the last "clue standard page" that we can have also diagonal planes that include the nine numbers.

This is a new way to see where the absolute chance and probability meets the absolute determinate cause and mechanism as a foundation for what seems to encompass our useful informational possibilities of physical dynamics including the biological structures.

The philosophy of this page may likewise integrate some ideas of consciousness or make the issue clearly besides the project- but it does not address the foundations or existence and our greater concept of uniqueness in the realm of the gods.

As to twistors resolving naturally or by default to the idea of gravity this needs a further generalization with the quasic permutations in mind and is after all an existence relation of inertial things such as what defines mass. What in fact decides the quasic weight between the generations? Complexity, numbers, coincidence?
I hope these view raise the bar for the theoretical calculations of our finite particles and infinite group matrices- after all, in matters of the dimensionless in both the concern of Eddington and Dirac this is the logical quasic generational state of the geometry of the universe... As things seem to more or less intelligibly match- or that they may appear to expand and accelerate upon some foundations generalized as to patterns and formuli, on the small and great scales of things, we should generalize both the finite number of particles in the universe (or as Eddington says the Uranoid) to the parameters of mass and gravity intelligibly connected (as Dirac intuits), or the issues of steady states or the universe arising from singularity, the philosophy should concern these symmetries, (the HyperUranoid).

* * * * *

Natural and Deep Symmetry

2012-01-18T09:58:00.008-06:00

Natural and Deep Symmetry L. Edgar Otto January 18, 2012

In the natural dimensions certain patterns persist regardless of the content of the numbers or sub-regions the Euclidean (plane) familiar n-space. I hoped that this approach, the natural dimensions on which we can fit the puzzles (Soma for example) into intelligible assemblies as a matter of local trial and error to which the artistic in us does not see that these may be in higher depths of mathematical connections globally, that this approach would give me the formulas for all the solutions by space theory of the 240 Soma sets where the "Jigsaw Sukodu" of several regions also across the plane as bilaterally symmetric, and in its representation in three space.

This came from a look again at the permutations of Sukodu (Extreme) in the form that has also two diagonals containing the nine numbers- and the symmetrical across the plane.

The classification from the inside or inversion- a deep Soma formula is not a matter of natural symmetry but of deep dimensional symmetry so far- I also suspect that 16 may have a solution (despite the exhaustive enumeration by computers) but this may be only a deep concept relating to deep symmetries- or a borderline or frontier intuition caused by unclear partial visions into the depths.

I also relate closer my recreations with the 30 color cube and deep permutation and dimensional theory such as that of Kea that goes beyond the natural or shallow symmetries albeit these the springboard for all of our intuitions.

I see that TGD posts today again on the generalization of Feymann diagrams as a proposal with promise (not from my view looking back from the actual implementation of this idea- I posted independently in previous blog posts- but it really shows the need for a generalization of the idea of matrices in general before we can be said to naturally use the group idea- such as the dihedral to operate on the matrix.

So such a generalization that we seem to be heading toward or dwelling in are all the same description:

1. The nature of symmetry in the quasic grid is or contains such a generalization if that is meant the symmetry of natural space and group theory involved.

2. The ideas of permutation and braiding of Kea in the intuition on the depths (as usual these debates go beyond the nature-nurture as that of instinct and intellect), as I show in the color cube theories, is or contains such a generalization. This is true for her use of the matrices as modeled by others as to what sort of main diagonals are involved.

3. In the use of number theory and ideas from modern physics (including the usual considerations of what is classical that falls from it if not that means natural) the aspirations of TGD seem to be leading to this sort of thing or converges to the intuitive idea of it, p-adics can also be such a generalization or leads to it.

4. This is not, as deep, a matter of metaphysics or philosophy only- for I can imagine in knot theory our ability to invoke matter from raw space- and that so far is in the realm of speculation only. There are generalizations beyond Feymann's reductions.

5. PeSla's and Kea's approaches emphasizes the informational aspects to ground the deep intuitions. This is not just a matter of debate for the objects we can be sure of as proposed (for example why do the neutrinos change flavors in the first place?) The Koide formula is an example as to which side of the depths and natural span we regard as solid science.

6. It is clear also that the planes, that is in general branes, and the polytopes generalized of Coxeter, are also the generalization again of Feymannian quantum ideas.

7. Ideas on partitions of space itself has to eventually merge the natural dimensional and the deep dimensional symmetry views.

* * * * *
Associated Associahedra I thought I would check the spelling on a google search and found my posting first on the images and also in the text this most interesting pdf paper:
posted 3:30 PM CST at library.

On the Koide-Chrome Spectrum

2012-01-17T11:43:00.005-06:00

On the Koide-Chrome Spectrum L. Edgar Otto July 17, 2012

So far my use of color in notations has not really been some problem of an extended spectrum even when these are ordered along those lines- but more like color wheels. So today I offer two "quasic grid" views of what happens when we shift the spectrum over various levels of the natural dimensions of abstract motions. As complicated as these diagrams appear it is only one such case within the three and four dimensions that involves the shifting of the point elements, other subcells and things like curves can be seen if the graphs are developed.

In my haste my notation may be seen to contain errors at the remote ends of the binominal expansion of these abstract motions. Note, the shift sign is from music, the C cleft. But that is where the subjective or intuitive issue is distracting, for we go beyond the simple idea of extending (as Newton did) Pascal's triangle to negative values to absolute zeros of rest for functions in the general space and more so the null polytope- that is conventionally Pi sub minus one in notation but it means that part of an expansion of a simplex that is the Null value (we can extend this to plus or minus 2 or 2pi for the usual reasons.) The effect is to have this concept apply to the orthogons which as powers seem to fill only positive space. Thus the simplex pattern generalized fills space with the simplex patterns which is a logical pattern and the basis of much context for patterns equal or greater than 4 for physics and even that intuited and embellished by the sister to numerology- that is sacred geometry.

Lubos does state in the ever adding to modify errors (as if the idea of a four perturbations I imagine as permutations of which he too sees as an advancement in physics does not evoke the divisions by 24) - I note also that post today by Pitkanen and Leo Vulk address this issue from some viewpoint on knots themselves) where Lubos points out that it amounts to we do not know the mass of the tau quark which is the issue at hand is it not? How can he use a hamburger as an example and not first reduce it to a perfect sphere where some theory would find the right poles in the Majorana phase shifts of information on some? But more importantly, did Euler not sum certain positive series to negative values of 1/3 in a way not understood and thought an error?

If 3/3 is seen as trivial over space (and in relation to Pitkanen with his comments today with hammed I did choose to show the first example and the numerology on the surface of 4 space motions in three space- that and I had the graph paper conveniently just printed out for other things.) It is clear that the symmetries involved in a 4 by 4 hypercube in this more integrated koidechrome space of so many cubes does not matter in which space direction we read the quasic ordering even if we do not have the first pixel (in cyan) at 0000 in which to compare them. More over of a physical constructable of 4 space into 3 space we again triple the possibilities at least or double those to achieve the 24 cell group numbers upon the division of the 1152 group of cells. The physicality of a complete description without the centered or the reference transitive identity local zero coordinate is for this reason that in a higher dimensional system the existence of these definite patterns can be physically tentative over some further approximations to time and probabilities after all.

Now, might this not relate to what some call the UV or IR problem in current theory or UV catastrophes in general? But in no case am I trying to challenge anyone's theories here, just trying to make things a little more clear. It is where we share ideas that intersect that can raise some confusions more than what is unknown and I find our bloggers at work very hard in the beautiful realms of math of physics.

* * * * *

Where is the Chaos In Quantum Theory

2012-01-16T15:58:00.005-06:00

Where is the Chaos In Quantum Theory L. Edgar Otto Jan. 16, 2012

How is the answer to this old question coming along? I am posting a video Here called quantumchaos redoing the childhood experiment- take it as a parable or metaphor- it was much easier to do more accurate experiments with the things around me then. But there are new ways to see things. For one thing the ink was rather concentrated, I expected the drop to become a torus then break along the ring to other Tori and so on. Recall where 8 figures into the chaoscience.

I had less luck with the oil drop in alcohol and water as their was not enough alcohol but it was good enough to shake into many little drops- then to add the ink. The idea was to contrast what happens with this contrast of states or levels of the system. Eventually it settled down into a stable pattern. Now that pattern could change slowly or if the temperature changes as in a lava lamp. I post a photo of the still state (why make a video if it does not change?) but from this with all the variables can one go back to say what the state of the universe was from the different dynamics of layers and oil and water involved if it is a steady state? What does that say about our initial conditions and states of entropy- or on a more formal level of gravity and energy as if density of aggregate matter? Can Alice run so fast she stays in place? Does the pattern among many of the stars in the universe have a general sense of motion when there are places the objects stay at rest as in in one sum of dimensions?

I also post a two dimensional version that forms circles- it reminds me loosely of the idea of kissing circles.

* * * *

I just now noticed this by Lubos

I will try to see how he can say this is an error - I mean on first blush it looks to me quite reasonable for number systems- I mean, we come up with these shifts between the decimals or even without shifts we have patterns of the same numbers over different say decimal places. I thought Lubos put some stock into the inclusion of permutation ideas (that is maybe not for simple integers? Of course again how do we select from alternative places if not a constraint and ordering in reaction to this mode of thinking? Is it only valid say in the continuous then as in the idea of zeta functions, e to the i pi and all that? After awhile the phi pattern repeats with so many zeros after it as does of course the factorials- what some do not see here as in my abstract motion page is the value in a closed and complimentary system (which such systems are most of physics or well loved by them) of the preceding zeros of coordinates to those containing unit places. Now, we shift the dimensions and space- so as to derive by as a theorem the axiom that two planes can intersect in a point. Also extend the abstract quasic motions to other ideas of unfilled vacua and unrecognized velocities by some particles and of course the ten dimensions (not the least a sort of proof given null and abstract higher motions we should be dealing with 8 dimensions where the yang manifolds think there is a closure and unity at six. No doubt combinations and specific counting numbers and sets of things are important here. We can limit the spectrum discretely by some integer or we can imagine what it is like to generalize the dimensions of the discreteness. Can string and brane theory get along without such ideas?

* * * * *

The Prime Rodeo

2012-01-16T11:49:00.002-06:00

The Prime Rodeo L. Edgar Otto January 16, 2012

Well, Green Bay did not play well. I was sort of paying half attention and had a premonition the day before... the gods do not always hear Tebow prayers or victory dances after the touchdown. And the San Fran game and last few games were rather record breaking. Now the long sabbatical for the cheese-heads. The old meTV nostalgia channel is on but after awhile old shows, even the Noir genre, just cannot be as exciting as it was in the past. Time is for a lot of people a measure that just goes on and they are equal to it- nothing to waste while the waiting, no disappointments or expectations, no great disruption in the climate of their times. I guess the argument is more that we perceive things more than influence them in these matters of how we feel the most creative in what correct universe. All this of course can be radically changed- but it takes a lot and is very rare- that place where we acknowledge the millions of years to get to the sit coms as if evolution gives us the lottery new born to which we try to pile on this awareness again of a new lottery while the living beyond lightning striking us twice.

On thought that I decided to convey as a comment to Pitkanen last night: The philosophical question is- what do we mean by wasting time?

" People like us...know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion."
- Albert Einstein

Matti,

How much of other physics values can be like this concept? Chirality? Charge? Space and Mass? Gravity?

What is time that we can be said to waste it with knots and braiding theory or waste it doing endless diagonalization of matrices? (or we open the oyster to find the pearl through the p-adic, adelic ,cracks?

If we go deep enough into the depths will we at last find a stable world encompassing everything explaining all variations and anomalies? Do we want this for our grounding that our consciousness is a screen of bare charges made of shifting sand?

hammed, quantum theory cannot yet explain why separate sheets take charges or how tape pulled apart emits x-rays... or how bits of ice build up lightening. How might such things fit in the TGD framework?

The PeSla who had nothing to post today but wondering about someone a few years ago in the science chat rooms who once looked at quasics and said "I hope your are not just wasting your time diagonalizing matrices."

Also Kea answered my comment with this informative local lore and observations (I posted the video on facebook and some people liked such videos.

KeaJan 15, 2012 03:51 PM

The Pe Sla,

they are even more fun in their natural habitat. Alas, their numbers are in rapid decline, due to introduced predators and other human influences. I think they just would escape extinction, through adaption, if it weren't for the fact that some fuckwits still poach them. Not for money (their carcasses are worthless) but out of sheer spite (most moronic urbanites don't like being outwitted by a bird, and they have some bizarre notion that the kea should respect human property laws - like we respected theirs?).

But I remember the days when gangs of teenage kea would haunt all the main climbing huts/camps. They certainly know how to open and close bolt latches, so hut doors had to be fitted with heavy iron bars. Apparently they once locked two climbers in a hut by bolting the door on the outside. I am sure it was deliberate. And my favourite: at French Ridge we would always warn the foreigners to keep their boots inside (rather than dry them on the deck) so they only had themselves to blame when the kea dragged a boot to the 1000m drop near the hut. You would enjoy the 'keeeawww' cry of amusement as they watched it drop off.

* * * *
The illustration for this post shows a lady riding the bronco (as all theories are the stud of Alexander, youth to be tamed, and even might kick my quasic ass) she is roping in a universe of sorts with a rope made of her braided hair. Now there is the forumula for the Catalan numbers (associated with the associahedra and the sort of thing one might think related to p-adic even and odd factorials and so on. But I am not sure how well I understand all of this ultimately... still, how can one side of the issue see the other as a waste of time? Both or none or all of us wasting time? Yet they seem to agree on that such a level of topologies and arithmetic can find the masses of particles- In the center is Ulams map of primes of which I use the golden section to five levels as if to mimic the quasic grid.

It is a slow day I guess- sometimes it is all for the arts sake. I sleep late lately in the return of winter, grow too fat, and like the parrots sometimes have to find clay to eat to take out the toxins from what they have to digest.

I am open to suggestions for new areas to research and I forgot for yesterdays post for a video the second high school experiment was an oil sphere in alcohol and water, mixed to be sorted out with what looks like a ring of Saturn from the chaos.
But oil and water flow models are just too simple- the gyroscopes in all directions to try to figure out where things turn in four space certainly teaches us a lot about how we see the upward direction and truly must understand momentum. I may not post but I did not want to stop in what may appear a non-objective argument. It is most obvious our world in not yet mature enough to be safe for enquiry- and that goes for the mixed feelings Lubos and I have for those who work on the particle frontiers of any people.

* * * * *

Influences

2012-01-15T14:53:00.010-06:00

Influences & Childhood Thought Experiments L. Edgar Otto January 15, 2012

My thoughts turned to the influences of my constant observation and experimenting as a child- this looked at with retrospect. Kea parrots on the You Tube video of yesterday blew me away metaphorically- see Kea at work. One scene in particular was the parrot (I only realized these were parrots yesterday) that could turn the solenoid or helix to get to the hidden goodies inside. The video asks if that is instinct or intelligence- in such things I would add, rather classically, that it is also a matter of "intuition."

I include a list of almost titles which can account for experiments of thought in childhood- again in retrospect, hopefully of universal experiences and emotions or that of the golden age of national science at the beginning of the cold war. I begin to see where very young my mind turned to things like geometry and combinations and higher space- for the experiment not mentioned here in the chemistry lab was of Methane that seemed to add weight if the closed apparatus became exposed to the sunlight- the teachers dismissed the data but I kept imagining the molecules as the five points of a fourth dimensional configuration. All these titles relate to some such event early on. I am particularly interested in how our human development may relate to space and perhaps the media of the times we are in as some explanation for things like autism... I may make a book of this- the subjects touched on from time to time, especially in my lost poems.

One thing, in those poems, in the SphereDream godhead of 5 it became 8 with the mirrors, the so called quabics, but I did not know at the time this metaphor related to symmetry breaking in general physics. Metaphors solve some of physics too.

* * * * *

Ghost Factorials

2012-01-14T14:40:00.005-06:00

Ghost Factorials L. Edgar Otto January 14, 2012

The quantum explanation for why there are three dimensions as if that a deep explanation of how physical particles behave in relation to dimension itself can be generalized over the structures involved to make a new representation and configuration of possible abstract quasic motions and rest- it is this sort of thing that not only suggests the idea of nuclei but that things happen or move intelligible and concretely within them. But it is not enough as Rowlands does to contrast the nipotent and indempotent- but that of unity prime and privileged in directions in itself so justified by the duality that underlies discreteness- that in a deep sense nature does not rationalize her fractions even when in all the parameters involved we call physics these are seen to have an inverse so are reduced to simple plane models and twists of so many degrees.

In the illustration I also include the break down of the 27 elements of the hypercube into three 3by3by3 cubes, the center one representing the next level of quasic motions and from this found the symmetries to rearrange sukodu permutations.
This in the ghost factorial page (I mean some lattices that are between others needs not be quasi-xtalline) is a generalization with essential and not reduced or rationalized spaces- after all the Feymann diagrams are generalized already in the idea of the quasic matrix which goes beyond the Lagraginan or H operator formulism in the philosophy underlying qm theory- we note also that this of course relates to the deep concerns on the nature of dimensionless constants and those generalized in a wider concept of space also.

* * *

I posted to Pitkanen as some of his quantum terms in relation to what is long standing now within those terms and on my paper labeled ? in script for ghost factorials the following suggestions... How is it we imagine generations of particles that involve inverses of 2^n powers... 1/4 that for sure in mass calculations. Of course all the squaring of things is involved too in the measures.

So, Matti,

You insist on quantum descriptions- but what then is original beyond Dirac's four spinors- I mean something is generalized is these work (but only so well for these decades since him) as your last post that wants to make sense out of four waves... this four or five fold pattern in nature (recall Einstein tried 5 dimensions for one rather cylindrical unified field.)

And these can be reduced to 2+1 formulism from the 3+1, much like Feymann diagram so reduced and see as a general matrix to be expanded again into your 2x2 view (a debate of exclusion.) Now, in the quantum formulation we have different ways to view things that amount to almost the same thing- in its way it explains why we wind up with three dimensional space and two types of particles.

Mass in not in the equations- that is what some are looking for as well the nature of gravity. To base things on mass-less is merely to interpret Dirac's "nilpotent" algebra rather than "idempotent" forms of models.

If you cut a knot, as if a string, does it have more than 2 end points- if twistors are only complex duplications and numbers so to justify the 2 or 4 formulisms (of which in one form Dirac uses five...) it is not enough, qm mechanics is not enough.

Now, the Mersenne's as you use them may be enough but that is a wide field to explore- but it is to me an original approach.

I understand someone independent of the academia being creative and free to read and speculate- but I see no reason to make a great deal over idols of the day like Arkani-Hamed which all the bloggers seems to have done even when in disagreement. His is another near idea along the way like some of Hawking's.

There are other ways to explain quantization than that from Dirac in that differences in space and time and matter and charge are those of that great foundational difference between the continuous and the discontinuous in the search for some measure.

Maybe the old Egyptians had it right- we should not always rationalize our fractions- we simplify but lose information- and the lost information is not clearly lost- nor does it prove anything.

The PeSla

* * * *

Associated Associahedra

2012-01-13T10:57:00.006-06:00

Associated Associahedra L. Edgar Otto January 13, 2012 This is a paper on general applications of concepts which leads to things more properly matters of psychology and sociology- that is to speak in a hyper-language not based on our very deep fundamentals and questions of existence- but is not physic in its own way such a language?

First illustration added for color- small icons are 80x80 originally in this 1280 x 640 panel.

For awhile numbers started doing strange things so I had nothing more to post today as the calculations were confusing and mixed up. It is possible something is wrong with my small calculator (it occurs to me it is my roommates calculator and he dropped out of physics to become an artist). The exponential button does not work and
sometimes some programs run in the background. But I am sure I pressed the right buttons. Still, from the language for cognition theory and genetic predispositions the posts of yesterday certainly might apply to how we organize our brains for learning and become "hopeful monsters" who may not know they are victims of the patterns of dust within, or for that matter they are part monsters. Again, can knowing things help clear up (my roommates mood changes and diagnosis and effects of external chemicals?) or at least can we intervene as to what is lacking or needs to be done for the cognitive development of perception for our ever more autistic and addicted society? This sort of epistemology in the ideas of sukodu permutations of yesterday's post certainly applies to our grounding of physics which at times seems to get downright vaguely diagnosed as schizophrenic. A post to

Lubos,

Maybe that is not off topic, I mean remember the good old days when Omega minus made sense of the "particle zoo". Well, Lubos, your post has taken the

zoo to a whole new level. It just may be that nature has eternal forms things evolve to "inevitibly" from the nothingness. I mean, in the fine eyes of deep theoreticians

that is the correct way a giraffe is to be drawn when all our eyes clear up from some level of the fuzziness.

The PeSla

So, I notice that some things appear strange to me about factorials. That in the straightforward calculations of things like the group number of rigid rotations and inversions of orthogons, that two and five as ten can see them as (with mathematical induction or recursive concepts) as if a deeper program is running in the background.
The simple formulas in number theory may not be as simple after all. For example twice 384 times 5 = 3840. 2^4 x 4! times 10. But in general this role of 5, as I might expect from a hierarchy of repeating quasic patterns over integers, carries over to 2^n x n! in some ways. Now what happens if we solve the function like things for 5 to sort of inverse the idea of phi in the continuum- that is replace in phi the square root of 5 by such a function? This I need to look at again when my head is not confused at some frontier that may tell me (or other theoreticians like Pitkanen) what is wrong with my thinking or theory. His related to five too in the useful observation that of five things like axes when we allow a certain influence of concavity in the space +++-- divides the sequence or permutations of the axes into two sets +++ and -- which on this side of "an opaque mirror symbol ? as in 2^n x n? or better .V. for a symbol that does not connect +++++ to the density of the fivefold-ness that is 12345 and 13524 but 135 42 of which this to me has application in the stable construction of five sticks supporting each other in a crossing over for a pentagram.

This rather Omnitwistor level of ideas may also organize us (3+2)^n into false perceptions at the reversal of the Dark Mirror plane treating the whole as if a unity or a connection of isolated regions of ambiguity. Such a sukodu disconnect in mind and numbers as integrations evaluate and integrate for coherence's and seem to me one of the surreal properties of numbers where looking at the disconnects inside us or in the universe we have not distinguished the dark or reflective mirror planes. This is not to say some partial ideas are wrong, just rather not complete a theory.

An irreducible particle is a polytope (of iotas, point-rays string like) then in the abstract sense a lattice of such particles of so many types may be xtalline and intelligible in numbers including the count of holes. (see Conways link in my post yesterday linking to Kea on his new octahedra). Such lattices within a sufficient complexity convert convex and concave in some non-Euclidean sense of space regions.

If the Associhedra are one to a dimension, and these can be generalized (Grassman? I must look this up) then in a wider inter-dimensional and group world these have to be associated to some code context with the usual simple multiplication of groups- and yes as in the comments today the number 14 shows as in the hypercube as a rhombidodecahedral projection ... hmmmm of two types one more a phi diamond shadow.) In a sense these sort of asymmetric permutation directed polyhedra project through motion as well as rest to define what is irreducible as particles and the resulting nature of them in regard to some context of supersymmetries (superparticles as a coherent reality or not.)

One stray thought from all this is that we can also organize higher spaces as 3^n, that is there are also n-D analogs to the sukodu cubes that can remain distinct from other considerations of how such spaces are divided into permutations of isolated regions that may or may not correspond totally in the sequences in the flesh. I mean, we agreed that some of this world was half of nine dimensional or 4.5 D when trying to figure out the meaning (and we can justify dividing by group numbers and other powers like 27 across associated spaces) or as the numbers play tricks again until I find my unity of new conceptual challenges- 7/9 is trivially also 81/14. And of course 7 + 9 = 15.

Now in many ways of the counting of these various spaces of elements found in or not in such matrices, the value ratio comes out many places around 8-fold and this intelligibly meshes with our current speculations on the weights of dark matter etc.

Let us praise the leaders with a new fad of an idea- or let us not- if their theories are not even incomplete...

* * * * *

Exotic Particle Permutation N-Sukodu Matrices

2012-01-12T09:58:00.014-06:00

Exotic Particle Permutation N-Sukodu Matrices L. Edgar Otto January 12, 2012

I include here some stray informal notes, and some very formal awakenings, a little philosophy of science, and two poems inspired by the radio interview for a new book of anthropology called Jubilee- that and a girl I met with her boyfriend, a new freshman, in the quad of UNC. I include the quasic method of permutations as I have gone on to the harder problem of more general relations between permutation sets and its application to particles or organic systems.

If we think of a Sukodu game as a sort of matrix in so many natural dimensions we can imagine combining different ones (I assume a series of the odd numbers but a 4 by 4 one is possible with the modifications of such factoring involved), then the series rising of the permutations of a given Sudoku set and another can combine as if part of the main diagonal of such a matrix. Thus, in the algorithms between such sets each can be permuted separately then this is a higher number of possibilities when these exchanges of rows and columns are applied intelligibly.

A main result here is a better understanding of what we mean by decoherence when physical things, even as probabilities, energies and lifetimes bond in combination's.
That they can also have an intelligible ground for not bonding, and that the problem remains I call Teleoscoping of the information of unique binary interactions on a deeper level of systems- perhaps, the idea of numbers as genders and the inter-dimensional aspects of permutations over the Sukodu groups here apply. It seems this attitude toward the use of numbers as if an awakening applies to their generalization of them to basic algebraic forms as well- perhaps the Jubilee here between the social and individual years, the 8 tenths of my substance, is that I did not see this right away after all this time- that numbers can be alive and valuable and our elementary textbooks do not tell us but merely suggest a student gets this somewhere between the computations and the art form- art as a proof of sorts. The teleoscoping problem is a key one for organic information systems. I also introduce the term imgeneration to distinguish it better from generation as understood in standard theory- but keep in mind the ambiguity (which of course can be useful with subconscious or deep mathematical connections).

In a new theory it is hard to distinguish an original and significant contribution from a mathematically sound but trivial and reduced concept. This is a counter to the idea of falsification as self-verification ultimately (also the teleoscoping problem), but a permutation context isolates and loops to nearly intelligible connected systems in the idea of quasi-entropic fields. Thus, doubt and faith can be independent of the content and perceptions in consciousness.

The following poems (not sure where to put them on line really) are rather hard subjects to consider but seem as timely as the state of human kind. The town and gown idea and our expectations interrupted by the apparent need for the military and it related to debt in society where either the village or the soldiers once cannon fodder remain so- only the few are lucky enough to have a world safe for enquiry. This interesting book Jubilee, was written to support ideas of credit (for the jubilee was the general forgiveness of debts- a sort of pot luck redistribution of wealth, by someone for the Occupation movement). I am neutral on this politics for now, but the idea of how we pay our soldiers so they with gold can buy food rather than rape and plunder is an interesting theory of the arising of money over barter. Also, it is the stuff of debate in ancient Greece when the troops come home as a matter of philosophy- or when the sailors are paid by the Queen for the armada long after most of them have faded away.

* * * * *

I also pick a rather disturbing moral subject for the next poem from the news and imagine the defense of our marines for their offensive act as if only thought so by those who give lip service to the issue for what is generally the value in the community (that fears the veteran returning home and debates if they are responsible for their acts so pay them with mental health programs even if the circumstances have shown they have been out of ammunition for their own sovereign free will or they socially say so (who else can read the state of mind of someone disabled?) Provided of course, they seen as a danger (or not truly seen in serious cases) as a danger to themselves and others. Note also that Taliban means student.

* * * *

Jubilee L. Edgar Otto Jan. 11, 2012

I am in the hour, Blondie, where we sat in the quad
your leaving home & rite to "go to college"
Write a novel called Jubilee as Southern as mint-julip
your lip's first bite of Moon Pie and Pepsi Cola
His long blond strands & hippie headband there
with you at the apex of eternal high school sweethearts
Not so far from cuddle kisses save the show for others to think

A little Boon's Farm Strawberry Wine, homecoming,
Farm Straw we joked your middle name in the frenzy
Caught up in the victory game, a pearl at hog night
passed around the gauntlet of the frat boys
Will be boys a dozen times your sacrificed virginity

He left you and you cried to me "I'm dropping out" by the
Bus stop back to home- I said "All debts are still paid back come Jubilee."

* * *

On the Desecration of Graves L. Edgar Otto Jan. 12. 2012

In the occupied village students turned soldiers
& those in the way of the hunt, blood brothers shared, spilt, spit on the ground
The uniforms are not paid enough nor do they seek
to rob the graves, nor think of college and girls back home
So they give, half for mature civilization

Their genitals in toxic inevitable release
trained dogs retrieving the winged ones for their masters
Desist! the courts proclaim without erections
some forensic science to find the missing, sort the ramparts
For what closure save publicly if survivors care
which the gentile, which the barbarians forgotten?

Half the final prayers in superstition to shoot beyond the grave
even those now banished, as they are seeded with revenge their
May as well have never been- as do the mountain tribes at war commune.
make love to the mound & mass-less grave of cannibal sacrifice
Marking the trail & territory, documented evidence for the
gods and world to see, a force that we be free a
Future world for enquiry safe, now anthropology
indifferent to the holy truths

Symbolic only the ferriers domesticating the wild & lucky horseshoes
knotted to breaking, collapsing & condensing world & the other chapters,
Act, brothers of one book beneath their acid rain

Truths holding close their own flags &
Sacred books that can never touch the ground...

* * * * * *

Two comments, for Kea and for Louise Riofrio:
Kea,

One of my favorite space fillers as a simi-regular tesselation (for storage containers and with 1/4 of a tetrahedron added.

I like your link to Conway involving octahedra although many many concave structures are possible.

These shapes, even the polytopes, should be seen from a higher dimensional view rather than that hidden by our usual 3d traditions and classifications. The complexity of shapes so reduced hide the deep significance and in a way when we have simplified algebra, things done in relation to one dimensional curves in a plane- the deep significance is also hidden. I do not know which is easier or how much of that now known in mathematics still hidden from my view in the exquisite detail of the beauty.

In a wider sense, in the structure that underlies planes... the tetrahedron is a space filler if we consider all permutations and dimensions- by this I do not simply mean the 4 triangle solid nor its group coordinates.

The PeSla Some still think this way to view symmetry is not that important.

* **
Hi,

I find it most interesting that the quasi-xtals were found in space- why? I mean, the golden ratio is involved and perhaps these form not from say pressure and heat and the like but as in the gamma ray creation by composite galaxies something much deeper around centered singularities (black holes) such as yours in some general fundamental space configuration.

The PeSla

* * * * *

The Arithmetic Topology of Ink Drops in Water

2012-01-11T12:08:00.005-06:00

The Arithmetic Topology of Ink Drops in Water L. Edgar Otto January 11, 2012

The stacking of cube units as in Soma or n-onimos, something I played with on intuitive principles comes back to apply to this most difficult problem of analogs to the Sukodu games in higher spaces. I feel that in the miraculous way systems can fit together intelligibly and we understand the count I have reached my limit of abilities even sleeping over it. Yet, this is a problem of how systems age once they have had an initial condition of birth. Is it not miraculous how the systems of the body fit together, one could feel the awe of some intelligent design at work here- or one could in the understanding of evolving systems feel forlorn for the gods long sent into blindness past twilight. But today I feel a little stronger, slower and with subjects that when surveyed seems like children's distractions that only hint of the wider world to learn.

So for what it is worth I give you these familiar metaphors, the topology of the ink drop in water (I may put a video up of this or you may try it yourself) in the natural game of High Rise- our fitting together things that solve actual entities that fit together such as body chemistry. High rise was what a lady called her method at the lunch room of the University of Milwaukee whom I would present my latest cube puzzle and she would rapidly solve it, not my trial and error relaxed methods nor unproven intuitive principles. As I said, crossword games and zillion piece puzzles bore me. Another lady could put the 30 cube labels, like CHL into the proper alphabetical order rapidly when my methods of counting were laboriously slow before the fact of organizing principles. In particular their separation into dimensional sets of 6 and 9. Yet, making a set of dice for me she did not realize that there were 30 cubes (which of course may not match as to which 15 set is positive in its axial directions). Women have abilities of a difference of intuition to which men see theirs as mystery but we owe a lot of higher dimensional vision to such women who, like Alicia Boole, saw things the experts could not.

Thus I only have one thing to post today really, I call it the issue of gender (which of course in integers is when enters the number three to the mix with duality). I give you the debate of the day for we all seem to be caught in the cultures of this gender dominance war which is in the final analysis the very problem we are struggling with in our physical models. If woman, the most profound definition of God, stands between men and God- the Mother or Matrix- can she not so stand between man and the dreams of physics- on the other side of the mirror is woman as experiment. Only in bad faith can we make hypotheses and hold to them without clinging to woman as our experiments. For example:

A fellow blogger reports this news Here now we can imagine and have even looked for such things and it can lead us to a deep and obvious sense these exist but can we say they really are exotic before the fact? How far can we trust our intuitions? How far can men and women trust each other in the first place although each drawn to the exotic where one ideal is shared by halves or the world between them is doubled?

So, within the debate experiment or not, we have the simple formalism of the 3+1 variety and the 2+2 variety but is there really a choice between them. In the first situation (Sukodu-like or like the water as a background in analogs of power in Pascal triangular arrays - note I keep the Euclidean here as a ground but it is not clear that other relations than say the faces of cubes or the extent of the axes differences is not intelligible in the totality, it seems so, that is it does not appear non-linear unless one thinks of a plane as non-linear in principle- the eight armed octopus can fill the water with obscuring ink that eventually dissipates over time, and it is hard because my quasics as a simplification is hard on a more complicated level with the same difficulty in drawing structures in higher space. This sort of hard thinking has to become hard work rather than natural dreaming- for one thing we are not always aware of our state of health or lack of energy for some simple physical and perhaps mental reason that becomes clear sometimes if we awaken and even transcend later as light slows down in our minds and bodies.

Since I am on this ancient idea of gender (and now the next level of integers of the 4 and 5 (quarks) I present to you a rather simple plane array I call the "unisex brane matrix" or when moved on into wider systems in stealth and flamboyance, perhaps the term "metrosex system" but of course gender here is much a metaphor even in our poetic search for unique words. A metrosex is the bonding socially of entities in a sterile desert environment of concrete or the web that never sleeps.

There are some problems in the quasic topology too as far as what can intelligibly exist in a city of irreducible bonds and systems, the system of systems as the absorber and creator of calling forth that that is and that hidden. Fermion Paul Exclusion as partially filled discrete Rowlands principle of metaphysics, again and perhaps why nature has these types of statistics in the first place. For in the next or purely four space level the analog to Sudoku would fill half the space in the sense that the round things and box things are the same volume in 8 space. This can be a point of confusion, including how we may justify complex space duplications as methods and models- or as Pitkanen also realizes- an intuition into what we describe as bioctonion for the higher space problem not the same concept as the doubling of other systems of space beyond the restrains on lower dimensions.

Recall that I say 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 - 2 = 0 , deep yes? but 2 here is two dimensional and 4 is seen as four dimensional. Thus the first axiom says that two planes can intersect into a point. Also, 3 + 1 = 4, In that more masculine so to speak formulism and less dream world symmetrical of woman entering the ocean of symmetry in the ecstasy of her losing sense of self at the ground of creation. For it is that a line can intersect a volume at one 0 point inside. So the crude simple way to see such "dimensionally colored integers" so soon enters number three, is the Unisex Matrix which I will illustrate above in the accompanying graphic and photo.

In a unified super-symmetry theory obviously (2+2)^n x (3 + 1)^n = 16.

I have new graph paper printed out and may look again at the representations from a slightly higher space grid. Meanwhile enjoy the topological magical numerology (you do it anyway between the vast continuous functions, at leas for particle measures). In terms of the tetracubes (four cubes face joined as in the Soma game and presumably represent say the group nodes of a tetrahedron) we have the 3+1 type and the 2+2 type not just which are three dimensional standing alone as a structure) and it magically adds things up when fit together, for we can take the 2+2 forms and make half the next space of 2^6 into 32 of the eight possible tetracubes (and of course shadow double it). or we can see that with the two tricubes the 24 cubes of the Soma system add up to 27 or thirty to fill the cube- the 1 by 4 tetracube to be interpreted as a 2+2 system but this ambiguity exists when we reduce dimensions down to only a one dimensional view anyway.

* * * * *

FOOTNOTE: In the illustration I left out the 8 in 3064 = 8x (2^5)5! - 1 , the four space rotations and inversions and the 5 space inversions and rotations come up here.

Lexicographic Stringy Trivial Sudoku Triality

2012-01-10T13:08:00.009-06:00

Lexicographic Stringy Trivial Sudoku Triality L. Edgar Otto Jan. 10, 2012

You would think that the idea as in the names of numbers is rather constant- but numbers have shifted a lot for me from being uncertain things to living things, boring things, and ultimately mysterious things. It occurred to me to read the Sudoku sets of three numbers as if a literal decimal number. For example 153 does not matter if we shift the digits and take the cube and sum, we get 153. This reminds me of the first nuclear idea of strings of which it could not be determined which of three quarks were in the center of a string segment of two quark ends.

The same thing applies to our averaging or mixing say the masses of some particles over their generations and all such phase averaging or mixing ideas. The triviality then is the asymmetry involved in the values to be (quasically) explained. Of course such asymmetry is most likely fundamental in nature if not ultimately so.

Well, whatever my sense of integer numbers they danced around a bit as I thought about them- and I chose to use the calculator for a sense of accurate accounting. Thus the permutations of these Sudoku games in a row of cells of them 3x3 summed to 4995.

Now there may be properties of numbers and formulas of which I am not aware making my education in them rather naive (what is casting out nines?) but in this dancing some rather interesting numbers and numerology came out usually involving group theory values- (years ago in the search for those with theories like mine which may have shown me I am just reinventing the wheel and a rather stone one to ride on at that- I only saw Clifford's algebra as close to my system- but alas in a different way as to how I understood dimension and what is finite or not.) One thing for sure these Sukodu concepts in the low dimensions (composite theory again- and after all 10 is a composite number) helps by the nonagon diagram of division above explain why in such systems of space taken literally some asymmetry and discreteness can arise.

4995-1152 =3840 + 3 = 32 x 120 +3 ; 6^3 = 216, 216^2 = 12^3 x 3^3 = 46656 ;
405 = 45 (the sum of 1 to 9) x 111 (7 in binary), and 111 = 3 x 37; 4559 /4 x 1152 = 384 +3; 27 x 192 eventually reduces to 10; The factors 5 x 27 x 37 as 2^5D times 3
expands to (3 x 5)x(3^4)x (3 x 37) = 2^8D. (9^3)^3 = 19683^2... In a sense the divisions and permutations here involve at least elliptic space curve equivalents.

I also looked to find higher analogs for the Sukodu but had little luck or time, things like 5 by 5 ones (looking on google I see only 4 by 4 ones and some other unusual ones considered but not 5 by 5 or any other odd number considerations. Of course 5 x 81 is 405.

Sudoku has a vast internet literature and some interesting papers that use it. But for me the odd numbers I intuit as important in these permutations, 7 applies to three space, the diatonic scale, and 9 to four space (we imagine the natural dimension as doubled and add one, thus 15 natural dimensions would have 31 lexicographic numbers in its parallels of planes and lines etc... These moreover are knight functions and do relate to the idea of the Greaco-latin squares and thus the restrictions of such freedom in the lower dimensions- or if you will the global restrictions of the so called primacy of string theory. (So Lubos we stand again as Godel and Cohen- but take this as humorous in the spirit you posted on this- with our roles perhaps reversed, that we cannot prove or disprove string theory either! for now anyway just as with the continuum hypothesis in its variations.)

Interestingly, Lubos motl's programmed sudoku example (and we can find very many done by brute force to exhaustion by the computers by algorithms on line I saw some of them today) appears close to the top of google image search, in top ten or so in relation to minimum hint solutions. (I should look at this too for it may be even lower I sense by other methods, after all seeing from four space is more powerful) But in matters of Clifford algebra in a search for the same things listed as searched for topics on this blog that found me, I am not on the first page of the gods, some of the hopeful and suffering god, of theory, but the second page where perhaps I am most everywhere- a matter I suspect of the terminology or some human judgement as to the relevance of my topics. Yes, the gods of theory live high up on the food chain from the working physicists and students- they control the lightning so approach them with respect and caution. Laugh only at their came to late but publish or perish papers. It may be just a matter of prestige for China to reach the moon- but at least they are doing something that will give the world benefits- at least they are doing something.

So, as Lubos says, Sudoku was invented in the Czech republic by the king and taken up by the Japanese- I am trying to show why the matrix I posted yesterday was closely related to the one he gave (considering all permutations and sub-permutations) but I am not posting the method explicitly although the clues are certainly here, without some formal dialog. Let us hope the town and gown poets and gods are not wasting each others and their own time when there is much to be done!

It is clear also that my recreations with n-ominos and the 15 cubes of 6 colors prepared me for some rapid understanding of what can be done with a freer definition of space and numbers. But I had no idea it was relevant to physics at the time or it was such a very hard problem before the fact. For economic reasons my technology has been the paper and pen- somewhere along the way Conway and I parted company on the use of computers over physical models- each has advantages and now I feel we are pretty much talking about the same thing and methods when it comes to unified physics.

Last night after posting I watched a taxi-driver poet soon to teach at the tech here work his Sukodu in the newspaper and he answered several questions including as to why the game fascinated him- but I also watch him play his crosswords. Such games, like the classical puzzle of many parts and the same shape I tend to find rather excessively boring. If that means anything.
* * *
This an interesting arrangement. Note that the number of cells in this array is 153. from Daniel here

* * *
I should add for those of you enamored of the number 160 in the theoretical particle physics world... if we see this interesting configuration, with four fold wings, there are five more cells of 9 numbers between them... in this respect we add another 9 doubled or superimposed in the center for a total of 153 + 9 for 162 which of course is a doubling of all the cells in the triality sense that it = 2x 81.

I can hardly wait to take this game to the next level to see what is there in the doubling and higher generations of the irreducible's and field expansions so to speak. I hope others share my enthusiasm. of the four sets of 9 cells of 9 this adds to 108 which many have computed to be the rotations of the hypercube counting from reflections from a corner- but is it not half of 6^3? For me there is still a little more possible than the composite concepts of particles, I hope, worth exploring. But is this not somehow a unity of groups involving sums of cubes and the unexpected patterns that share symmetry and asymmetry on generational levels?
But Kea said we need to find the lower trialities first... and thank you Lubos for the link and predicted values of such particles. Certainly I see that our views of supersymmetry may have to be reconciled for a deeper understanding of number and nature.

* * * * *

The Other Unique Sudoku Solution of Lubos Motil

2012-01-09T22:17:00.003-06:00

The Other Unique Sudoku Solution of Lubos Motil L. Edgar Otto Jan. 09, 2012

Given all the wrong and not even wrong permutations (at least in lower space) in this deep problem really of triality or even 4 and 5-ality and beyond, it may not be obvious from a global shift of the elements to see this a sort of mirror to the one given by Lubos here. In this symmetrical space we can envision properties of reductions by numbers for particles in intelligible composite ways we have not yet imagined. This is the world of my singularities, and Kea's intuition of mirrors and half particles, of the effects of Louise for structures, and of Pitkanen's desire for a higher application on even the biological scales for higher dynamics.

And I derived it by hand, without the aid of computers or calculators.

* * *

Doubly Intelligible Doubly Intuitive Number Space

2012-01-09T10:34:00.009-06:00

Doubly Intelligible Doubly Intuitive Number Space L. Edgar Otto Jan. 09, 2012

There is a lot of imagination, especially for some "Sacred Geometers" who intuitively look back to lost tribes and civilizations for lost knowledge and agree that changes are coming between the dark ages. The power of Sirius as the North star of Aegypt and its magic of the Philosopher's stones and frequencies of the pyramids- and a time perhaps when we reach again these ancient disconnects evidenced in universal symbols (multi-versal really) of higher realms of space and number- when? perhaps sooner than we now think, but one thing I feel god fer sure is that what we not embark upon will far surpass anything from our past. For now only art can trump the progress and evaluation of science. So I add its purity in the first illustration as a lady in the coffee shop freely does her art at the chess table with no presumptions in mind- striking me as genes and particles. While longing may make things out of reach and be obscured we strive for exploration of the down to earth touching that can bring us back to our visions of light.

Nothing yesterday, but a few stray thoughts put doubly randomly on a mind map whiteboard, doubly confusing as to the time and thoughts, numbers of yesterday so simple and alive to move and know why, but today they add an air of mystery. So on some whim I looked at 153. This area I thought too far from physics, that I would only achieve entertainment in the deep speculation... As far as particle physics was concerned it comes close to "crazy gluons" if we are to tie things together on some ultimate statistical level. These ambiguous creatures are step higher than the more scientific sounding concepts of "super duper- or super-gluons."

Nevertheless, I come here and see Lubos discussing what I have done- I think in a similar manner, on composite ideas in general and physical theory. In the craziness of such spaces who is to say which one is more speculative and crazy? Something can be thought of in the dynamics of differences in our models as perhaps in between. But I should slice through all this eventually by the sharp sword of binary information lest I forget for we rely a little less on raw intuition there.

If there is a world where nature herself does not know what is there of intuitions or physical realities of some system or entity, how can we use this ultimate place of singularities and field spaces only one way for what we fancy it implies? To say that the higher center in higher space in the Sudoku matrix is evidence we can say beyond the science as a craziness for global warming on this level of theory and the ultimate level of necessity can be applied to hint at the very opposite of conclusions. So for now, as in the idea the consciousness can change the physical matter (few know btw that Woman can be seen as the elemental changes of things as well as the womb of matrices- in this she can be as fickle as man) or that such an interpretation of the quantum world is bogus- this says the same thing for any interpretation of experiments or for that matter the reality of there results where the uncertainty is beyond these issues of quantum interpretations. Thus, the debate as to we being the agents of such global warming or we affected by cycles and seasons.

Now I give you two references for the number 153 (we presume that the Bible contains much number theory by the Greeks mainly of the day as well the idea of a still higher quabic singularity in a system a closed cycle- ultimately gravity like- as if the tent and flame in a spiraling recycling from the Hebrew tradition):

St. John 21

4 ¶ But when the morning was now come, Jesus stood on the shore; but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus.
5 Then Jesus saith unto them, Children, have ye any meat? They answered him, No.
6 And he said unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the ship, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes. Lk. 5.6
7 Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.
8 And the other disciples came in a little ship, (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes.
9 ¶ As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now caught.
11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, a hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.

And this wiki article by which I rediscovered some of the numerical properties of 153but learned of some I did not stumble upon last night thinking I just have to search out some of these concepts in the algebra in a very much more formal manner. My first intuitive whim was to compare it to the prime number 587 that came up in my explorations of yesterday when I imagine the symmetries of the 6x6x6 Sudoku matrix having a singularity. It would be 216 + 1 as an analogy to a hypersudoku of 257 as a center... 153 is of course the idea of 17 as such a center.

Now, the 6x6 influences of duality (and the thirty color cubes etc...) can be thought of as dominos of two squares in the 6x6 array in which the number 25 comes up again as the Higgs-like centeral singularity or initial coordinate pixel for extension or connections to other singularities in higher >4 spaces. We note that at 6x6 we cannot arrange them that there is no fault line separating them into two sets and this a property only of these numbers 2 with 6. (at least at first blush without further generalizations of concepts where such might emerge in the space). Yet we do not have six fault lines so to say the square is a unified region. Thus we have structurally 5 vertical and 5 horizontal fault lines we sort of vaguely can multiply (perhaps quabic number-wise).

Now, the interesting property of 153 is that if the digits are cubed (in any permutation) and added the result is 153. This is true of half of all numbers doing this that within 14 steps we resolve things down to 153 again... Thus the fishes are the maximum that can be held in the net without out its breaking in the Biblical metaphor (I saw some discussions on line in relation to the interpretations of this passage of which only a blind believer who does not really know what he believes would make the leap to conclusions into the I-can-fly hallucinations of the great drops between mountain tops or if they so fly the bungie cords in the fall of so called fellowship from their friend will not pull them back as they have broken down in the temptation to cast themselves off the mountain. Stop giving Creationism a bad name ye fanatics!).

Let us also take note that in biology 14 proteins or codons is about the right idea for the minimum encoding of certain hormones and viruses.

Of course we also note the 14's involved in the associahedron in the asymmetric directionality and so on.

I may post the pages of double doodling from yesterday but you have to put together the pictures over this very strange speculation. A key concept or metaphor I derived from this page is the idea related to the flatworm centrosome of which we imagine a level of meiosis and mitosis having certain independent levels of the dynamic hierarchy of things biological and physical. The centrosome a rather center singularity of space structure and number in which the key concept is that at such a 216 + 1 singularity we have an echo of the same structure (but it is not the structure of the nucleus there itself.) In the poem of last night I used this to describe the loss or bonding between people in the spiraling isolation awakened in their minds not really outside themselves when they perhaps feel the call for also following loved ones into the river as nature consumes itself on some level of isolated systems that may only connect beyond- this idea is ultimately a paradox for now but does explain some or organize some mental models better. This paradox also would have a view of gravity that paradoxically stands outside the standard idea of forces and their unification, ultimately.

Giving in to Meiosis L. Edgar Otto 01-09-12

Lost or moved along in the maze
once learned the way through love and grief
We feed on an others dreams and beliefs
in the labyrinth fickle hearts Minotaur crazed

Some then sacrifice themselves that gods do not forget
what they expected from their life script and bonds
Somewhere between the clone & spores, violin fronds
shadow echoes themselves reborn then again to split

The directors & actors act out their inner gnome
or in mortal loss strike out for colder snuggles
Or unique hearts bungled disappear into the cannibal jungle
to pass the loops of time, long, too soon, the herd and hippodrome

Flatworms spawn double head regeneration or upon themselves only
their centrosome egg soul sphere of isolation
Beyond expectations, beyond expectations without review of drama
before their eyes a life's panorama.

* * * * *

Kajsa Alexandria Hydrangea on facebook today quoted Eyedea (hip-hop artist) which seems to me to be relevant to my topic today... perhaps an alternative view.

"Involved with a species evolving so slowly
Genetically infantile, violent and holy
We think we're so smart but there's not much to know
Caveman is still alive behind those robot eyes
Fully controlled by ten thousand year old instincts
Hands on the war button, flinch and your world's extinct
This is technology for the barbarian
I see the future: the past, we'll be there again"

* * * * * Shades of Canticle for Leibowitz and all that!

I just looked at the PDF linked to Lubos above- still trying to adjust things to the experimental results of the LHC and 6D compactification models but it ends on this quote of which some of us has held this position a long while now:

"Although conventional supersymmetric models are being challenged by experiments and
naturalness at this point, this model raises the hope that models with more subtle composite dynamics could in fact be the correct theory of nature."

QED?

* * * *

Wildcard Topology and General Quabic Concepts

2012-01-08T17:28:00.009-06:00

Wildcard Topology and General Quabic Concepts
L. Edgar Otto January 8, 2012

In the dim light of the tele at night, watching reruns or some wild card football game, I did not feel I would have much to post (most of it said if one looks back already.) But, I jotted down a few things and hoped I pressed the right buttons on the calculator- it added up to a lot written in all directions like a free association on some whim or question, a mind map or perhaps a white board- otherwise I would not have written hints down. But it occurred to me, this informal scrap paper slowly developed into more formal concepts and made those deep connections between some models of my own so I thought I would include it for what it is worth.

If we are to color the parts of an orthogon with so many colors, the quasic grid shows how to distribute them over the types of subcells- these are fewer numbers in the combinatorial problem than we imagine now where such symmetry reduces the scope of the problem rather than rapidly increase the large numbers. I am sure some inspired numerology is in here somewhere and this time I keep track of the steps. 587 is a special prime number which in the lead illustration I used to come close to the ability to draw better on an array of pixels- something I intuitively toyed with earlier by just the drawing- and of course (Kea and Lubos reminded me of the interest in Sudoku) in fact, that we can divide 1280 by 640 into 80by80 pixels was useful in itself for spacing and drawing such as an array of avatars I posted on the philosophychatforum of that maximum accepted size- it of course if I chose the quasic grid sometimes as such an avatar it fit as a perfect hypercube.

So, these central real or virtual creative points that arise in higher dimensional figures- I once thought of them as outside the mundane and a place or thing that perhaps could hold the soul- if we could show it full- but for awhile now I know that we should get used to looking for such a thing in a much more general idea of geometry. Still, to imagine (and hope the values come out as well those of the twister and complex phase spaces) these abstract centers in things like Pascal triangle analogs and Sudoku games is in a sense the soul of our particle physics.

As far as Lubos analogy to global warming or in defense of string theory and so on, I understand the power of the underlying views and of what seems hidden as something of which we only imagine we can say about things we do not quite yet prove. A new theory will not undermine our speculations on quantum stuff not absolutely random as if we are the whiteboard or mind map of God, just transcend our centered world view.

Also, where I am doing other things (still finishing some of Zane Gray and watching the political debates and so on) I feel a little overwhelmed by the glorious new technology that will soon be upon us- perhaps in the results of chemistry more than in the physics. But once established (or we are lied to that some theory is complete without correcting the lies in an artistic manner) we cannot assume that a theory is finished- for these are born verified and born falsified in that they have a real reach and are like living creative things. So, philosophically, our relation to beauty above boredom once the concept is mastered is a lot of ongoing work we should not always take fore-granted- much like relationships or any human social bonding.

* * * * *

As this applies to the topic today I add this I posted on Kea's blog (not sure it will be in the way and clutter things up if she allows it there) On the other hand after these informal thoughts the insight and understatement I read today again stood out- so I stand by my evaluation of this theoreticians abilities. L. Otto...

Kea,

The thought crossed my mind recently that when it comes to something physical like particles, if not gravity, that these may be the only groups that make a difference. In the Galois conception that irreducible as representations is assumed a particle. How can anyone fail to see the significance of such concepts- especially when, as accurate as the standard theory is it has a long way to go to meet more foundational ideas of super-symmetry as the areas you mention here and results in an equally accurate yet seemingly simpler theory. Are there not 26 such groups? Their subgroups may apply too, then we can see what is useful beyond these- but of course I speak more from the finite group view.

The PeSla

* * * * *

Congruency Problem, Elliptic Curves, Galois Fields

2012-01-07T12:37:00.006-06:00

Congruency Problem, Elliptic Curves, Galois Fields ( and Wildcard Dynamics ) L. Edgar Otto January 06, 2012

Lubos just posted: here on Sudoku encouraging readers to prove it needs 17... but that is the 4 by 4 idea of lower dimension < 5 reducibility over 3^n triality field concepts so the proof at least involves the ideas of Surreal, Quasic, and prime number ideas at the foundations. Perhaps it is not quite this simple as other ideas can come up- why should there be the intuitionist and specific primes chosen for the 15 and 1 wildcard irreducible set of four space (of five points not seen as an intrinsic part of a string so no concrete reduction to branes as my "iotas". But did we not label the structure of a hypercube and elements into a sukodu array long ago? Lubos does seem to be headed on the right track too to lead or follow us alternative soothsayers. Now, 2^2n +1 hints or more in higher space if we take the Friomnium view of some real but hidden dimensions or connections? Sometimes when the lines or wormholes are parallel but do not meet- what a simple idea to question as not a theorem and yet beyond the simple questioning we find the more deeply relevant and profound. N-dimensional Sudoku anyone? Su257> Su4097 is that possible? and Ulla can we not at least in our imaginations of adding some unity to the experience and conception of the world not reasonably choose a holding term like supergravity that is not longer the ghostly gravity? To see this I briefly thought I could start again with totally new ideas and terms now that all the hints of physics have been arrayed in my mind.

* * * * *

The PeSla
Lubos,
very interesting.

From my view, not sure what are the equivalence classes for the dimensions involved or why your formulas have such high numbers, that this center piece is the center of the 81 elements of the hypercube. It of course would be the one in the next highest space.

It reminded me of the Big Bang singularity (or in a sense a half-singularity if that makes sense Smile

Space begins at four dimensions in our deeper understanding of it.

I enjoyed your personal commentary on your last post- I feel a look into a theoreticans mind is made much clearer by such autobiographical issues as well the passion in theories we so often teach as if it had no origin in passion.

So, what would the Sukodu game look like with 257 hints?

the Pe Sla

* * * * *

This should be relevant and interesting- light and charge on the pico scale? I think it will lead to some interesting technology when they develop it beyond line land.

Here, science daily... it vaguely suggests to me with the four waves a sort of first quasic slit experiment... metaphorically at least. But other such symmetries are there as in those of the red blood cells.

* * *

Quasi-faithful Wild-card Super-symmetry

2012-01-06T09:25:00.008-06:00

Quasi-faithful Wild-card Super-symmetry L. Edgar Otto Jan. 05, 2012

First Lubos has a great post today with some personal history of his mental development and reasons to defend the abstraction of quantum and string theory (of which the sensitive reviewer will see the same arguments can be applied with ambiguous results- for how simple can the math go or the physics then go no more as Einstein casually remarked it has a bottom to not be simplified further) Now, Lubos makes this distinction in his post here :

" * extensive progress: using the same rules and concepts but adding much more data, something that requires more brute power to evaluate
* intensive progress: one has to learn completely new concepts and meta-concepts, new relationships between them, new mathematical structures to describe the same perceptions; the connection between observations and the theory is getting more indirect and more dependent on maths"

I post today to complete some thoughts from yesterday and to go back to see why my intuitions at a younger age were justified- but it does take a more intensively progressive mathematics which looks at the foundations of foundations. The wild card idea says further that: "f:R3→{0,1}
In other words, at each point of the world, there either "is" something, or there is nothing." This does not include the idea of wild card in the general quasic expanded and reduced matrices now described which while they cannot be simplified to a nothingness necessarily they are nevertheless real in the background and should not be ignored as if metaphysical.

But as the Hung and Ha, the FU guardians of the gates I hold the conceptual and theoretical problem, especially in things like chiral distinctions or some such distinctions needed for a dynamic particle physics world (each dog-lion holds a sphere in his right and left hand) so I give the two views of space- a natural one of matrices and the quasic one of logical arrangement (determinants? freeze patterns?) as if a background view for general mathematics which for those without such a view when seeing it works imagines the author of such views to have the magical or secret methods or reasoning of the likes of say Ramanujan so to define the wild-card of the near known or felt as "genius".

* * *

I posted this just now on Pitkanen's discussion on superluminal neutrinos and the so called (would you believe in such mathematical wisdom some such mistakes are possible? That says a lot for how we ultimately simplify the world to math and to the quality of our conceptual and symbol systems developed so far:

Matti and all,

You may have noticed that in this discussion of superluminal neutrinos I used the special word teleomnic or tachyonic-like to describe such apparent phenomena.

The general theories, the supersymmetry of myself and Kea still stands, and always did.

The PeSla

* * *

Hammed there in a comment has some near quasic like and group like insights to share on this topic. But I post this as an example of work such as Kea's as intensive progress in its methods of research and theory. One might note she focused on the 24 units as a core of some configuration and that we can also focus on what is left outside such a core in a field as if the idea of a gauge or so on... we all gravitate toward this same general theory.

She further points out tachyons were part of the early string theory but abandoned.

And no Matti, I do not think you make clear the casual idea that if the tachyonic neutrinos were found that we could detect "gravity waves." As an extensive progression show us the brute force it so derived?

* * * * *

A stray thought number calculation that just crossed my mind from looking at the graph a couple of posts back and checking it out on the calculator.

10 x 10 contains 24 color quasic permutation color matrix for 76 gray wild-cards left.

76 is 4 x 19...
(256 x 19)- 4096 = 2 x 384

* * *

* * * * *

How Far and High does the Falcon Fly

2012-01-05T08:32:00.008-06:00

How Far and High does the Falcon Fly L. Edgar Otto January 5, 2012

Horus, the god of writing, man walking upright,
counts with his raptor head
Of ropes & tally marks & cycled rods for wheels
chance golden measure built higher the pyramids
Picture words & numbers one at history's dawn

As in the gyres of Yeats, phases of the moon,the
shadow geese migrate at their nineteenth autumn
The prairie dogs warn each other, surface peek
between the holes & mounds, underground their tunnels
The pure colors of my fleshy soul calls out blind to
the trace of falcons

A part of our dreams, our sun & grain give back to the gods
They weave & knead again, rejoin shadows & dust to Olympus.

* * *

It is not clear at all in the absoluteness of p-adic or in the surreal (where say the square root of 2 can be treated as if rational) that e, which can be divided by any number (prime?) - so we have a general color or quality of "primacy"- that in these rarefied & distant trans-Euclidean dimensions there cannot be a final, large, prime number presumably in a sea of the further idea of composites.

So can we have a view of an ultimate Omega, the last infinity- or all counting complete in algebraic time? How far can we dream & reach with our words and numbers?

The idea of proof has its place & utility but we should realize its context, scope. Certainly we do not want to abandon (even if logic can prove inconsistencies) its spirit of reasoning. Even our fantasy's can be true in its poetic parallels to its inner laws. Common sense & practice as far as we can see in low numbers & complexity suggests for a two dimensional flat plane four colors suffice for distinguishing adjacent regions. So to distinguish say, states on maps. If Illinois is blue and Nebraska blue, well, that is still philosophy. Yet, should we develop higher & superimposed (where the point is the plane as higher spaces cycle and begin at four space) dimensions with time-like concepts an Euclidean plane needs five colors.

These can be squared to to equal 25, or rather 24 + 1 of permutations. How dimensions, groups, & symmetries not seen develop from here is much how we develop measure & counting; how more than that given finds unity again & the grounding operations at coordinate singularities that combines cardinality and the idea of ordinals. A three dimensional space as such requires seven colors.

What are we to make & how was it done, someone decided that four of the Einstein variety of dimension is equivalent to the ten dimensions of the Euclidean variety?
Surely the question from either view will be difficult for most people. Higher dimensional space & its directions, inverses (compliments) may only appear simpler in symmetry beyond the lower three, four or five dimensions. This is also a question of applying distinct operations like division across things like fields. So we consider again the integers & the idea of primacy, also the duality & six fold congruences over models (a sort of primitive gender of perfect number idea in these unique numbers whose sum is 8 and not necessarily the view to put all things into six space.)

In particular, sets of sub- or super- color may move together or be exchanged resulting in 4D symmetry or anti-color symmetry globally, the compliments of colors locally interchanged depending on our choices, of view, of permutations combined.

These concerns seem to me intimately connected to close packing of spheres in all the dimensions (for now still in a numerology of intuitions). 64 + 16 = 70 the Catalan number here concerning points of 5 hypercubes. 24 x 4 by 4 is 384 the number of rotations and inversions of a hypercube. 40 (the number of 5D close packing) + 24 (the number of 4D close packing of spheres) is 4^3...by this I imagine 40 colors so composed as higher analogs of the triality of 8x3 hypercube faces and 8x2 further sets hidden for the total of 5! permuted cubes over time-like motion. Clearly what is unity and what are thirds derive integrally from such numbers. 240/40 = 6.

At some place we can imagine a mixing or something between how we divide alternate and simplex factorial even and odd permutation groups. The concrete description of color, moreover, as scales over unity is transitive over our defined dimensions (perhaps in a fractal like non-degenerate analog hierarchical manner).

A hypercube of 24 faces, moving and surfaces contiguous, can be considered as two cycles of ten objects so to get things like the Icosahedral groups of inversions and rigid rotations (which is a four way deal or actually 2^n super- or sub-duality analogs.

Recall that it is said that analogy is only true to the extent it reflects the underlying geometry of things- even if proofs of theorems is an art form, let us recall also that questions of minimum entropy, distance, action & so forth are also questions of art as related to statements of minimum lines and then the enhancement of color space as comprehensive style and imagination. We can be expert tracers keep in the main to some degree of error between the lines, or we can with some variation as to what we see in our own perceptions or those shared of color paint by the numbers too.

Triality of 5 such objects are deficient by one for the 4 by 4 matrix. Assembling 3 pentacubes x 2 in a 3 by 3 by 3 matrix gives partial sets of many such collections.

Each dimension, uniquely, has three or four abstract associahedra by such 2^n analogs. So too the 6 = 3+3 color cubes surround one of 15 tri-axial labels & the orientations or twists. Yet in a sense these structures may together be prime and unique in a given quasic state space. We only see 12 of the sets of 30 cubes.

Now, we know something happens at 9 dimensions- that is at 8 the volume of the square boundary analog space equals the volume of the sphere in the same dimension. I imagine also (as there are many ways to branch off from these informal intuitions so there is work that can be done) that in the deficit of the good old e to the i-pi equals one for the division of say a disk into so many parts where a curve meets some line at infinity so to speak, (I mean does the center of a spinning wheel move abstractly- or more to the point the poles of the earth to which the fixed star of their days the Aegyptian thought the direction and goal to some heaven- but holy Loxidromes and God said let there be Riemann! And God saw it was good and made him at a distance so to speak- said it was Gauss.) That at the zeros and the powers of two where this deficit occurs, say 256 (257 surreal nimber game like) that at the tenth such number, at 256 the values are equal again... I wonder if this continues for higher powers of two?

Continuous space and counting numbers may meet again where it is not clear that anything can ultimately cycle or be repeated when it comes to reduction to some zero singularity. I would caution also, despite the brilliant concept of the difference of cubes, 19 in particular- or even that coincidence of Euler to use the pentagonal numbers for some proofs of series- that in these matters of 2^R as Mersenne or Fermat numbers the addition or subtraction of ones and the divisions by 2 or 1/2 may have to be adjusted for more general number property values, perhaps for any such use of number to define better particle mass in the still hidden shadows of the beginning of symmetry in our new particle zoo.

Such a Higgs-like entity has at once a continuous body and a shadow for what is hidden beneath the discontinuous for its conception of a god with a falcon's head that can swoop down perhaps or be forever out of sight & only its wake seem faster than time- meanwhile, we watch the shadows & the direction of flight of the silhouettes that can be the goose or the hawk, take cover in our familiar planes and give warnings, dig and connect the tunnels of our languages and lifetimes.

* * * * *

Turtles again (note also Orwin they have 5 receptors, 4 for birds, three for us for the primary colors.) newscientist

Is this a matter of evolution or a fixed concept to take advantage of somewhat beyond our primitive ideas of a magnetic field- perhaps the turtles see in this five colors primaries so deeper into the surface of the Atlantic gyre...

* * *

I begin to get a glimpse of the complexity and various issues of groups and strings and symmetry in the usual manner- especially the work of Conway and related authors of some theories including those not yet settled. Terminology also: the "kissing number". Interestingly, I followed a slightly different path- even today I just typed how important the kissing numbers were for close packing- we all have the same dream we get a hint of I guess...

for reference I list this (but I would like to recall the recursive formula again:

196,560

Riemann surface resulting from taking the quotient of the hyperbolic plane by Γ0(p)+ has genus zero if and only if p is 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 41, 47, 59 or 71.

Dimension Lower
bound Upper
bound
1 2
2 6
3 12
4 24[3]
5 40 44
6 72 78
7 126 134
8 240
9 306 364
10 500 554
11 582 870
12 840 1,357
13 1,154[9] 2,069
14 1,606[9] 3,183
15 2,564 4,866
16 4,320 7,355
17 5,346 11,072
18 7,398 16,572
19 10,688 24,812
20 17,400 36,764
21 27,720 54,584
22 49,896 82,340
23 93,150 124,416
24 196,560

196882 or 196,884

*******

Quasic Permutation Space

2012-01-04T11:45:00.009-06:00

Here I post a clearer graph- but it does not show the rows as in four colors and he interchanges possible as in the sketch... and of course the Catalin number of things such as with the various reading of powers or of parenthesis and so on... on this depends some of our more abstract or recondite systems concepts such as only the inversion of half of a set of four color etc...

Quasic Permutation Space (4 & 5 Colour) L. Edgar Otto Jan. 3/4, 2012

First I will post some very relaxed notes with many errors and really just suggestive formula like symbols (due to low light and distractions and a need to rally effort after the holidays) but I know that in between the lines there are powerful ideas, so I post it.- I am not sure how original.

Dreams can be views from outside them or inside them. Like reading a CD or having to go through a tape, these aspects of the element and the filament, the rest and the motion in my primitive terminology. In candle making my pouring machines for many coloured layers could happen all at once or the usual assembly line. But by avoiding the assembly line idea when production was behind the assembly line dimension only made things much faster of the space saving all at once quasar like focus then put into a filament of time.

So I give you the quasic space permutations as a generalization of the quasics. I note Lubos discusses this way to see permutations in reference to Bose, his post of yesterday, and I note in a comment on Kea's last post how she considers something like sub-permutations. I note also that I use four colours and the permutations of that is of course 4! So, in the subspace 5! requires 5 colors, a sort of sub-sub-set of permutations or a wider scope of any such supersymmetric like fields. To do this although it is not necessary, we can extend the elemental quasic plane(brane) in a filamental direction, but this does not really seem a time dimension although the foundations of many theories utilize this process- as well the extension of four colours by the duplication of things as in the complex plane (of this there are core ideas beyond that of duplication and viriality with qualitative analogs.) Note I use the octonion like 8 colours in the compliments when we have abstract duplications.

I assume the four colors can fit into the 24 permutations in 12 sets of the quasic crosses which in groups of four looks like Eddington's descriptions of vector types in his general quantum relativity theory of 1929, the Uranoid. In this sense and as a totality I give you the Hyperuranoid.

By the issues of viriality we begin to see why in large aggregates of entities we find directionality- and this time asymmetry begins with at least 4 (or 5n) space. As such we should not think of Galois as a limitation but the beginning of new generalization of algebra and space (this is what happens also when we reach the 9th dimension to the nature of higher dimensional spaces that we can go on to more abstract ideas on which to seek out physical evidence such as particles.

Let us also consider Bessel numbers for dealing with the algebra (of which I only caught a glimpse of over the holidays and need to explore it more. Certainly we have here examples of surreal like reaching zero values or in matters of evenness and oddness a result of 1 or -1 for such useful coefficients) In general the "faithfulness" of a Galois general group is not just to be limited, by permutations, linearity, or matrix theory to some finite slice of things necessarily. This area should be explored in such matters as morphism of representations. This applies too to the universe in general within our observation radii at least.

Of course there are a lot of parallel ideas in different views of a general theory for example, delta-n, the infinite honeycombs (flat polytopes) of Coxeter represent a cycle of five flat spaces that projectively cycle into the five states. I am not sure how this may relate to this more general quasic permutation space but it does also involve the powers and concerns of Galois and how to solve roots of equations by such algebra. I do not mean this as we have higher mirrors than say applying the virial Dihedral groups (there are 2^n such virialities to establish any creative space, qualitatively as active analogs). In particular we can map the 120 elements on the quasic plane (brane) as a sort of superposition with rules for the further elements of crosses for the quasic state- and thus in the sub-sub-symmetries we can again relate and map the coordinates for things like the electron configuration of atoms for the 120 elements- or the 240 in natural 8 space halved. Now perhaps we can go deeper than this abstraction still to describe nuclear configurations and so on depending on the factorials involved that do not cancel out as physical properties. In the idea of colouring the boundaries that are distinct in the natural or Euclidean plane the four colour concept is a useful one to the the extent that it applies (and to any surface or genus or its analogs) for its exceptions too in the application of what is intuited or proved by these concepts.

* * * * *

I wish to correct a previous post- it is the veins and arteries that Pearson (around 1980) said was as if a cable system to which I said the general field (RF) that can grow all tissue over time replaces the nerves... Sorry for all these errors posted especially the use of color in the illustrations- I may correct that graphically someday... also the listing of the permutations of 4 very sloppy and not done with a formal method- then again we need to relate the 24 squares less ambigously to the 24 faces of the hypercube- I suspect a lot more is going on here than our very advanced ideas of Leech lattices, btw. Even if that is the most general description there would be analogs of this, at least conceptually.

* * * * *

I thought also My Virtual Room recreations would be of entertainment interest for what was on my mind from time to time.

Abstract Inertial Frames

2012-01-02T14:47:00.009-06:00

Abstract (Quasized) Inertial Frames L. Edgar Otto January 1st & 2nd, 2012

This post also inspired by the Judaeo-Christian dynamic when we interpret and sting together words and numbers into a story or model of existence as our core ideas reinforce each other or clash.

The Creation : As the spoken word rhea in Genesis and word in Hebrews as the Logos

Genesis 1

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

Hebrews 11

1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

2 For by it the elders obtained a good report.

3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

* * * *

The spirt of Gell-Mann on the quarks in this CERN talk on Lubos page could have made a lot deeper distinction based on that sort of quark grounding theory, that the underlying family of phenemes and phonomes has this three fold grounding- not just the spaces of depth and span. For three sub things describe the overt unity of change shifts in language as if to decide if there are fractional charges- we also should mention Lubos in his next post as to the so called mistakes of Bose etc...
We have to see some unities also that occurs among diverse languages in the same regions such as pronunciations along Western Europe.

* * *

I see that Kea is still deep into the theory and doing quite well- I thought to ask myself if there is but one associahedron per dimension what would this abstract inertia idea posted today mean for it- but we certainly should investigate approaches and restrictions to theories. We begin the new year synchronously on the same concerns of codes and such and it seems to me to be a very good direction for progress in unifying the concepts of physics. In a sense philosophy and science in the view of new results seems to have changed places a bit- perhaps because when the reality gets confusing (as from our experimental evidence, the reality) humans wax metaphysical.

* * *

My last post (disregarding the idea that general space on one level may be more relaxed and connected over various groups and dimensions of space and ambiguous directions of time) suggests to me that Leo Vuyk has a good approach to abstract knots in such abstract spaces. Of course once we ground his vision more concretely upon some background of reality.

* * *

This morning Pitkanen TGD is considering possible objections and perhaps connections within his own theory. I will not look deeply into this today other than noting that my post today could be of some help- perhaps the idea of a hierarchy of Planck values, or see Lubos for that concept of something not to exceed the Planck energy level in his Bose post. Or in general the absurdity that may be the case if we try to force things down into a minimum theory of a dimensionless string. But it is hoped that one of us finds something startlingly and refreshingly original and new. We who seem to be close to the universe to be seen within us.

* * * * *

The New Years Question one reply on facebook:

Ld Kristoffer J Martin ‎23 and some odd minutes.
Friday at 11:22pm

Now where one day changes to another that is a moving meridian? I did keep watch across the world and on my cell phone world clock- but it remained confusing - and well, I could not reach for a globe. What, no one else dared an answer?

My message on facebook today:

L. Edgar Otto
Let us begin our greatest year in a long while. Let each of us have a say and place in the joint decisions to be made and not impose upon another an unreasonable view to decide for them. We enter a time of an age of individuals again but let us not in the boom have a narrow view of our manufacturing nor think that the technology of our time if superior will remain so for long. Good Innovation and Good Society to you all... And try to build new truth so forget old lies...

*
****
01-03-12

I thought about a lighter project- My Virtual Room of which there would of course be a library... I note on this blog today a resource: Here

Dirac Reads more Clearly Now in Retrospect

2011-12-31T11:30:00.010-06:00

Dirac Reads more Clearly Now (to Me) in Retrospect L. Edgar Otto 31 December, 2011

Well, I got up at 5am and wrote these posts. At that time Samoa began to welcome in the New Year. (Damn, I thought I had it worked out in my head on the way here to the coffee shop, but now not so sure again... anyway for awhile I thought it 36 hrs again, but perhaps because of surreal multiplication normal numbers can have the value of one and a half again may have influenced my reasoning.) Anyway I also heard on the BBC on the radio a reminder in detail that light is given off by the separation of two surfaces such as sticky tape pulled apart but if there is a fourth post it is not written down on paper but I do so now. The main thing (that is the problems of what happens and why things are charged if in a sense we take them out of superposition, the separation of branes or equivalent spheres as charged entities and the nature of charge itself- addressed by Dirac early on- there does not seem to be an explanation, not a quantum one.

* * *

This sort of thing already set to ink in the before I heard the show. I posted this comment to Pitkanen this morning in trying to translate what his vision is from a my wider understanding of analysis and numbers:

Matti,
that is a very wise point. But in practice there are some things that appear to exist that are not understood even in terms of the quantum formulas.

How is it we can separate to sticky tapes and it gives off light and x-rays? Or why when we separate surfaces do the planes exchange charge one all positive and one all negative?

Part of it is the effect of this Van der Waals very week force which we know can be put into different models such as the point models- as you say with magnetism (I think is a metaphor for your deeper vision) and Maxwell's formulas- these forces can be thought of as points or Casmir forces or other such things- so what is your explanation of the idea of monopoles?

But I have no doubt all of this applies very closely to organic processes to the beauty and extent I read between the lines of your vision. I have not made the leap into some sort of disembodied field (magnetic body) mathematically indescribable, but I have not tried to reduce things to materialism or its slippery slope. I do not dismiss the possible connection.

I have had a few things to say lately in comparing our visions which I may post today or at the beginning of the new year- if you are interested. I think your question of how things on the level between the "wormholes" become somehow finite has a reasonable answer in my posts.

the Pe Sla

* * *
Unexplained Light

I feel my quasic view as described in the illustrations today go far to explain the light effects- as well some other theories of planes, such as the complex which the researchers of these weak Van der Waal's forces for St. Elmo's fire, and lightning, and breaking certain candies in the dark (wintergreen?) and the opening of envelops between the sticky flaps... and more to the point, the menicus of mercury in a tube shaken against the sealed glass filled with some neon, the very same gas by the discoverer of the Nobel elements- gives light orange and green- a separation of charge that remarkably occurs in pico seconds.

Can there be such effects that in space emit gamma bursts? In any case the background of the physics seems to relate on the micro and macro scale of the Dark Energy and the cosmic constant expansion. (I relate this also thru Peter Rowlands treatment of such quantum spaces and the explanation of Casmir like forces to TGD and philosophic issues of free will- as in the next authoress on the radio, the People's pharmacy, discussed a new book on how to deal with stress and new years resolutions by reducing the variability of our expectations of our future selves- it is clear that our behavior is influenced by a society that promotes stress and cycles of indulgence - witness the near riots in the large discount stores over the commercial holidays). I do not include ball lightning in this analysis so far as it is a pure quasic and creative phenomenon for frequencies and such. But how is it that infinitesimal complex light up from a modulus of density fits all scales that intelligibly corresponds to cosmic expansion so as to add to the evolving values and changes of a more general Omnium of spaces. Certainly, the brane idea has better grounding should we apply the concept to any more general space or to a foam of partially filled levels of space in the mix of chiral and neutrino time effects.

This phenomenon, without explanation of its light, I regard as evidence for the validity of the quasic theory and many near similar theories we all work toward.

* * *

FOOTNOTE: The illustration has significance as I look back at some of those from over last year... It mainly refers to commentary on Kea's insights and intuitions on algebraic structures. It seems strange to me that some views and problems have occupied many mathematicians for so long. I liked her recent comment on the nature of experiment and positivism also here. Original and Fundamental ideas, as with Dirac and Others depends a lot on that level with considerations of philosophy. Did not Einstein and Popper disagree over this issue in private letters to some degree? I imagine there will be a boom of economy and technology in the next few years... Optimistic yet I am grounded in the reduction of variations for a deep grasp of a steady state against too stressful variations such that we get an honest sense of those people, and those breakthroughs in science we imagine we become. But the interaction with this new dialog even at a distance does not cease to surprise me that I have something to say when I come to a brick wall or make some mistakes (the posted zeros of the surreal numbers due to sloppily drawing under the dim light of the television left out two of the ones in the count- but the spirit of it is there and with those a much more coherent theory)- that said, and not always aware of my exhaustion in the moment- I have no idea what topic I may take up for the start of the new year- things always seem to be a finishing as much as the calm eye of a hurricane before some new beginning. I feel more confident that I have begun to understand a lot of the formulas too in books such as Diracs classical one- but I also see him and others as just normal people writing for which the rest of us inherit as etched in stone what to him was a creative idea- half the battle in cognition if we have a worthy theory as an opponent- is the growing perception of these very creative first ideas which pass us in our thoughts as stray ideas if we can hold them and weigh the inputs that creative people take time to labor over and write down catching a moving target on the wing, sometimes. If I had the way I would bring us all together with our pens and boards and all- then again in a sense, I mean would we really move so far away from home when it is hard to go back and forth between isolation in the country to the cities in an economy where when a great state falls apart and no longer can defend itself against criminal elements it becomes a mafia state and return to false impulses and wants, especially after the loss of battle. Those in power fight very hard to keep it. We are in a contact of sorts at a distance each some part or potential of scalar beyond meaningful measure.

* * * * * * *

I saw on the news a lady has a book out describing Nixon as gay, alcoholic, prone to rash calls like nuke this or that country or the capitol, sham marriage with wife beaten up once into the hospital and seen a half hour a day and his lifelong friend seen holding hands with him, Beebee Rebozo had a bedroom in the white house and no role in the government spending more time with Nixon than his wife. So who runs the government or ran it? I recall Nixon was raised as a Quaker... makes sense that between him and Hoover don't ask and don't tell is a matter of silence until the spirit moves you. Now sometime last year Carter said it was time we had a gay president- well, If our first gay one is history I can imagine my more liberal friends asking why did it have to be Richard Nixon.

* * * *

Well, as pretty much a long practiced poet at least I know I did a good job of applying it to science- look at this interesting new scientist link, here.

How Many Hours is New Years Day on the Earth

2011-12-30T22:08:00.004-06:00

How Many Hours is New Years Day on the Earth L. Edgar Otto 12-30-2011

Lewis Carroll once asked "When does the day begin?" and the result of this was the International Date Line as a division of twenty-four time zones along the equator of the Earth. It was set in the Pacific where the jump between a given local hour across the line was a whole day so that it affected only sparsely populated regions. Let us recall that New Zealand is center of sea mass and England the center of land mass.

Recently, Soma changed its time zone to match that of its commercial partners to be three hours ahead instead of twenty one hours behind. Thus Friday, December 30th vanished from their calendar. I do not know what this means for birthdays, but I know the courts ruled workers are to be paid for that work day.

I have asked various well educated people in real life and over the internet this question and passionately received a few diverse answers in disagreements and even observed some to change their mind switching sides.

I regard it as a simple problem if I ever got around to work it out, or maybe chat with people over the world while the holiday is passing. But considering the models of mathematics involving projections and time from Riemann's analysis of manifolds to Dirac's observation on what styles of waves occur in nature, that and clock time difficult respecting longitude in navigation (the chronometer helped in its time), I am not so sure it is a simple problem. So, I will now address it creatively and informally welcoming any input or comments that may enlighten me, especially how it applies to our new particle zoo which seems to me still much in the state of theory Dirac called of that level of things, Pre-Bohr.

Consider a train of a unit, or interval length that goes through a tunnel of the same length. It achieves its length entering then leaving the tunnel. If we imagine this twenty-four hours a train then the usual answer is forty-eight hours to complete the full cycle around the equator for the holiday.

Of course the world spins in one direction, some say this changes things half again for the answer of thirty-six hours. If we imagine the tunnel in motion toward the train in motion some argue it to be precisely twenty-four hours. Others adjust the figures with better approximations that involve fractions added to parts of hours- not the consideration of say local sun time at any given location.

We also know from the voyage of Magellan taking a year and with kept daily logs to navigate the earth and from further voyages, depending on going West or East, the dates match or lose a calendar day coming back to the starting point.

This evokes in me foundational questions like what if in the center of a tunnel two half trains left each other at the speed of light. In a simple sense their relative velocity as if two photons is the velocity invariant of light. The twin paradox time differences, ground casuality, depends on which twin is undergoing acceleration. or for Dirac this sort of asymmetry is in the consideration of but one photon formalism.

Now, many have challenged my casual use of terms like an infinite velocity or problems like time travel, but such conceptions have begun to be discussed in the depths of physics again. These being questions of contiguity and congruences, isolated systems or open ones, in general singularities and certainly issues of conservation of energy.

We can map projections into projections, a sphere into a disc or expand lunes to so map and recursively map successive copies of the world again into the partially seen hyperbolic space representation of the interior of a circle. Or we can show the amount of daylight over the hemispheres, a Mercator projection as a moving double belt in the Geoclock (TM), the whole earth and in a sense its shadow.

If I were in Somoa today how many hours would December 30th be somewhere on the Earth?

* * * * *

Supercomputers & Surreal Chess Game Programming

2011-12-30T12:21:00.013-06:00

Supercomputers & Surreal Chess Game Programming L. Edgar Otto December 30, 2011

It seems possible now to me to treat a chess game in any dimensions between two players by the rules of surreal operations and quasic tables in binary. This raises a lot of philosophic questions especially when it comes to foundations of physics or the nature of what we imagine as consciousness.

We lose a game, as if we traveled briefly to another universe where we are not a chess master but a chess amateur- this is not to prove we do this in our minds or in some real place- the point is we make blunders or do not pay attention to some move of decision. Nor does it seem in the multiplicity of things we apply many of our moods or personalities to one game. It is natural to make human blunders as we are at least a supercomputer of computation which is to say our number space of a more finite operational variety has all the ambiguity of powers of the ordinal nimber space variety. Or we can think in vague concepts as we concentrate upon the powers as concrete finite values making the clear and intelligible logical algebraic steps to find what we have designed what we were looking for. Chess defined then (at least for now where one can at least keep the game going by choosing the structural coordinate surreal zeros) as the winner is he who did not make the last blunder. Can I say then that a system, in this case a human mind, who imagines such ways to program or perceive a theoretical basis for the universe will as an analog digital surreal quantum quasic supercomputer at least find the answer in those terms just as would raw disembodied analog conscious or cold mechanical computation.

So I post mistakes in the matching of primes- I vaguely thought I should have checked the list but it was just the first few primes so I left out 43 thinking of yes, 51 is divisible by 3. But is was informal work anyway. Yet I decided this error was part of the human organization of mind- I mean at years end we see the old gods of our youth dying before us (and an exception to the rule someone like Steve Jobs ten years younger I bracket by my years.) But in what sense can we say that God as a mathematician is a Master chess player anyway, or as I wrote above can some level of the game play itself and can we prove it. So I worked out the pattern with the error and found two concepts, the half quasic mirror and the varying in more formal series choices of what a unified atom of a prime can be when there so chosen beyond ideas of some permutation in shifting sequence.

Imagine we are in a room and there is a little night light and you awaken a little confused as to what you are seeing having never seen the room (Plato's cave?) in the light of day before. The room is full of various hats, baseball hats of many colors in particular. At first we are frightened because we think these are alive and not necessarily friendly surrounding us. These are in fact the "Cheshire grins" of evidence of a ghost world. But after awhile you realize that even if the ghosts where there they cannot hurt you and that all you see is the colorful and artful collection of the hats. We need a more full picture of real and dream spaces.

For example, Lubos tries again to defend the quantum theory against the mere "pilot waves":

"People, those bigots who are still denying that the insights of quantum mechanics inevitably force one to be careful about the positivist, instrumentalist principles and that forces us to understand science as a gadget to organize our observations rather than to promote the idea about an "independent real world": give up, apologize, shut up, and calculate!" But I would think it a lot deeper question to comment on than the issues, instructive ones, of the early part of the last century. What does this surreal view say for the idea of pure string theory or what is or not some ghostly field or particle or something left out of the concepts that we can move on in an imperfect model that clarifies eventually some better one or method as our goal? Again we find the acid test of philosophy the issues of free will and determinism- freedom of degrees as in the vaguely sensed and outlined matrix method done by the Japanese in the news in terms of course of modeling the results with a supercomputer simulation. At least we know now in some proofs and cases and implications to any higher end where an error can be known before hand to show up that we can rely on such simulations after all. But applying this to particle physics, the purpose of our national security development, was to simulate nuclear explosions and understand particle physics. Yet we must know how such physics works to program the computers in the first place.

The idea of a time independent self evolving chip, a little redundant and with isolated transistors of which if we remove one the circuit fails, at least can be explained by the surreal zeros in the design as filled or not, uniquely or not. But as to playing the game in the actuality of the existential moment of this universe even if something like total randomness is the foundation just this side of nothingness- what is the point of a chess master with the help of a supercomputer playing a supercomputer with the help of several chess masters?

* * * * *

Matti,

No problem, If I had a lot of hair I am sure when I touched the coils with such high voltage theories it would make it stand on end, Einstein like.

Your deeper ideas are hard to get a clear picture of in new terms- but I do see the classical level as a sort of prime or given- but consciousness as such is not any more mysterious and miraculous as the fact of matter as given, to me anyway. If we cannot (philosophically) show God exists or not, how can we say consciousness itself is beyond any mathematical formula? Not to say there may not be some such unique reality to be so described. But I did offer lately other or alternative consciousness definitions in terms of the empty distances between generalizations like p-adic (adele) and quasic and Conway's surreal space- I mean I read your concepts on a much higher level than say the quantum terminology- for is quantum mechanics not the heart of chemistry anyway and we cannot reduce neuroscience to that?

The PeSla (but I am not coiled even to Lubos, see my post today abusing your name perhaps- the Pikanadic Continuum or the Pikanomnium.)

* * * * *

Surreal Number Tables over Quasic Space

2011-12-29T17:32:00.004-06:00

Surreal Number Tables over Quasic Space L. Edgar Otto December 29, 2011

I thought I would do the obvious and convert Conway' "nimber" tables of addition and multiplication and powers into the quasic grid ordering.

I wonder what it means for someone to hold that if we find a hypothesis true like Riemann's then "a large part of number theory must be redone" those that begin with something like "assuming the Riemann Hypothesis is true, then the following theorem...". Is it not the same for Turing who believed this hypothesis not true? Is it the same for Conway who feels the continuum hypothesis is false?

This is a logic problem I imagine and we do achieve things along the way- if a student of the abstract can master them or if someone is in touch with such concepts in some form intuitively, or that they have a sense of intelligibility of letters and numbers- for example an idea of base called lexicographic wherein each digit is treated as if part of a general base number. The problem is where these ideas meet in our heads and the structures of our heads as analog and computational devices over some form of physicality, physics. Thus those looped in a theory may or may not be justified in the exclusion of a different or equivalent view if that is the ultimate case or not. Or we have not reached a new intellectual cognitive level and sufficient to the day of problems thereof all research is glorious and all errors in the innocent spirit of things can be forgiven in the eyes of history.

I would ask myself after doing what seems so trivial yet suggestive in this illustrated chart (forgive all the dots of prime coordinates for now as I had to recycle my qs graph paper.) If in a generalization beyond the quasic and surreal can I imagine an empty distance as an analog to those lesser geometries or in some sense like some feel the string formalism achieves a totality of exclusion within the bounds of physical reality this is the case decidability. That we cannot prove God exists or not by some method or level is a matter of (well accepting all experienced inputs) a matter of philosophy but it may be a matter of science as well. We could hardly reason without some such intelligible, even common sense ground of these abstractions in some form on some level we can get our head around, but in doing so we should not assume we have then mastered the infinite that once so challenged us.

So much of patterns can suggest if not tell us something. I see in one of the three tables above that the quasic regions, 3 x 3 or 2 x 2 come together to arrange the zeros in the first 4 x 4 quadrant region. There are seven here (presumably the two sets of 4 which I regard as quasic generations merge at the zero or unity position. So this seems the Fano plane number or the similar idea of octonions and so on in that we may go a little further to generalize our ideas of the projective plane. Of course it is instructive to read the diagonals and rows and columns as if a matrix.

In the numerology beyond these 7 into three space of 2^8 do we not just barely get into the endless patterns to say in a coordinate we can imagine 11 dimensions? Just a suggested idea- much as the idea that there is a dynamics of multiplication between the generations one down on the same level of abstraction as per Riemann's insight on space dimensions, (is there a nimber to the nimber power chart- if not why? Is there something perhaps I am missing again that does not make the abstraction clearer to me? If missing then why can our theoreticians come so close and be so intricate and miss it?

Whatever else I can say about this quasic idea it inspires a lot of abstract thoughts, and evidently a hell of a lot of trying to express things in words- so it gives as much or more than it saves us in visualization. Something in us also wants a solid grounding and maybe the certainty of a totality, not just the quicksand of change in descent endless into the surreal infinitesimal.

But I wanted to illustrate with a picture of the quasic chess game with the ordinals and cardinals and surreal levels and physical dynamics focused and implied in such a complex (here four space compressed into three)... But I am sure you get the picture.

Oh well, I made a simplified cover illustration...
* * * * *

Surreal Continua & God Made the Primes...

2011-12-29T12:19:00.007-06:00

Surreal Continua & God Made the Primes... L. Edgar Otto December 29, 2011

I might add that the usual notation as far as powers of powers is intrinsically ambiguous when it comes to these distinctions of the natural or usual numbers and those on different power levels of surreal calculus so other than a rule that imposes some ordering (as the operational order of parentheses- thus in the string like space we do find the Catalan numbers relevant) as natural counting even over some infinite continuum. The same goes for other functions and zero, infinite or special unity division. This quasic generalization also reflects our ambiguity of what we can see with those core reality omnic values zero x infinity = unity when all other theories save some ultimate source or origin against a background of absolute non-existence as a sea of discontinua- this is the foundations of the foundations- and of course in that these are quasiclly ordered in a plane of syllogism that part of logic applies with general consistency and certainty- but we could of course expand such tables of validity to triality and perhaps beyond as a matrix. The universe is most certainly and unquestionably multidimensional and these do have ultimate pictorial representations. Quasics covers the surreal, Fermat's considerations, reciprocity, base issues and binary power distinctions, p-adic and higher number systems, the discriminants and matrices, brane theory. I find it interesting that a rather trivial result to me, as a focus of the algebra, that the Heegner numbers move qualitatively to the a and b quasic axes or that the Fermat primes the a axis and the main diagonal one of great and hidden significance. I know that Kea was keen on these numbers but I did not look into her links nor think about them at the time of her update (I should go back and look, I suppose theorems with confusing names of people put me off a little). For her last post I find it interesting that she has different signs in the imaginary part of her matrix.
But such problems of the orientation of say triality squared or cubed (implied) color cube axial orientation was after all the wider discovery and concern of my Triaconway space.

I see that Lubos today is beginning to see this deeper level of space insofar as the ordinal numbers are concerned... synchronously. We sense this greater unification of space- but other than some vague idea of time to explain it topquarkomnium needse a deeper reason for its exclusion from the game.

* * * * *

I posted this comment to Pikanen today:

Well, Matti,

With great visions (and sometimes lesser visions) one certainly gets the idea of a unification of things happening in the universe or brain. It is a powerful leap of our cognition.

Of course this seems to me beyond the leap to proof of such unity as existing. Yes, I have touched on this sort of philosophy lately with the idea that just perhaps there is some sort of physics involved- not sure Magnetism is the fundamental idea as we know it.

But it is on the way to understanding at least the mathematics that may be involved.

So the issue of what happens between classical and the other representations in relation to this sense of uniqueness and unity we call consciousness is still an open question- you should submit this sort of thing to the link I supplied in the call for papers a few of my posts back.

The PeSla

* * *

I find it interesting that Hawkings is asking for help to improve his ability to technically communicate. In a sense this asks the reverse question of how we interact physically with whatever theoretical visions we find by hard work or epiphany.

In a more general space, well, like dream space, we face the model or code of the universe. These issues of theology and neurology can be seen as an aid to the search for the unity in phyiscs, but only we dare to look outside our own visions and trudge on despite the defending of powers entrenched in history and the world.

* * *

Happy New Year and New Physics

2011-12-28T13:33:00.028-06:00

Happy New Year and New Physics, post to appear here next time perhaps. Happy 2012.

Leonard Edgar Otto

I noticed on the news this morning that today is a new tradition where a lot of things are thrown away from the past year for a new start- I wonder then if this sense of needing a new start and the shredding of our former incarnations of belief and learning, of loves and holiday ups and downs of joys and sorrows and abandonment to foolish behaviors and resolutions... is not a natural part of the cycle of things and the bigger picture.

Lubos has this interesting view on the matter. It is all so elemental. Anyway, having missed the photo of the sun in reflection for the poem I included a couple of post back I place it here but more to the afternoon. Poem (Inside and Outside Our Myths and Taste of Caves 27 Dec. 2011) at bottom of the Dreamtime post.

OK all you synthetic and analytic, finite and continuous theorists- keep plugging onward. May we find better days to come whatever the source and promise of rainbows.

* * * * *

Uniqueness and the Congruence Problem

2011-12-28T12:55:00.007-06:00

Uniqueness and the Congruence Problem L. Edgar Otto Dec. 28, 2011

Drawing on the Cave Wall for the First Time Again

Consciousness is at least the connection between isolated and unique paths, beyond some boundaries, beyond the necessity or sufficiency of substance as a ground, across what seems hidden to the mathematics and structure of the highest concept of the whole.

It is a small step to imagine that the unity of the world, its vastly complex intelligent and intelligible design that from some Creative Source that any life or mind is far from such a God in the modulus of their unique existence.

Lesser visions, while grounded in any bounds, can only ambiguously claim absolute uniqueness as the theory of the whole. The world cannot be just the immortal heartbeats or the organic bag that would have stem cells self organize. Yet even in the petrie dish separate hearts synchronize their beat. A state, artificial or not where the bounds are that of wrought glass and controlled conditions, will aim for false mergers or totalities reasonable and intelligible at some time.

We cannot have a world where our touch of the source is unlimited to the design and ultimate bounds. No state that feeling the source desires to be Orthodox in its monothism and traditions of rules can endure. No state be it the fundamentalism of the Christian West or the Islamic Middle East can sustain hegemony over the egg case of philosophies of design and the shell of this earth. Nor can the denial of a Creator. Nor the acceptance of all inputs of enquiry as in the Eastern, yet still imperfect and debated philosophies.

It remains unclear to me if there is an ultimate hand intervening or guiding our destinies as a possibility of the problem of unique existing or direction to some vague purpose in the world. Yet we know that all can ponder the design and the source whatever their station of sentience and whatever their resources that connect to the material economics of their place and time - also the respect for other creatures that raises the idea or the sensing of the good idea of respect for life in general.

At the humbling state of my slumber and new awakening, and more modest understanding that begins to arise from my dreams again, I realize the solving of some of these theoretical problems of our time is the higher purpose of finding ourselves and the source and why of all things.

* * * *

Feeling a little more integrated in my cognition I quote from a link by Plato on this result commented on earlier by Pitkanen. It should be quite clear that while this is an interesting result in terms of the Triality (See Kea's research, Updates like 127 and in general) of the 9 of spatial dimensions and the source or origin that suggests a 3D expansion thus inflation models- this a link between super-string and supercomputers (that is hardly human elementary when humans obviously have intuited and imagined the patterns long ago).
That this is a small part of the theories I refer and write about from the existing mathematics, and then only if it acknowledges the quasic matrix idea- that btw exceeds the concerns of complex numbers of some teleology of the Omnium- so it is a great experiment but less than complete theory, GUT or UFT-wise. Then again, the issue here (short of an assertion that it is reasonable to assume a Creator with Intelligent Design in the hard sense as philosophy) is after all what it means ultimately to do theoretical physics...and how worthwhile it is to spend our lives and have so many work so long in the same issues once set into motion and usual orignating by some individual and imperfect mortal human. Perhaps it is obvious that three people who give their names to a theory develop one of nine dimensions.

"IKKT matrix model

A new formulation of superstring theory was proposed by Ishibashi, Kawai, Kitazawa and Tsuchiya in 1996. (IKKT represents the initials of the authors.) The conventional formulation of superstring theory is valid only when the interaction between strings is weak, so it is not suitable for application to real physical phenomena. The IKKT matrix model, which uses large matrices to represent the fundamental dynamical degrees of freedom, has been formulated in a way that is also valid when the interaction between strings is strong."

Earlier investigations were restricted to the analysis of the model that treats time as an imaginary variable for technical reasons, and the relationship to the real world was not clear from the results. In the present research, the technical difficulty of treating time as a real variable has been overcome, enabling for the first time the application of the model to cosmology by explicit calculations.

Are things set into motion along some path to save the Big Bang, Inflation, or the Minimal Superstring Theory? Or does the design and its complexity and path boundaries have the concepts fall into place that only imagine some sort of inverses or compliments as mirrors of which there is no reason to assume physical or rational connections?

* * * * *

I found Lubos post of yesterday quite humorous (good thing a consultant for a sit come, the Big Bang, as a comedy has a sense of humor) for taking the title seriously I immediately came to his same conclusions- the 247 reptiles smuggled in by a Czech national, corresponds numerologically to the Maximum 248 symmetries of the monster group. Lubos counts the smuggler... But I went on to ask about the animals that died (or were caught) in flight- somehow in an 8D representation the 4 time-like dimensions of the 240 spheres close packed around a center one. :-)

Adele Quantum Mechanics and Riemann Dynamics

2011-12-27T16:48:00.005-06:00

Adele Quantum Mechanics and Riemann Dynamics L. Edgar Otto 27 December 2011

Inspired by reading Prime Obsession this general subject HERE a recent paper involving those mentioned in Derbyshire's book.

This is a book that will survive as a great and informative read whatever idea we have of the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis. In it I find the beginning of a serious and formal mathematical and physical (interestingly the author says to Gauss and Riemann these were not yet thought of as separate divisions) as well as a work of foundational philosophy. It shows the how of a generalization of the idea of p-adic numbers.

Two related concepts in my estimation- that by Russel we could not find an adequate definition of a number (not even its class concept) and If Godel uses primes in his proof in light of at least the approach of Adele then clearly there is more to the problem than still meets our eye when we try to understand a deeper meaning of what primes are. As the author says some believe and some do not that this approach holds water as respected mathematicians so even p-adic theory as a position is already a matter of controversy as to the acceptance by the math and physics community.

I might add that in the bounds of horizontal flat lines and the Big O problem that if we also include Weiestrass for the ideas of the Plane then we could imagine a sort of mirror 1/Big O perhaps but as usual the notation is lacking. We also can imagine a mirror of the quasic plane in terms of complex numbers in bounds that resemble parabolas, and this perhaps involving the mirror hidden quasic diagonal that would balance the idea of a quantum dynamics as a unification of the Riemannian variety (again with this issues asking if a system is complete (even when consistent). There is very much more to be explored and even now what I have posted is most likely very much behind papers. I would not at this point assume that the hypothesis is either true or false, or is either but intermittently- for it is such concepts at issue here as a matter of intuitions without the mathematics or training that seem to make parallels in my isolated understanding (indeed, the hypothesis is intimate to these ideas but I doubt just in the description of how it related to particle shells as classical entities only for matters of probability- especially the idea that primes are maximally random in all conceptual universes.

I wonder, considering the efforts put into this problem if we might consider the hypothesis the very heart of unification's to come as so many go different ways in the pursuit of systems of physics- again something perhaps a little beyond its truth or falsehood as a reachable and practical proof. Certainly it involves any idea of condensates and more advanced thermodynamics.

* * *